Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Met are out of order in this new version of their PCN. They show your car arriving and leaving via the ANPR cameras. They then go on to describe this as the parking period knowing full well that since your car still has to drive to a parking space and later drive from the parking space to the exit. How this can be described as a parking period with so much driving involved is beyond me.    
    • I have a similar issue, I was caught shoplifting in M&S last fortnight (which I'm ashamed of) and I received a letter from DWF with the £125 fine and the price of the goods. I've paid the money. The police were not called, but a police letter was sent to a presumed suspect. Will this letter affect the options I choose when applying for a visa (I checked many posts and found no one who has received a similar letter). Is it all over after paying the money? I'm so anxious about it all!
    • I used to go to the Sainsbury's in the Cromwell Road London and my wife used to get PCNs there. I just spoke to a manage onsite and they were good enough to get them cancelled. If you take in the PCN , they photograph it and that is the end of it. Which is what should happen with major companies when their customers are ripped off by the rogues. Are you listening Mcdonalds and Starbucks?
    • I was caught shoplifting in M&S last fortnight (something I'm ashamed of) and I received a letter from DWF containing a fine of £125 and the price of the goods. I've paid the money. The police were not called, but a new police letter was received with a presumed suspect. Will this letter affect the options I choose when applying for a visa? Is it all over after paying the money? I'm so anxious about it all!
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PCN mare!!**WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5816 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Any statutory notice for an offence that took place after you sold the vehicle must be returned as required giving what details you can about the sale of the vehicle in order to change your liability. Only the issuing authority is in a postion to make a decision based on the evidence that you provide.

What they are saying here is that you need to respond to the PCNs/Notice to Owner issued by the local council. On the Notice to Owner there is a box which you can tick which says that the contravention did not occur because I was not the owner of the vehicle. The DVLA have no power to cancel PCNs only the issuing council can do that.

 

You may be able to acheive the following with just a letter to the council but this may be a better way of acheiving the cancellation. Unfortunately it means revealing your address.

 

 

  1. Obtain the background information on the PCNs in question (reference numbers etc)
  2. Fill out an Out of Time Statutory Declaration that you didn't receive the paperwork. (you can do this for free at your local court)
  3. Send the completed form to the TEC (Traffic Enforcement Centre)

    1. If the OOT is accepted then this will stop bailiff action and return the process to the NTO stage. You will need to advise the bailiff of this.
    2. [*]Ask for the NTO to be sent to your new address. (Advise the council)

      [*]Wait to receive the NTO.

      [*]At this point you can then put your case that you did not own the vehicle at the time of the contravention. You can include details of the sale and dates - including any evidence you have of when your paperwork was received by the DVLA. If you have bank statements showing a largish deposit around that time (i.e. proceeds from the sale) then that will further strengthen your case. You could also include witness statements and so on.

      Hopefully that should be enough to put an end to this the matter and get the council chasing the rightful owner (sounds like they'll need a brave man to go and clamp the car:D).

       

      In answer to one of your earlier questions PCNs are issued for authorities running De-criminalised Parking Enforcement. This power was made available to councils under the 1991 Road Traffic Act. What this means is that for parking infringements is now handled by a seperate, supposedly independent body, rather than the magistrates court. So you can't be arrested for non-payment or fined anything further.

       

      What is supposed to happens is that you get a chance to pay at a discount rate for two weeks at the full rate for a further two weeks. Once that time expires assuming you haven't made representations or appealed then they apply to the Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC) to get the "debt" enforced. This basically means that they get a warrant of execution and bailiffs come calling, adding their charges as they do.

Edited by pin1onu
  • Haha 1

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Thai 1 Council 0. :)

 

I won yay! Thanks for the help peeps. :D

 

Nice one.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...