Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

C.C.A question


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6522 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thats what I thought but I have heard that it is not, just need a bit of clarifaction.

 

which network are you on.

 

i used to work for vodafone and i'm sure they are cca regulated.

 

you can send off £1 asking for a copy of your agreement? it WILL tell you on there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will generally find that Mobile phone contracts are NOT governed by the CCA, just standard contract law.

 

If you read the T&C's of an average Mobile Phone contract it will merely state "Your Contract is to be interpreted in accordance with the Laws of England and Wales" .........It will therefore not be specificly regulated under the CCA.

 

This does not apply to all cases, but the 4 major networks all operated under this type of contract.

 

However your contract with the actual retailer / air time suppler may differ, best to check on an individual basis.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mobile Phone contracts are NOT under CCA - this is because theyre providing you with a 'service' on a monthly basis, and billing you on a monthly basis - it isnt an annual cost that is being debited from you monthly.

 

This is seen to be under 4 payments per year (obviously) so it not under the terms of CCA.

 

What is interesting though, is they are not seen as 'Credit' under CCA but how comes theyre allowed to report to Credit Reference Agencies?

 

Ive done alot of searching around for this file_wizzard, but unfortunately can never find the answer I need! :(

Matt

 

___________________________

 

HSBC - Received an offer... sent LBA.

Aktiv Kapital - Referring me to GE......

GE Capital - Completely Ignoring Me...

Orange - Send s.10 DPA letter! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Mobile Phone contracts are NOT under CCA - this is because theyre providing you with a 'service' on a monthly basis, and billing you on a monthly basis - it isnt an annual cost that is being debited from you monthly.

 

is this actually the case when you are generally tied into at least a 12 month contract

5th Jul 06 - Prelim sent to Halifax

20th Jul 06 - LBA sent (no response)

7th Aug 06 - Offer of £297 recieved. (declined offer)

10th Aug 06-revised date to submit moneyclaim (financial constraints prevented this action)

1st Sep 06 - Moneyclaim filed and issued

1st Sep 06 - recieved 2nd offer of £892 (after claim submitted)

5th Sept 06 - moneyclaim Acknowledged online

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then it begs the question: why do they have privileged access to the credit reference registers?

 

I'm not being funny, but should they have?

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can not agree more!!!!

 

There must be some avenue of recourse against them.. they must be accountable for information they provide to CRA's. Surely they are governed by some other regulations even if it isn't by the C.C.A.

It would all appear very maverick otherwise!!

 

I have found myself in a situation with O2.. i thought i had paid off an account with them a couple of years ago..didn't hear anything from them at all then i moved away.. checked my equifax file recently only to find a default registered against me with an oustanding amount. This was only registered in November last year after about 10 months of the file not being updated.

Obviously i didn't receive any default notice or any corespondance telling me there was an outstanding balance. i have raised a dispute with equifax, need to check experian though.

i have sent O2 a fax stating..

 

1. You must supply me with a true copy of the alleged agreement you refer to. This is my right under your obligation to supply a copy of the agreement under the legislation contained within s.78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 (s.77 (1) for fixed sum credit). Your obligation also extends to providing a statement of account.

2. You must supply me with a signed true and certified copy of the original default notice

3. Any deed of assignment if the debt was sold on

 

i received a the following reply from them

 

Thank you for your fax dated 05/08/06, we how ever need to to clarify which information you require, if it is ALL information we hold on your file, we will be more then happy to do this with in the 28 days stated by law under the freedom to information act, though this would have a charge of £10.

 

secondly, the legislation your quoted sir does not apply to mobile company's as our credit is no fixed.

 

If you have an issue with a default on your account we do have an internal department which deals with these issues called insight. to contact them please write to

 

Credit management

02

suite k

Arlington business centre

Millshaw Park Lane

Leeds, LS11 0NE

 

5th Jul 06 - Prelim sent to Halifax

20th Jul 06 - LBA sent (no response)

7th Aug 06 - Offer of £297 recieved. (declined offer)

10th Aug 06-revised date to submit moneyclaim (financial constraints prevented this action)

1st Sep 06 - Moneyclaim filed and issued

1st Sep 06 - recieved 2nd offer of £892 (after claim submitted)

5th Sept 06 - moneyclaim Acknowledged online

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will generally find that Mobile phone contracts are NOT governed by the CCA, just standard contract law.

 

If you read the T&C's of an average Mobile Phone contract it will merely state "Your Contract is to be interpreted in accordance with the Laws of England and Wales" .........It will therefore not be specificly regulated under the CCA.

 

This does not apply to all cases, but the 4 major networks all operated under this type of contract.

 

However your contract with the actual retailer / air time suppler may differ, best to check on an individual basis.

 

I have some queries on this matter..

 

1) it seems that mobile companies are not governed by the CCA just standard contract law. Surely there is some regulations/guidelines on how they input information on customers credit file.

 

2) I have read through all the T&C's i can find on o2 and nowhere does it mention any policy towards defaulted accounts.

 

3) Are mobile phone companies required by any legislation to supply a customer with a default notice before entering a default with the CRA's

 

4) This is just me being cynical but what stops a company manufacturing a signed and dated copy of a default notice when asked to supply one.

5th Jul 06 - Prelim sent to Halifax

20th Jul 06 - LBA sent (no response)

7th Aug 06 - Offer of £297 recieved. (declined offer)

10th Aug 06-revised date to submit moneyclaim (financial constraints prevented this action)

1st Sep 06 - Moneyclaim filed and issued

1st Sep 06 - recieved 2nd offer of £892 (after claim submitted)

5th Sept 06 - moneyclaim Acknowledged online

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

4) This is just me being cynical but what stops a company manufacturing a signed and dated copy of a default notice when asked to supply one.

 

i would also like to know

Link to post
Share on other sites

1) Auditors

2) FSA

 

You would be amazed at how much 'hidden' data there is a a computer document (especially a Word document).

 

Yes, they may try it on occasionally, but if seriously challenged then forensic computing will reveal the exact dates and times.

 

This has caught my wife out before now. As a secretary, she dates letters for the day they are to be signed - which is usually a day later than current date - she uses this date in the file name. She once did a search using the document created date and was most surprised not to find her document - which had a created (hidden) date earlier than that in the letter or file name

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...