Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Credit Security Ltd & Debt Managers HELP


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5465 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, hope everybody is having a good new year....so far....

 

I would be grateful if anybody could help me please.

 

I had a debt with Clydesdale bank which got put to debt managers who gave it to Credit security Ltd to collect. After reading these forums to get contact details etc....( i would like to thank all who answered my last query...very helpful )

I sent a recorded letter to the latter using the template from a previous thread with my £1 postal order asking for the relevant documents to be sent to me. The letter was signed for on the 3rd of December. I had not heard anything from them , and decided to phone them myself today 03-01-08 to find out why. They had processed the £1 postal order but not updated their records with my contact details or about the information i requested. They then said i had to get them myself from Clydesdale. I stated that i had already tried to do this in the past and Clydesdale had no information on the debt at all and that all paperwork would have been sent over to the collection agency. I went through the letter i sent about the sections in the consumer credit act and then they told me they would suspend the account and pass it back to debt managers. They then gave me a contact number.

I contacted debt managers and spoke to a lady who said that they did not have the necessary documents and that she would get the information from clydesdale and send them on to me.

Credit Security even put the £1 against the debt....which specifically stated in the letter not to do.

The lady at debt managers said she would remove the £1 from the debt.

 

WHERE DO I STAND WITH THIS ???

 

Has anybody dealt with debt managers directly before....

If they come back with all the paperwork...how do i get a final settlement figure....and what do i offer....

All help would be very much appreciated...

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are talking rubbish.

 

They are trying to claim money from you, they are trying to enforce the debt, so they are responsible for the production of the CCA, whether directly, or via forwarding on your request to the original Creditor. either way, it isn't your problem and they can't collect any money until they provide the CCA

 

The process is as follows:

You make your legal request for a copy of the executed agreement (CCA)

They send it to you and continue enforcement proceedings, you pay the debt

They fail to provide it and b*gger off into obscurity, you keep a little more of your hard earned dosh, or use the fact they can't enforce the debt to negotiate a full and final settlement.

 

Don't communicate with these people via the telephone, THEY TELL LIES and will say anything as they think that they cant be held accountable. make sure any communications are in writing only.

 

Don't remind them of their responsibilities, they're getting paid to do this, you aren't. Don't do their job for them. if they have defaulted, then you can legally withold payment until they produce the document

 

The clock is ticking

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

hi all,i wrote to credit security asking for a cca twice now,and both times have been totally ignored,today i receive a letter saying...unless they receive payment by noon 9th july a claim will be prepared for issue in the aylesbury county court for the debt....so is there anither letter i can send to these people,as my cca requests have been ignored???

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a follow up letter in the templates section you can send them if you wish,but I would just ignore them and report them to oft & trading standards. Incidently default of a cca is a complete deffence if they did try to go to court

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

here it is edit as needed

 

 

Dear Sirs

 

I refer to your letter of XXXXX 2008, the content of which is noted. No debt to your client is acknowledged.

 

On (date) I made a formal request to your client pursuant to s.78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. They have failed to comply within the statutory time limit, or at all. It should not be necessary to have to remind solicitors that the provisions of s.78(6) now apply.

 

In the circumstances, your/your clients threat of legal action would appear to be a breach of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 and the Office of Fair Trading Guidance on Debt Collection. Should you or your client bring proceedings, they will be robustly defended, and the Court's attention drawn to the above statutory breaches . Furthermore, I reserve the right to bring the conduct of your client to the Court when the issue of costs is being considered.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

I would still complaim to the oft & trading standads and let them know you are doing this

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...