Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

McIavelli V Lloyds TSB


McIavelli
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5962 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

McIavelli,

 

Lol, Experian already knows what you had for breakfast.

 

If your Experian file does NOT show a Default Notice from Lloyds I am not sure that is definitive proof none was issued. Experian depends for input from banks and cards, and some of the grander banks do not bother to pass on all their info, including Lloyds.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If you have a Lloyds credit card as well as bank account, and a Default Notice was issued, you would have known about it. Your card would have been stopped from use. Cards are administered in Brighton old TSB office separate from bank account, so ringing up Brighton with query is unlikely to get back to your bank manager.

 

If Lloyds did or did not issue DN, provided they continue with the policy of not notifying Experian, such an invisible DN would not hurt your credit status vis a vis the financial community outside the Lloyds group.

 

If no answer forthcoming you could check with the second biggest credit reference agency located in Bradford, I forget the name, others will know, for a standard £2, or free online?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Experian is in Nottingham, Equifax in Bradford. Between them they have the market sown up. There is a smaller setup in Scotland I think, but minor.

 

It also would cost nothing, to ring Lloyds Bank. You will get through to a Service Centre. If you pose an innocent generalised question, they may not insist on passing the query to your branch, e.g.

 

"I am thinking of a Lloyds loan to buy a flat in the medium future.

But I did go through a bad financial period from which I am now emerging. So that I know what I need to do, could you advise if a black mark has been put on my file to make house loan difficult."

 

"(Now in a nonchalant tone) for example was a Default Notice issued against me? It was? Are you sure? What was the date of issue?"

  • Haha 1

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could go for an indirect proof. If you buy a mobile phone in the high street the shop will try to open an account for you with Orange, T-Mobile etc. These companies will check online, probably with Experian, probably basing their decision to accept/refuse on the absence/presence of a D N. But if Lloyds issued a D N and kept it quiet inhouse, the phone companies also will not see it.

 

I am not quite clear why you want D N removed, if it was ever put on. You would not have anything like sufficient legal grounds to demand removal of D N, unless the D N was triggered EXCLUSIVELY by unlawful charges.

 

I.E. If unlawful charges had not been levied, your account would not have gone overdrawn without authorisation.

 

Good luck.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

bank charges over £5000

helpingmyson

Yesterday 22:05

by louis wu lastpost.gif

111Welcome to our forumthread.gif icon1.gifWhat if it looks like my charges total more than £5000 (multipage.gif1 2 3)

yogachick123

18th May 2007 13:47

by yogachick123 lastpost.gif

40481The Woolwich

 

 

The above are just 2 of the 52 threads found by clicking

Search

Advanced Search

input "5000"

select threads with "5000" in title

Begin search

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...