Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
    • As long as we are clear . Do the reading and post your letter of claim in draft form as requested and we can go from there.    
    • Hold on @BankFodder, that was a bit harsh. I spoke with the EVRi complaints Facebook group to begin with, a user on that group told me to send a letter but didn't give any specifics. Here at CAG, I was looking more for specific help as I've never raised such a claim before, and wanted to be sure that my claim was correct, which is why I've researched information with the other groups too, to be sure; but you seem to have assumed that I've made some form of contact with the other groups, such that I find your comments and tone to be very unfair. And I do know a thing or two about forums, that forum users are unpaid volunteers, I happen to be a Tableau Ambassador, and so perform a very similar role helping others in an unpaid capacity  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

A question if I may...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6582 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I'm fairly new around here - I've been lurking for a while but have only just started posting so please bear with me if I appear a bit dense on occasions. :oops:

 

I have just begun to wage war on Smile and Lloyds TSB to (hopefully) recover my own charges and I am now about to wage war on the Halifax on behalf of a family member who has been stung with ridiculous charges on both his current account and his credit card.

 

I've had a good read in the appropriate forum areas and have read the FAQs but so far I haven't been able to find the answer to this question:

 

My family member is currently on a DMP (debt management plan) and the banks concerned are among the creditors being repaid on said plan - is he still eligible to pursue those banks in respect of unfair charges? Even though he has debts with those banks, the charges were still unfair (and, in some cases, have been instrumental in him getting into financial trouble in the first place)...

 

I have assumed that he can make a claim for the unfair charges but I just wanted to make sure before I advise him to start the ball rolling...

 

Thanks.

 

Glynis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes.

 

However, whatever money gets refunded will probably have to go in the pot to repay creditors, or even just repaid into those bank accounts where he is in debt, but that's still helping getting out of debt. :)

 

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

i read this post with interest as i am about to embark on a debt management plan and because of the ridiculous charges the halifax have brought about have made them go on it in the first place! (halifax are one of my creditors).

however I have treated them separately at the moment, the halifax is on my dmp and i have sent the letter before action to them, if you are already paying them i dont see a problem, as somebody suggested it does reduce the debt in the end if they were to pay it straight into the account, if they send you a cheque you have the opportunity to decide. i wait with interest to see what they are going to do with my case as they have now shut my account, but when i had the gesture of good will there is a box to say pay into account or pay by cheque, im waiting with baited breath,

 

hope this helps in some way

 

good luck with yours

 

power to the people:)

Halifax preliminary letter sent 17/05/06 charges £2661.00

Bog Standard blah blah blah letter received 22nd May 2006.

received lengthy letter dated 24th May 2006 offering £605 pah!

letter before action sent registered 5th June 2006

letter received in response to lba offering £1801.00 errrrr no ta

court action filed 23rd June 2006

deemed served to bank on25th June 2006

notice of acknowledgement of service has been filed

they intend to defend

7th july received letter PAYING IN FULL!!!

 

10th July cash deposit £112.58

10th July cash deposit £2869.00

:D :D :D :D

 

HALIFAX SETTLED IN FULL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone. That's been very helpful.

 

We didn't want to rock the boat with the DMP but, at the end of the day, he only has so much surplus income each month and, no matter how awkward the Halifax get, he can't be forced to pay more than he has.

 

I think it will be worth a try, as you rightly say, it will reduce his debt if nothing else and the debt has been mainly caused by ridiculous charges.

 

I'll keep you posted and thanks again:)

 

Glynis

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...