Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I decided on confrontation - which I hate.  Omg the arrogance of the driver.  They refused to say who had given them the alleged permission to park on the private land - unless I proved ownership.  I couldn't believe they could be so objectionable.   They advised they couldn't take public transport to work as they lived too far away.  They couldn't rent a local garage as none were available. I simply said that's their issue not mine. It was infuriating that this person had such misplaced entitlement.  However I decided to humour them and show them the title deeds.   They couldn't respond.  Although at this point they alleged some guy in a city up north - whose name they couldn't remember - gave permission!!    They then asked if they could buy the garages and land!! Yet can't afford to park on a meter !! They seemed to back down and agree to now park elsewhere.  I hope so. 
    • I've worked out the contractor invoiced apx 250k - Without adding vat to the invoices.  So based on above he should have added vat to all invoices once he reached 85k?  Obviously he had to pay his labourers - would those payments get taken off what he received?  Or it doesn't matter cos he invoiced for the high sum?
    • Greetings, I'm writing to seek assistance with an ongoing issue I'm having with Manchester Council.  I parked my car in a residential area behind Wilmslow Road to go purchase some food, not realizing it was a no-parking zone. I later received a letter stating I had failed to make the required payment, and the penalty had increased. I appealed the fine, explaining that I had parked there but never received the original Penalty Charge Notice (PCN), so I was unaware of the need to pay. However, the council's reply did not address my initial concern. Is there anything I can do in this situation? I admit to parking there, and I was willing to pay the original fine, but I don't think it's fair for them to demand a doubled amount when they failed to send me the initial PCN.  Any advice or guidance you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance for your assistance.   MK Document.pdf
    • If you look at some of the other debt related threads will see that one of the first things which will be asked will be for you to list out your debts in a brief chronological order, including date of debt, amount, creditor, amount outstanding, defaulted – yes/no – date of default, date of last payment made, have you acknowledged the debt at all to the creditors. That lot at least. I expect that my colleague @dx100uk will be along but will meet to know at least that information
    • Hi, I have found this group very helpful hence I am here seeking help and advice.   I got myself into a situation where I have now more than £50k in unsecured debts (personal loans & credit cards) and things are now getting out of control as I am struggling to make payments. This is purely my own created situation and I am taking 100% responsibility for it. I am keen to get out of this situation as soon as possible hence I would appreciate any help and advice in this process. I am employed at the moment and don’t want to risk going into IVA or bankruptcy as this would risk losing my job. Being sole bread earner of my family, I cannot afford to lose my job. I have been trying to keep up with the payments so far and had few missed payments instances until 3/4 months ago but got caught up with missed payments somehow using my savings. All my debts are still with original lenders. However I know I am getting into same situation again shortly and won’t be able to get out of it again. I have started exploring Debt Management Plan (DMP) option through StepChange but haven’t submitted it yet. Based on budgeting, I have around £820 available to make payments to all lenders after taking care of all other essential expenses. This is definitely lot more affordable than what I am currently paying to different lenders. 1. Is DMP right option for me in current situation? 2. what are the negative consequences of availing DMP? 3. is there something else that I can do to get out of this situation? I’m determined to clear out all my debts but need bit of breathing space and time. Let me know please if you need any additional information. Thanks in advance for all your help and guidance. MM  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help! Ltsb Defending Claim! (scotland)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6238 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:D Good News at last. Hubby called SC&M this afternoon in a last ditch attempt to settle our claims. They have paid the money into his account this afternoon inc 8% interest! Phew!

Now getting to work on our Wasted Costs Claim (following the step-by-step instructions def :oops: )

I know we were lucky with this one, I just want to say thanks to those that helped esp stevokenevo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks. Received a letter from Lloyds this afternoon (not SC&M) with details of the settlement they paid yesterday. Its quite a funny letter - "the bank intends to defend this claim", "there is no merit in your claim" blah blah blah and then "oh by the way we have put £x into your account today as full and final settlemnt of the claim" :D

Anyway, they have given us 4 "conditions we have to meet in order to get the money eh, that they have already given us :rolleyes: .

 

2 points concern me -

1) "The payment will be in full and final settlement of the claim" Does this mean we wouldn't be able to claim in the future for other bank charges?

2) "The terms of this agreement are confidential...." Well no I dont think so. Im not comfortable with them dictating terms to us when we where the ones bringing action against them!

 

Can anyone confirm the 1st point? Is that what it means? Cos while we have been doing this claim, they have taken lots more charges!! (Prob trying to recoup their costs!) :mad:

 

A

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats what it is supposed to mean, what i did was just fired my next claim straight into the court without hesitation.

 

A while back when more people were making multiple claims, they would send the letter back with the points they didnt like scored out and initial'd.

 

Janet-M took them to task and insisted on the settlement being without condition, dont know if it made any difference to her in the end, just the principle i think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Stevokenevo sorry wasnt on yesterday, basically your offer with conditions attached is as follows

If you were to claim again for previous charges before the settlement date they would use this against you. In the future if you accrue further charges simply go through the same procedure as there is no mention of charges in the future or your running of the account in the future, some banks have attached conditions such as this is your settlement in full and we expect you to run your acount in line with our terms and conditions and they try and use this to deny a further claim and if a further claim is made they may close the account you have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry, they did add the condition about "running the bank acc according to T&C's etc" (didnt note before as didnt think they were important)

 

What do you reccomend we do regarding these and our next claim?

 

Note with the letter they sent, there was nothing to sign and send back

 

:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

basically your offer with conditions attached is as follows

If you were to claim again for previous charges before the settlement date they would use this against you.

 

Settlement date? Dont know what you mean Bigmac. Sorry:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

The settlement date is the date they pay your claim.

 

Some banks like the yorkshire and clydesdale banks have been defending second claims on the same account, on the basis that you should have claimed all your charges in a one'r.

 

LTSB have not jumped on this band wagon yet, so, taking into consideration all the things you have been through so far, i would suggest if you have more charges to reclaim, you get the claim in asap.

 

I know you had two claims in at the one time and the first has been settled, when is the second due??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve - they settled the second claim at the same time as the first :grin: . Thats what I meant by us being very lucky.

 

The "running your account properly" condition is a grey area as the new lot of charges where accrued before the recent settlement/conditions.

 

You think we should proceed with the claim asap then? (We have already issued a LBA a few weeks ago).

 

Should I just continue to send LLoyds/SC&M my letter revoking their conditions...what can they do? Take their money back...dodgy ground for them if I took it back to court!:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats great news, they settled bot your claims at once, i didnt realise that!!

 

Yes get your next claim in ASAP.

 

dont worry about any more LBAs or anything, they have had enough time, and seeing as they are still charging you means they have not learned a lesson.

 

To be honest, i wouldnt bother with a letter RE the conditions, unless the letter says you have an amount of time to respond i.e if we dont hear from you in 8 weeks we will take it you have accepted the conditions blah blah

 

And finally, dont worry, they cant take your money back again ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats cool thanks. The 14 days stipulated in the LBA is up on Monday, so we will fire the next claim to the court then.

 

In the first 2 letters sent to LLoyds re this 3rd claim, the amount was for £450, but the have charged another £200 since then. When we are putting our claim into the court next week, can we claim for the updated amount or does it still have to be the £450?

 

You would think I would have a clue about this by now eh??:wink::???::roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...