***Warning*** Combined Parking Solutions/CPS Lurking ***Warning***

[pin1onu]

A number of the regular posters on this site have unearthed evidence that employees from Combined Parking Solutions aka CPS are lurking on the site. They read all postings and attempt to identify the driver from the information provided.

 

While this is not the end of the world, as they still have to produce evidence of their charges being valid and not penalty charges, and also that their alleged contracts do not breach the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts, it does mean the loss of your first line of defense.

 

In light of this if you have a "Parking Ticket"/Invoice from this firm then I suggest you do not use their name in any of your postings. If you do use the name in your postings then keep things in general terms.

 

It may pay you to use the name of another big firm such as Euro Car Park, NCP etc in your post as the advice will be the same but it will be impossible to link you with the details.

 

If you post any copies of invoices or letters that you receive then please make sure you blank out the following

 

1: Serial Number

2: Your Vehicle Registration Mark

3. Location

4. Date

5. Time

6. Letterhead

[pin1onu]

Is it just me that finds it more than a little distasteful that Perky has gone to the trouble of using Google Adwords to get a sponsored link for anybody searching a forum username? What an odious, vindictive little man.

It would appear that the user id's have been removed from the adwords although if you search on the posters real name (as it appears on the CPS website) it still comes up.

 

Just proves that CPS are reading this board yet again.

 

As they are reading these boards I'd like to leave a message for them.

 

Congratulations on your outstanding defeat in Oldham.

 

It's a bit difficult to prove who the contract exists with if you don't know who the driver was? Unlike the police you can't compel anyone to tell you and as you found out "we just know" doesn't quite cut the mustard as far as judge is concerned.

 

IMO you should sack whoever gave you the legal advice that said you had a solid case and should proceed to court.