Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Joeyboo21 v First Direct


Joeyboo21
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6170 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all, just an update of where we are. Have done all the usual process, SAR/RFP/LBA and got stonewalled each time, have now filed on MCOL, did it on Friday 18/05, and have received a letter form the court this morning telling me the claim will be considered served on 26/05 and they have until 09/06 to react.... So watch this space! Next up Capital One and Halifax.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Joeyboo21,

 

Seems like we are in the same position. Mt claim was issued on 21st May and FD have until 9th June to reply. Let's see what happens shall we?!

 

L

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi guys, have checked MCOL this morning to find out that FD filed an acknowledgement on 1st June. So lets see whats next. Having just read the MCOL particulars of claim info from the Lulan v FD thread, my particulars were fairly brief given the 24/1080 limitations, and having 2 accounts with them. Does anyone think that I should flesh out my particulars and send a copy of the charges list, I believe that I have 14 days to do this from the date of service, if I require it. By the way for anyone that is going down the court route, I have loaned a book on the small claims procedure from my library called "A practical guide to the small claims court" by George Applebey 2nd Edition, which I have found enlightening. It explains all the options/forms and procedures in detail and has sections on preping for the hearing and at the hearing, if you should get that far!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, anyones help would be appreciated! Just as an enlightenment here is my original particulars as filed on MCOL:

 

Unfair and illegal bank charges including

excess overdraft fees, overdraft fees and

returned DD fees relating to 2 current

accounts, namely a/c number and a/c number. The

claim relates to charges dating back to

xx/xx/01 on a/c number and xx/xx/01 on

a/c number upto and including xx/xx/06 on

both accounts. We have contacted the bank on 3

occasions asking for a list of the charges,

request for payment and a letter

before action respectively. The bank

maintains that its charges are fair and

lawful, and therefore our claim is

unenforceable. It goes on to state that

under their 'Account Terms and Condtitions'

their fees and charges are clearly stated,

however our contention is that they are

breaching contract law by their charges not

being in proportion to their costs, so in effect

they are fining us. The claimants claim interest

under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984

at the rate of 8% a year from xx/xx/01 to xx/xx/07 of

£xxxx.

 

Anyones opinions would be grateful, especially given that if I am going to send another more fleshed out version, I has got to be by Friday! Thanks in anticipation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Joeyboo21 - After First Direct acknowledged my MCOL they submitted a defence. The Court wrote to me and I sent them suggested draft directions which you will find on this site, along with the covering letter. I also sent a copy to DG Solicitors. At this stage, I still have no Court date. Today, I received an offer from DG Solicitors for THE FULL AMOUNT I AM CLAIMING! (£4,027.00) They give the usual blurb about 'Without prejudice' etc etc.

 

If I can help you at all, do not hesitate to contact me. I have received all my information and support from this site and will be donating to the wuebsite fund as soon as my money is in the bank.

 

Good luck and hang in there, you WILL get yur money back.

Gensha

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Gensha I appreciate it. No doubt I will be in touch, I think I will wait to see what defence they put up, if any, and if they defend on grounds of not enough info I will submit an N244 to the court with a list of my charges and a fleshed out POC. The bank have already had these twice. Cheers, well done on getting your money back. Sre they sending you a cheque?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi! No I have asked them to put the money into my bank account within 7 days, and told them I will not write to the Court to withdraw the proceedings until the money IS in my account, and I have crossed out the confidentiality clause... The timing is great because I am going on holiday on 22nd June so the money will come in very useful! I had thought they would wait for a Court date (Which could be ages away) and then settle just prior to that, so I am not complaining!

 

I don't think there is any rhyme or reason to how they are managing claims, I just think that they are snowed under and some get through to the Court stage as a result, whilst others get settled more quickly. I definately think it is worth writing to DG every 10 days if you don't hear anything to demonstrate that you are giving them plenty of chance to settle before the Court date. Hope this helps, let me know if I can do anything else, I find once you have your own success, it spurs you on to want to help other people to get their money back and beat the bank!

 

CAN ANYONE DIRECT ME TO THE PLACE WHERE I CAN ENTER THE MONEY I HAVE WON BACK? I remember seeing it somewhere but can't think where? Also how do I donate to the site once the money is through?

Gensha

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, still waiting for FD to file a defence(got until 1600 25/06), I am expecting them too, so the court bundle work starts in earnest! Does anyone have a copy of the TC's for 1998/99? They would be greatly appreciated, I do have the 2003 ones, but would like the a/c opening year ones aswell (greedy I know). Power to the people!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi everyone, just a quick update. I have checked MCOL when I got home tonight to find they have filed their defence, so watch this space...........

 

Anyone got T&C's from 98/99 please.........

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to mention, in response to my questions about my POC, and having read Dubliner10 v FD, I have filed an updated schedule of charges with court and DG, as per GuidoT #21. Cheers GuidoT. Sent 2 sets of charges, the original ones that FD got with my RFP/LBA letters and updated, more in depth ones, as of date of sending. Just waiting to hear from court now..........

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all

 

An update to my case, having recieved the AQ from my local CC(even though the judge at Northampton Bulk ordered that it be dispensed with) I duly filled it out, at the same time I filed a N244(request to vary the amount claimed) because my lovely wife missed a few(£700+ and int.) charges, to be fair I missed them on checking too. So off I sends my completed AQ with the new draft directions and the N244 along with the £100 and £65 fees. So, the first ballsup, gets the cheques back, I forgot to sign them, Doh! Then off I send them, and the next day I gets the N244 back, forgot to sign that, was I awake when I filled these things out!(have checked all the forms and they are pretty good!). Then...... thanks to an unauthorised transaction on my account, it appears that the £65 cheque cleared, but nobody can tell me what has happened to the £100 cheque(not enough funds to clear it, by pennies!) So today I went to the CC to hand deliver the N244, signed this time! and offered to pay the £100 in cash. They said to wait and see if the cheque has bounced, and they will send me a letter to come in and pay in cash, otherwise they would get confused. So when this all works itself out, I wonder if the OFT case in the High Court will affect the hearing date? Oh by the way if the cheque has bounced the £39 charge will be added to my claim from the Halifax!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...