Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Daft question - but you filed the defence on-line on MCOL as dx indicated, right?
    • We looked up the e-mail address so communications would be in writing.  If you do stuff on the phone the other party can just deny the contents of the conversation.  They can't deny what's written in an e-mail. So time to sort Pete out.  Check the following for accuracy and change anything I've got wrong.  Then e-mail Pete this evening.  I was thinking of threatening the pub with legal action but let's initially be nice.   Dear Pete, Re: PCN no.XXXXX, claim form no.XXXXX on 23 July 2022 I was a customer at your pub and I attach proof of purchase. I was picking up my cousin Ms XXXXX and her family as she was working as a cook with you at the time.  I entered the pub through the back door, went to the bar, and ordered a drink and a meal.  At no point did any bar staff alert me that I needed to add my registration number or did I see any signs advising me to do so.  I then took a seat outside in a small seated area so I could chat to my cousin while waiting for her to finish work.  We were joined by the management of the pub and bar staff during my time waiting  I was shocked a few days later when I received a demand for £100 from Civil Enforcement Ltd.  i contacted the pub and was told "don't worry, it's not enforceable". Well, that information turned out to be nonsense because I have now received a county court claim form from CEL. I contacted the pub again on XXXXX and was extremely disappointed to be told "there's nothing we can do". Of course there is something you can do.  You are the organ grinder.  You called CEL in.  You can call your dogs off.  Your pub has absolutely superb reviews on Google Maps regarding the way in which you treat guests.  Do you really think customers should be dragged to court?  I'm sure you don't. I am therefore requesting that you intervene and instruct CEL to cease court action. Yours, XXXXX
    • Thank you - Defence has now been filed Doc_20240501_182920_Redacted.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hello everyone I am at my wits end, glad to of found you all.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6008 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, I have never used this site before so please excuse me if i get anything wrong. Basically i do not know what to do? I had a loan with NatWest up until 2002. I was taken ill and had to stop work, the PPI was heartily unrealiable but the speed at which the premiums were taken remained the same, in a nut shell with only benefit as an income i was forced to default the loan to bring it to a close. Since then i have been tranferred through every debt recovery unit they have and finally with a company called Shoesmiths. I have battled ever since 2002 and am well again and working. However my income is hugely different. With charges and interest the bank claim i owe them £19000. I have no means of payment and currently give them £25 per month. The pressure is relentless and can see only bankruptcy as a way to bring this to close. I once offered the bank £15000 as a settlement, they refused and i no longer have acces to the money and to limit damage i sold my house and used the equity to settle £31000 with various other companies. Only Natwest refused and they are my single remaining debt. To Avoid repossesion threats i have moved into rental accomodation. I am not financially minded and simply do not know what to do as i feel constantly on the back foot.

I would be so grateful to anyone who has any ideas, as the threat of baliffs is on me again.

 

Hoping someone knows what to do

 

Nathan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they pay out on the PPI while you were ill?

 

With charges and interest the bank claim i owe them £19000.

Well the charges are unlawful so you can claim these back.

 

Try not to panic and take some time to have a look around the site.

 

Here are some links to help you around:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/69359-cant-find-what-youre.html

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

 

You may also wish to have a look at the PPI forum if you feel this has been missold. The link is here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/ppi/

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Goodness that was quick, thank you.

 

The PPI was paid but very erratically. Basically i would submit the medical information requested then wait for payment. This lead to premiums being deducted from account whilst there were no funds to cover them. All the usual penalities were then applied. The PPI would finally payout but by then i had racked up charges which were added to the debt. Tis pattern repeated over an over, until i stopped paying anything and cancelled the PPI as it was making the debt worse not better. The bank then removed some £3600 from the loan as they said this was a refund of the PPI. I felt i had no option as due to its unrealiabilty, the action i took brough the escalation of debt to a close. All correspondance i recieve up to this day warns me "interest contiunes to accrue but is not applied", so i feel i jumped out ot frying pan and into the fire.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ringodyle

 

You've obviously been through the mill and treated scandalously by our unethical banking community and others. That's the bad news of which I am sure you are only too well aware.

 

Now for the good news.

 

You've posted on this site and have, literally, thousands of people willing to help you.

 

Most will be excellent, but at the end of the day it will be up to you to decide what to do and how to do it.

 

Me? I've been there, in one case at least I'm still there but I want you to do two things which will not cost you one red cent - and I ain't selling anything.

 

First thing tomorrow I want you to telephone two free numbers:

 

0800 138-1111

0808 808-4000

 

Try from 08.00 onwards as the lines are busy.

 

You'll find yourself talking to the Consumer Credit Counselling Service and then National Debtline.

 

Be completely honest with them and one or the other - the choice is yours - WILL help you and it will cost you nothing as they are registered charities.

 

The first (CCCS) has proved to be a lifeline to me.

 

All I ask in return is that you post your experience on here (a moderator may move you to the Natwest site) and then try and help someone else in need of advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What year did you take the loan out?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be worth finding out if they have a copy of the credit agreement. They need this to enforce the account. If they don't have a copy or the copy does not conform with the Consumer Credit Act they can not enforce the account even in a court of law. This would make negotiating a settlement on the account a lot easier as you would be in a very strong position.

 

A template for the CCA request is here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html template N. Send it recorded with a one pound crossed postal order and don't sign the letter.

 

They then have 12 working days to produce a copy of the agreement. If they can't then after this time they default on supplying the agreement and can not lawfully take any action on the account until a copy of the agreement is produced.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, on all the income and expenditure forms it requests my partners income. Thats fine but the debt is mine alone and she never has been part of it. I do not take any of her income and we share 50/50 on costs. Is it necessary to declare her income on these forms?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it necessary to declare her income on these forms?

No, it certainly is not. As you have rightly concluded the debt is yours and yours alone. Her income is irrelevant as it has nothing to do with her. It is only your disposable income that is relevant.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've moved your thread to the Debt Collection Forum where you will be able to receive a lot more help and advice when needed.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...