Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I decided on confrontation - which I hate.  Omg the arrogance of the driver.  They refused to say who had given them the alleged permission to park on the private land - unless I proved ownership.  I couldn't believe they could be so objectionable.   They advised they couldn't take public transport to work as they lived too far away.  They couldn't rent a local garage as none were available. I simply said that's their issue not mine. It was infuriating that this person had such misplaced entitlement.  However I decided to humour them and show them the title deeds.   They couldn't respond.  Although at this point they alleged some guy in a city up north - whose name they couldn't remember - gave permission!!    They then asked if they could buy the garages and land!! Yet can't afford to park on a meter !! They seemed to back down and agree to now park elsewhere.  I hope so. 
    • I've worked out the contractor invoiced apx 250k - Without adding vat to the invoices.  So based on above he should have added vat to all invoices once he reached 85k?  Obviously he had to pay his labourers - would those payments get taken off what he received?  Or it doesn't matter cos he invoiced for the high sum?
    • Greetings, I'm writing to seek assistance with an ongoing issue I'm having with Manchester Council.  I parked my car in a residential area behind Wilmslow Road to go purchase some food, not realizing it was a no-parking zone. I later received a letter stating I had failed to make the required payment, and the penalty had increased. I appealed the fine, explaining that I had parked there but never received the original Penalty Charge Notice (PCN), so I was unaware of the need to pay. However, the council's reply did not address my initial concern. Is there anything I can do in this situation? I admit to parking there, and I was willing to pay the original fine, but I don't think it's fair for them to demand a doubled amount when they failed to send me the initial PCN.  Any advice or guidance you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance for your assistance.   MK Document.pdf
    • If you look at some of the other debt related threads will see that one of the first things which will be asked will be for you to list out your debts in a brief chronological order, including date of debt, amount, creditor, amount outstanding, defaulted – yes/no – date of default, date of last payment made, have you acknowledged the debt at all to the creditors. That lot at least. I expect that my colleague @dx100uk will be along but will meet to know at least that information
    • Hi, I have found this group very helpful hence I am here seeking help and advice.   I got myself into a situation where I have now more than £50k in unsecured debts (personal loans & credit cards) and things are now getting out of control as I am struggling to make payments. This is purely my own created situation and I am taking 100% responsibility for it. I am keen to get out of this situation as soon as possible hence I would appreciate any help and advice in this process. I am employed at the moment and don’t want to risk going into IVA or bankruptcy as this would risk losing my job. Being sole bread earner of my family, I cannot afford to lose my job. I have been trying to keep up with the payments so far and had few missed payments instances until 3/4 months ago but got caught up with missed payments somehow using my savings. All my debts are still with original lenders. However I know I am getting into same situation again shortly and won’t be able to get out of it again. I have started exploring Debt Management Plan (DMP) option through StepChange but haven’t submitted it yet. Based on budgeting, I have around £820 available to make payments to all lenders after taking care of all other essential expenses. This is definitely lot more affordable than what I am currently paying to different lenders. 1. Is DMP right option for me in current situation? 2. what are the negative consequences of availing DMP? 3. is there something else that I can do to get out of this situation? I’m determined to clear out all my debts but need bit of breathing space and time. Let me know please if you need any additional information. Thanks in advance for all your help and guidance. MM  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

URGENT Parking firm taking me to court and demanding my insurance docs? WHAT!?????


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5763 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yawn. Really, really boring now. Clearly an ongoing [problem]/attempt to deceive people into believing a set of troublesome consumer affairs sites is involved. The silence/ridiculous innuendo of the latest posting says it all.Regards being banned on pepipoo, the mod probably has a low boredom/bull****ter threshhold and more power to him. The only cowards on here are CPS trolls who lurk on this site (because they have nothing better to do) trying to deceive others into paying unenforcable invoices. Regards questioning people, this troll has not answered any of the questions that have been put to him. Fairly clear to me who should be ashamed but some people have no shame it seems.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 169
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest courtupdater
More Edit . Judgment (which will include reference to defence) can be posted at anytime appeal or not

 

A judgement would NOT reference a defence .. what are you going on about ??

 

The judgement will be 1 piece of paper which will state how muich has to be paid and when.

 

 

Anyway .. the reality is this ... When a poster comes on here who has received a ticket from a PPC the advice is always to never disclose anything in public as it could help the other side .. but keep people informed of the progress (and you all bahh like sheep when it goes your way).

 

So, Why would any PPC (or any company) give too much information ?? Does not make sense, in the same way as the "experts :rolleyes:" on here would not dream of posting the defence they have assisted someone with or their case details !!!!

 

The "experts :rolleyes:" on here and PePiPoo have assisted others and say 'a good defence will always win' .. but they have never posted it .. why do you think that is ??

 

Come on .. this is a game to which presently every case results in a win for the PPC (Excel parking put aside, but I asked the question earlier if anyone knows the FACTS of the case or only what they have read in the quality local paper .. oh and the daily mail ... and the silence answered my question)

Edited by saintly_1
removal of an already edited quote
Link to post
Share on other sites

Is a filed defence not a public document available to anyone who requests it at the court? Where is the prejudice? This is beginning to sound like "the dog ate my homework" territory (if I recall correctly the last CPS troll was unable to post the transcript of the case they lost in Olham due to some equally spurious reason). What I want to know is - if this is the level of their (lack of) legal expertise how did the defendant lose. Suggests he may not have turned up fore the hearing and CPS had a free run that even they could not lose (another question that has suspiciously not been answered).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest courtupdater
it would be very nice to see all the information posted... :-)

 

I can guarentee in the goodness of time all will be revealed, there are good reasons why they have not passed everything to be posted.

