Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. I am reading through the full thread and will continue to research. I have come across a reference to a form called N180 DQ in the thread, but I cannot see any reference to this form in my case nor can I see it on the MoneyClaim website. Should I have been sent this form? Thanks 
    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

stopped to look at map!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5949 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a PCN from Hounslow for a contavention "(02) Parked or loading/unloading in a restricted street where waiting and loading/unloading restrictions are in force" It was based on a video. It's a total surprise to me as what happened was that my wife and I stopped to check the map for 2 minutes and then carried on our journey. No one left the car, no one got in etc.

 

I don't know what i actually stopped in, but if there is video, it will show us stopping and then driving off 2 minutes later.

 

Is that really an offence? Do I have grounds for an appeal?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you post a copy of the PCN (with identifying details hidden) so that we can see if it's enforceable?

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a PCN from Hounslow for a contavention "(02) Parked or loading/unloading in a restricted street where waiting and loading/unloading restrictions are in force" It was based on a video. It's a total surprise to me as what happened was that my wife and I stopped to check the map for 2 minutes and then carried on our journey. No one left the car, no one got in etc.

 

I don't know what i actually stopped in, but if there is video, it will show us stopping and then driving off 2 minutes later.

 

Is that really an offence? Do I have grounds for an appeal?

 

Stopping for any other reason than to allow passengers in or out is classified as waiting (unless of course you are in traffic) and is a contravention where its prohibited by yellow lines.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I'll have to put it down to experience. Seems harsh though. Generally you get all this advice about "don't do XYZ but pull over", so instead of driving with a map in front of my face, I pull over and get £50 poorer.

 

Thanks for the advice though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is harsh and the symptomatic of the automated way this country is dealing with things. I'm sure a policemane would have been more understanding and may even have helped you find your destination.

 

Don't forget tiglet's post. The ticket may have errors cauing it to be unenforceable. If you can sacn it, remove personal details, then post it here some of the experts will take a look at it.

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could always advise them that you pulled over because you felt unwell and thought you were going to be sick, obviously it would have been unsafe to carry on driving at that moment.

 

After a brief respite you felt well enough to continue your journey and proceeded. Since no-one got out or entered your car it would seem plausible.

 

I suggest this because although it is illegal to stop on the hard shoulder of a motorway, you are allowed under law to pull over if you feel unwell and think you might be about to vomit.

 

If they still hold out for payment ask them what you were supposed to do in those circumstance, did they expect you to carry on driving, throw up and have/cause an accident.

 

Mossycat

 

PS Don't take it that I am suggesting that you tell a lie here, but we all feel ill from time to time don't we?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could always advise them that you pulled over because you felt unwell and thought you were going to be sick, obviously it would have been unsafe to carry on driving at that moment.

 

After a brief respite you felt well enough to continue your journey and proceeded. Since no-one got out or entered your car it would seem plausible.

 

I suggest this because although it is illegal to stop on the hard shoulder of a motorway, you are allowed under law to pull over if you feel unwell and think you might be about to vomit.

 

If they still hold out for payment ask them what you were supposed to do in those circumstance, did they expect you to carry on driving, throw up and have/cause an accident.

 

Mossycat

 

PS Don't take it that I am suggesting that you tell a lie here, but we all feel ill from time to time don't we?

 

 

Lying on a parking appeal is a criminal offence and considering the whole thing was captured on video getting hauled before the magistrates as well as a PCN suggesting faking illness is not really sound advice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lying on a parking appeal is a criminal offence and considering the whole thing was captured on video getting hauled before the magistrates as well as a PCN suggesting faking illness is not really sound advice!

 

Which part of 'I'm not suggesting you tell a lie' didn't you understand then?

 

Mossycat

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which part of 'I'm not suggesting you tell a lie' didn't you understand then?

 

Mossycat

 

Which part of I stopped to look at a map indicated the OP was ill?? If you wasn't implying he should claim it was the case why even bother mention it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was only 2 minutes, can you not claim you had pulled over, THEN realised you were in a load/unload space.

Appeal, it only takes a letter;)

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which part of I stopped to look at a map indicated the OP was ill?? If you wasn't implying he should claim it was the case why even bother mention it?

 

Your pedantic bickering isn't helping the OP or other people who may at some future date be in the same position.

 

When you learn the difference between infer and imply then you will understand why I don't need to address your inane point

 

Mossycat

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your pedantic bickering isn't helping the OP or other people who may at some future date be in the same position.

 

When you learn the difference between infer and imply then you will understand why I don't need to address your inane point

 

Mossycat

 

 

And your advice has helped who??? There are numerous exemptions for stopping on a loading restriction none of which apply to the OP, if you really wish to help why not list them all rather than just mention a medical emergency which obviously does not apply here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

And your advice has helped who???

 

Hmmm anyone who wasn't aware of that exemption, anyone who at some future date stops either on a hardshoulder or in a no stopping/waiting area and can quickly give good reason for why they have stopped.

 

I was given that piece of advice years ago and it has helped me, I passed it on hoping it would help others.

 

Mossycat

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the beauty of it. It wasn't illness nor was it a medical emergency 'per se' it was a very brief feeling of sickness during which you felt you might vomit. Since the feeling past quickly you did not need to consult a doctor, hence no documentary evidence would be required.

 

Speaking from experience I know this to be the case

 

Mossycat

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the beauty of it. It wasn't illness nor was it a medical emergency 'per se' it was a very brief feeling of sickness during which you felt you might vomit. Since the feeling past quickly you did not need to consult a doctor, hence no documentary evidence would be required.

 

Speaking from experience I know this to be the case

 

Mossycat

 

 

You obviously did not read my post there is NO exemption from parking restrictions for feeling ill. Councils MAY and 99.9% of the time will not accept it as mitigation unless its life threatening. Its the same as breaking down if the Council accepted everyones word for it without proof everyone would just claim to be ill or broken down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OP is new - let's not get into an argument which detracts from the issue and may put him off the forum please guys. :)

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And your advice has helped who???

 

 

And your advice has helped whom?:rolleyes:

 

 

For the OP, from what you have posted, you have committed a contravention and are liable. However, follow Tiglet's advice in post #2 and we can see if we can help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the help. Sorry to have provoked a few minor arguments! I'll try and get the scan together. Looking at it, the only minor detail is that the picture is timed 9:24:48 and the time of the offence 9:26. No doubt they can wind the video forward if they needed to, but does that help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with G & M.

 

To tell lies (even little ones) in order to escape a PCN is a very serious offence & just not worth the risk as you could end up being imprisoned for what originally was a minor transgression.

 

Why doesn't the OP just tell the truth. That he pulled over because he was lost & needed to consult a map. You never know the adjudicator might accept such mitigation & cancel the PCN.

 

Stranger things have happened

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the help. Sorry to have provoked a few minor arguments! I'll try and get the scan together. Looking at it, the only minor detail is that the picture is timed 9:24:48 and the time of the offence 9:26. No doubt they can wind the video forward if they needed to, but does that help?

 

 

You are correct parking is done generally by video and the photos are just to show you at the scene. Its a common misconception the photos provided show the arrival and departure with comments such as 'I was only filmed parked for 30 secs!'. The photos provided are stills taken from video and are timed only to show the contravention took place, for example you could park on yellow lines for 30 mins but the photos may still only be a minute apart.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...