Spirittamer
-
Posts
12 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by Spirittamer
-
I can only suggest you read this thread again from the beginning. Also no names have been mentioned. All the opinions are conjecture but everyone is allowed such without threat of legal action.
-
My point exactly.
-
In my opinion with my vast amount of experience and knowledge, having an Advisory Sheet, that has been deliberately altered, in my possession and the faults on the vehicle to match the unaltered copy from VOSA, proof enough don't you think? Please read my previous post regarding legality of Advisories as I find that I will have to repeat myself.
-
I thought this forum was for persons to offer advice and insight, not to dis* Your reply starts by questioning (Do you actually know what you are talking about??) But then ends with totally agreeing (The OP states the dealer 'provided the warranty' which in fact, is an insurance policy making the dealer the 'broker'. The only part of your post that almost makes sense is the bit I have highlighted. Yes, the warranty should still be valid even if the dealer 'no longer exists'. ) which is what I was originally doing to your post, reinforcing your reply.
-
Doesn't the anti-corrosion warranty last longer than the mechanical warranty?
-
The warranty is a contract with the company supplying the warranty not the dealer who would of course furnish the repairs under the warranty and then claim back the costs from the warranty issuing company. The fact the dealer no longer exists doesn't change the contract of the warranty with the issuing company.
-
I know this is over a year old but can I just say "what a load of rubbish". If you bought a Hummer and then got home to find it didn't fit in your garage??? Mazda produce a vehicle that is defective but these defects can be hidden by driving in a certain way and having ridiculous service schedules with high cost and don't inform the dealers or salesman but it is still the customers fault? Wow
-
The contract is with Warranty Company not the dealer.
-
Correct. The warranty is a contract with the warranty company not the seller/dealer.
-
Ebay car, MOT failure
Spirittamer replied to stevieevil's topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers
Continue with eBay. Give them all the information. Opening a case should put a hold on the sellers money if paid by Paypal. If paid cash it will probably just lead to you leaving negative feedback and warning future potential buyers. -
Connif. You too seem to have missed the point. The MOT Certificate has been forged. It doesn't matter what the advisories were for. The Certificate has been altered as to deem the car mechanically 100% sound and to generate as much money from the sale using this forged document as a platform. It is not only deceitful it is illegal.
-
heliosuk. I have read some of your answers to other threads and must say you give some duff information. How can taking a legal document, altering/changing/copying that document as to not reflect possible repairs/faults in the future to aid the sale of an item, not be classed as forgery? emtom123 Give em hell!
- 29 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- car garage
- court action
- (and 2 more)
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS