Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Metropolitan Collection Services Ltd


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6178 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I find it absolutely incredible that anyone representing a creditor and advising on matters of law, is NOT fully conversant with the CCA 1974. I include both the creditor's in-house legal team, and any solicitor advising said creditor.

 

This begs several questions then, not least of which is, are we really expected to believe that this is an act of incompetence to make the statements as witnessed by Richard? And if it is not down to ignorance of an Act, which with all due respect should be bread and butter to these people, what other explanation could there be? Might I go so far as to suggest that any company who replies to a debtor that the Act specifically excludes the requirement to comply with the Act, is guilty of attempted fraud?

 

I would welcome any other interpretation, as it is quite possible I am being somewhat naive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry Liz, I almost forgot this thread since I hadn't subscribed.

 

Yes, if they are in default, and as the debt is in dispute, you certainly may cease payment. Write to them telling them that this is what you aee doing, along with the reasons for doing so. And it might be useful if you add in that, of course you will be more than willing to recommence a payment regime, as and when they can prove to your satisfaction the validity and true amount of any debt that may in fact be owed.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I don't think so Liz.

 

But it should be as simple as writing something like...

as you have failed to comply with my request under the CCA 1974 within the prescribed time frame, I am now writing to advise that you are in default of said Act.

 

As such, I am entitled to cease payments until this dispute has been resolved. I am doing so with effect from this date.

 

Something like that.

 

When was it you sent off your CCA? If it was after 6 April, you will be able to make a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman. In which case, you might like to include in your letter something to this effect. eg

 

You will please let me have details of your complaints procedure, as I am now intending to make an official complaint to the Financial Ombudsman.

 

Their complaints procedure will normally be around 8 weeks, and after this time, or if they send you a letter that amounts to a full and final as far as they are concerned about the outcome of your complaint, bang your complaint in to the FOS. There is a form to download off their site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...