 

I would ask, and I hope the site admin team will support me on this ...

 

There is no need for insults against me or anyone else on this thread ... I know its a bitter pill for some hardened anti-PPC posters to accept when a case goes against them ... but its not personal, just business ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

The "experts :rolleyes:" on here and PePiPoo have assisted others and say 'a good defence will always win' .. but they have never posted it .. why do you think that is

 

This is getting really weird now. If these experts that you continually refer to have never posted the defence (100% contrary to what you said this morning), how do you know it is a "pepipoo/CAG defence"? Is it that "you just do"? These arguments have more holes than a sieve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest courtupdater
Is a filed defence not a public document available to anyone who requests it at the court? Where is the prejudice? This is beginning to sound like "the dog ate my homework" territory (if I recall correctly the last CPS troll was unable to post the transcript of the case they lost in Olham due to some equally spurious reason). What I want to know is - if this is the level of their (lack of) legal expertise how did the defendant lose. Suggests he may not have turned up fore the hearing and CPS had a free run that even they could not lose (another question that has suspiciously not been answered).

 

Because the case is ONGOING ..... no one lost anything - a new hearing has been set .. after that I am sure it will be posted on here.

 

No a filed defence is NOT a public document in a small claims hearing, where you get this from I do not know !!!

 

If a person, not party to the claim wishes to see the documentation they need to make an application (and pay the fee) to the court stating the reasons why and a judge will decide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Court [edit] is complaining about being insulted............. what a bleeding nerve.

 

also you don't want to be insulted either pee off or stop insulting our intelligence

Edited by GuidoT
Please do not use foul language
Link to post
Share on other sites

A judgement would NOT reference a defence .. what are you going on about ??

 

The judgement will be 1 piece of paper which will state how muich has to be paid and when.

 

 

Anyway .. the reality is this ... When a poster comes on here who has received a ticket from a PPC the advice is always to never disclose anything in public as it could help the other side .. but keep people informed of the progress (and you all bahh like sheep when it goes your way).

 

So, Why would any PPC (or any company) give too much information ?? Does not make sense, in the same way as the "experts :rolleyes:" on here would not dream of posting the defence they have assisted someone with or their case details !!!!

Because the entire point of your thread is that this case was lost due to the defendant allegedly following the advice of posters on this and other forums.

 

Your inability to substantiate your claim damages any credibility that you might have.

 

The "experts :rolleyes:" on here and PePiPoo have assisted others and say 'a good defence will always win' .. but they have never posted it .. why do you think that is ??

 

Come on .. this is a game to which presently every case results in a win for the PPC (Excel parking put aside, but I asked the question earlier if anyone knows the FACTS of the case or only what they have read in the quality local paper .. oh and the daily mail ... and the silence answered my question)

Could you not just take you own advice and apply to the court for a transcript of the Excel hearing?

 

Having read this, and other threads, it would seem to me that the claim being made by the "experts" (not that they profess to be - that appears to be your own particular straw man) is that no PPC has won in a properly defended case, and each time this claim has been made, it has been substantiated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest courtupdater
Yeah but we only mean the victims shouldn't always disclose their intentions not the perps. they can say claim & say what they like.:p

 

Of course a Judgment refers to the defence. Now either put up or shut up.

 

Eh !!! The judgement is a 1 page document ... I suggest you look at some judgements:

 

Here is a judgement: http://www.combinedparkingsolutions.com/downloads/morris.pdf

 

Do you mean a transcript of the hearing ... Judgement transcript ... I think you are getting confused :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest courtupdater
This is getting really weird now. If these experts that you continually refer to have never posted the defence (100% contrary to what you said this morning), how do you know it is a "pepipoo/CAG defence"? Is it that "you just do"? These arguments have more holes than a sieve.

 

The "experts :rolleyes:" assist persons/defendants in private and then they are sent ...

 

The "experts :rolleyes:" are currently assisting 2 other people (at least to my knowledge) with claims - if not then 2 posters who have came on sites for help, been advised to PM and then send in almost identical defences is uncanny !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest courtupdater
The case is ONGOING now that's news

 

I thought CCPS won. Why did I think that I wonder ...................Oh I know I was told by someone.........who was that do you think??????? must have been an eeejit

 

Youre getting confused again ... The OLDHAM case is still ongoing.

 

Yes some idiots said it was over and CPS lost as the result of a robust defence given by CAG/PePiPoo and everyone beleived them .... but alas, no its still an ongoing case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest courtupdater
Because the entire point of your thread is that this case was lost due to the defendant allegedly following the advice of posters on this and other forums.

 

Your inability to substantiate your claim damages any credibility that you might have.

 

Could you not just take you own advice and apply to the court for a transcript of the Excel hearing?

 

Having read this, and other threads, it would seem to me that the claim being made by the "experts" (not that they profess to be - that appears to be your own particular straw man) is that no PPC has won in a properly defended case, and each time this claim has been made, it has been substantiated.

 

I have a transcript of the HEARING and JUDGEMENT - So I know exactly why it failed.

 

Thats why I want to know if anyone else has any facts rather than the drivel in the local news & daily mail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...