Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HSBC and the new FOS complaints procedure


ScarletPimpernel
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6269 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just sent a SAR to HSBC so that I can reclaim charges.

 

No doubt coincidentally, a couple of days after my visit to a branch for various bits of information, I received a peremptory letter from my branch to the effect that they were unable to contact me by telephone, and would I therefore contact them. A couple of days later I am handed a letter addressed to 'The Occupier', in which HSBC say that they understood that the Scarlet Pimpernel lives at Blakeney Hall, but they 'now believe that this information is incorrect'; they ask whoever gets the letter to contact them. So I rang, and an offshore call centre said that it was to do with an HSBC credit card. I told them I don't have one, and they insisted that not only must I have one, they won't talk to me unless I give them the number and expiry date (of the card I don't have...). Requests to speak to a manager were ignored. So, I rang the complaints department, and was told that someone would contact me.

 

They haven't, so a week later I have phoned them to check progress. I expressed surprise that HSBC have not acknowledged my complaint in writing by the end of the next working day, as required by the new FOS rules, which are backed by the CCA 2006.

 

They told me that their policy was to try to respond within 5 working days; my assertion that legislation has precedence was met with evasion worthy of a New Labour politician. No, they weren't prepared to answer my question; no, I couldn't speak to anyone else in that department; no, they wouldn't give me the number of any department in HSBC that deals with compliance; no, they wouldn't give me the number of head office - I could look it up on the internet!

 

So, I rang their legal department, explained my concerns, and within 10 minutes a senior customer services manager called me back. She was completely unaware of the CCA 2006 and the FOS scheme.

 

They're going to call me back tomorrow...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...