Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Direct Legal & Collections / Egg Loan


turnedworm
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5905 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A while ago, when my business took a major downturn, I defaulted on my Egg loan. Over the last 18months or so it has been passed to Moorcroft and then onto Fredricksons. I spoke to Egg a couple of weeks ago to say I am in a position to start regular monthly payments - this was just after Fredricksons had handed it back to Egg.

 

Today, whilst away from my office, I received a call from Direct Legal & Collection asking me to repay the debt. I explained I am not in a position to pay the full amount or the large lump they were asking for. I asked for a statement of account to be emailed to me. They asked for £146 to halt legal action being taken.

 

When I got back from my travels I phoned Egg and asked how much is outstanding - c £2990. They gave me their "Client Liason Department" number. I shall be ringing them in the morning. I asked if they (Egg) had actually sold the debt and they said they had.

 

So I phoned DLC back and asked if they had bought the debt only to be told they hadn't and that they were dealing on behalf of Egg!!??:confused:

 

Now since my business doldrums of a couple of years ago I can afford c.£70 - 100 pcm. I do not dispute the debt and am not trying to avoid it. My main question is who should I talk to Egg or DLC?

 

Also are DLC similar to Moorcroft / Fredpay?

 

What are DLC most likely to do? In my telcon I said I would put together a household income / expenditure breakdown and send it to them.

 

Having read various posts I realise I should not have spoken to them.

 

Any thoughts most welcome! Thanks.

 

Turnedworm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Hello, Have you sent a CCA request regarding this loan, if not you could do so, from this you will discover if the agreement was properly executed. Later you might also consider sending a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), this will help you to discover what reclaimable charges were levied on the account Regards Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I have the original loan agreement in the office - is this the same. I can look it out tommorrow.

 

I received the letter from DLC today saying that if I didn't pay legal action "could" take place. Should I try to find out if the debt has been sold by Egg. If it hasn't then should I just start to pay money into the Egg loan account number and miss out DLC all together?

 

Is it unreasonable to ask Egg for a statement of account from the start of the loan?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received the letter from DLC today saying that if I didn't pay legal action "could" take place.

 

Yes and the Moon "could" be made out of cheese!!!

 

Send the CCA as advised and see what they come up with.

 

PV

LOWELLS-Stat Demand Set Aside-No CCA & Statute Barred-£1800-Gone Away-April 2008

 

Scotcall on behalf of Cabot-£2200-no CCA returned to Cabot-file closed-March 2009

 

Cabot-Court Claim issued despite no CCA and Stat Barred-Claim discontinued-March 2009

__________________________________________

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Direct Legal and Collections much much prefer to describe 'debts' that they've bought as still belonging to their 'clients'. If Egg has confirmed they sold it then they've sold it. DLC like hiding behind this nonsense.:mad:

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the link for the CCA request letter:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

It's letter template "N" you need.

 

Remember to send RECORDED to be signed for or SPECIAL DELIVERY.

 

DO NOT SIGN IT... PRINT YOUR NAME.

 

SEND A £1 postal order rather than a cheque (which would disclose your bank a/c details and signature).

 

Keep us posted.

 

PV :-)

LOWELLS-Stat Demand Set Aside-No CCA & Statute Barred-£1800-Gone Away-April 2008

 

Scotcall on behalf of Cabot-£2200-no CCA returned to Cabot-file closed-March 2009

 

Cabot-Court Claim issued despite no CCA and Stat Barred-Claim discontinued-March 2009

__________________________________________

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the link for the CCA request letter:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

It's letter template "N" you need.

 

Remember to send RECORDED to be signed for or SPECIAL DELIVERY.

 

DO NOT SIGN IT... PRINT YOUR NAME.

 

SEND A £1 postal order rather than a cheque (which would disclose your bank a/c details and signature).

 

Keep us posted.

 

PV :-)

 

 

Presumably I dont sign it as my signature may be "borrowed"?

 

Many thanks for the info thus far. I shall keep you posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just spoken to a chap at egg and it would seem that they have not infact sold the debt.

 

I have found my copy of the loan agreement form (the other copy was signed and sent off) - in Oct'04. It would seem that the principle loan was for £5000 and there is a Loan Payment Protection plan at £693.

 

When I signed up for the loan as "self Employed" do I have an argument that it was missold? I am still self employed today.

 

I shall be sending off the letter over the weekend. Should I make a token interim payment to show "good will" prior to receiving the requested info - chrges levied etc.

 

Thanks again my learned friends (virtual!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE-

 

I have made several calls to Egg and DLC today. I spoken to Egg about the PPI arguing two main points -

 

1. That a proportion of the amount should be set against the sum I'm being chased for.

 

And / Or -

 

2. The policy should not have been sold as I am self employed. Also wasn't made aware that 3rd party policies were available.

 

I am to write / email my complaint to the Customer Relations Dept who will look into it. I spoke to a very helpful chap who said it could take up to 8 weeks to determine the outcome of my complaint. I asked if DLC should hold on any legal action during this time and was told that under the Financial Ombudsman guidelines - they should hold off.

 

In the meantime I am awaiting a statement for the loan account to check any charges levied. As the proportion of the PPI does not get deducted automatically from the amount being chased I shall be checking all charges on the account VERY VERY closely.

 

I do want to pay the outstanding debt - but only that which is due and no more at a rate that I can afford!! Simple. It's a good job that people who build aeroplanes work in a more accurate way than these "banks"!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading various other threads I have realised that when DLC made their first call to my mobile I gave them some useful (for them info) - they asked if I am a homeowner and how many dependants etc!:o They even asked me to outline my household income and expenditure - at which point I suggested I would have to put that together over the next few days.

 

Does this make them more likely to go for CCJ action? If so should the dispute over the payment insurance be enough to put it on hold?

 

Views and ideas greatfully accepted!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...