Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Paid the £80 then they tried to get more money!!


jaymm
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5898 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was fined £80 for apparently not declaring SORN. I couldn't find copies of the paperwork to prove otherwise since it was 6 months ago, so I decided to pay the £80 and get on with my life.

So, on Friday afternoon I called to pay the fine. Firstly, it's an 0870 number you call and surprise surprise, a voice comes on and tells you how they are experiencing a high number of calls and the waiting time is 5 - 10 minutes. (The letter states that this is a payment only line, so if they are truly experiencing a high number of calls, they must be a very profitable organisation!!! - especially the influx of people who decide to pay at 4:30pm on a Friday afternoon!!!!! - peak time, eh??)

So, 9 minutes and 46 secs on hold and the call is answered. I told the brain dead moron that I was paying the £80 penalty and then he told me that there was also £30 of arrears!!!!! £110 total!!!!. Refraining myself from telling him exactly what he could do with his arrears, I told him that there was no mention of arrears and the letter was only for £80. He then told me that I can pay the £80 and that COULD close the case, but I could get a letter later chasing me the £30 arrears. I opted to pay the £80 only and take my chances.

 

They really are a shower of ********!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001
I was fined £80 for apparently not declaring SORN. I couldn't find copies of the paperwork to prove otherwise since it was 6 months ago, so I decided to pay the £80 and get on with my life.

So, on Friday afternoon I called to pay the fine. Firstly, it's an 0870 number you call and surprise surprise, a voice comes on and tells you how they are experiencing a high number of calls and the waiting time is 5 - 10 minutes. (The letter states that this is a payment only line, so if they are truly experiencing a high number of calls, they must be a very profitable organisation!!! - especially the influx of people who decide to pay at 4:30pm on a Friday afternoon!!!!! - peak time, eh??)

 

Its the end of the road for 0870. In many cases calling the landline is free Say No to 0870.com

 

 

So, 9 minutes and 46 secs on hold and the call is answered. I told the brain dead moron that I was paying the £80 penalty and then he told me that there was also £30 of arrears!!!!! £110 total!!!!. Refraining myself from telling him exactly what he could do with his arrears, I told him that there was no mention of arrears and the letter was only for £80. He then told me that I can pay the £80 and that COULD close the case, but I could get a letter later chasing me the £30 arrears. I opted to pay the £80 only and take my chances.

 

They really are a shower of ********!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...