Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help needed with CapQuest PLEASE!!


Dolly6

Recommended Posts

I have been in correspondence with CapQuest over a debt to the Alliance & Leicester. It looks like this is an unauthorized overdraft on an account I had with my husband from whom I am now seperated. It appears the overdraft was created by charges. I was totally unaware of any outstanding amounts with the bank and so have sent off the letter requesting the deed of assignment, bank statements etc.

So far I have had the standard 28 day letter back and one stating that there is no deed of assignment as they have not purchased the debt.

They have now also sent me a copy of the account application which shows no request for an overdraft. So far no statements.

It is now coming up to the 12+2+30 days and I am lost as to what to do next. Do I send the letter to them telling them they are in breach of the law? Or because it is an account, not a loan, is this different?

Obviously I want to know what the debt is made up of but do I ask the bank or is this admitting the debt?

Any help is very much appreciated as I am well and truly stuck:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA request is not really the best way to go here. You need to get all your bank statements to add up the charges you have accumulated, and start claiming them back.

 

you should send the bank a SAR request, to which they have 40 days to respond. you will need a 10pound fee with your request.

The template letter you need is here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/96518-data-protection-act-subject.html

 

your SAR will put the account into dispute with the original creditor, so you can tell the debt collectors to go away until this is sorted out. OFT guidelines say that they cannot continue their activities whilst the debt is disputed. You'll probably have to wait for the famed test case, but you should be able to keep the vultures off your back.

 

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

AS Oneofakind says, get a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) into the bank and go for the charges.

For CQ here's a letter to keep them off your back:

 

 

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Your ref:

 

 

Thank you for your letter of DATE, the contents of which are noted.

 

 

I am disputing the total value of these debts with BANK due to unlawful and unreasonable charges. As such, therefore, I consider this account to be in dispute and no further action shall be taken until this matter is resolved.

As per OFT guidelines Section 2.8k "not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt."

 

This process may take some time, due to the Office of Fair Trading's test case, but I will try to expedite this issue as a matter of urgency.

 

I hope that you will enter into a sincere dialogue with me about this matter and I am writing this letter to you on the assumption that you would prefer to do this than merely respond with standard letters and leaflets.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your replies. I haven't had any statements from the bank for years. Unfortunately, this situation is one of many I have found myself in because of my OH. He used to deal with the finances and hid all the post from me so that is why I am in the dark about how the debt is made up.

Would I be right in thinking that I need to write to the bank asking for the last 6 years statements before I send the SAR request?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A SAR should get you everything for your whole history with the bank. It's not unknown for a bank to claim they are only obliged to keep information for 6 years due to the Data Protection Act. This is total bowlarks, as the act contains no such ruling.

 

Claim back EVERYTHING they have charged you, no matter how far back it goes. (My bank charge claim went back to 1998.)

It's amazing how the interest on old charges mounts up!;)

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...