Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HSBCrusher v HSBC - The Battle continues.. claim 4 ready to go!


HSBCrusher
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5867 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been reading this fantastic website for a while now. I extracted the last 6 years' worth of information out of HSBC, and there is quite a whack of money taken, nearly 3 grand in total.

I have sent off the first letter (that was in your library), then I sent off the LBA 14 days later (got a rubbish standard "we are dealing with your complaint blah blah blah... and a nice leaflet as a reply). There is just over a week to go before I put in a claim in the small claims court.

Am I right, but does anyone think that these guys have been actually cranking up the charges the past few weeks? :x

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 604
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello! great to meet you.

In my case the charges have not really gone up, it's just they seem to be applying them more, with tactics, making sure you go over just a little, and then bounce everying else. So they get their £125, and then lots of £30 bouncy charges, (or those "card misuse" fees, definitly some sort of penalty rather than cost) very profitable. Funny, they then bounce all payments except the bank charges. If there are insufficent funds to pay your car insurance, how is there enough to pay the charges?

In any case, the only reason there is not enough money is because of last months harvest.

:-x

Just one other thing- do you think they are likely to close my account?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here we go.

I have this morning received the standard "you still get free banking blah blah why are you comlaining blah blah we do not agree the charges imposed by the bank constitute a penalty clause blah blah blah" from a Mr Johnson. I have seen this standard letter already here on this website, so I am not deterred.

It ends "I hope that matters have now been resolved to your satisfaction." How can it be? Where's my money?

Not a penalty clause? Why call the charges "card misuse fee"? The word "misuse" surely implies just this?:|

Do I just put in the claim on the 14th day, or will another letter be needed about how I am now on the phone to the local papers.....:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a peek at some other letters on this site that have been written in this instance, this is a cut and paste type letter I am going to send.

Should I bother, or should I just go ahead and claim?

I suppose another letter would show I mean buisness, and could result in a pay out?

 

 

 

Dear Mr Johnson

 

Many thanks for your letter dated 26 May 2006.

 

I am dissapointed that you will not return the money you have taken from my account.

 

My claim is for £XXXX.XX in punitive charges unlawful in Common Law.

 

I shall be sticking to my original timetable, giving the bank until 6th June to satisfy my claim in full, and unconditionally. If I do not receive a satisfactory response from you by this date, I will proceed to issue a claim for recovery of this sum in the courts, plus additional charges you have made recently, plus any costs, plus £XXX.XX in interest

 

 

Yours Sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am now in the process of filling in my moneyclaim form.

When you kick the box concerning claiming interest a message comes up saying that I should include this wording...

The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from {date when the money became owed to you} to {the date you are issuing the claim} of £ {put the amount} and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of {enter the daily rate of interest}.

What do I enter for the last bit, daily rate of interest?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Moneyclaim sent off today, processed for tomorrow.

What a pain trying to fit it all in the box! (24 lines)

Reading around, I feel it might be a good idea to send the bank a recorded delivery letter telling them I have taken this action (so there is no problem with the bank saying they didn't get a chance to fight!)

:D :D :D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best course of action is the one you are taking - don't let them divert you...you are about a fortnight from your money.

 

Just got a letter back from the court, they intend to defend.

They now have 28 days in which to offer a defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Mike.

They are counting on people giving up at this stage.

This is so unfair that folks have to go through all this to get money back that was taken illegally.

:mad:

I will be going the whole way, so watch out HSBC, Crusher is coming for you!

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Crusher,

 

Looks like we are on an identical timetable. However, I'm not sure if you were offered anything before taking it to moneyclaim. For some obscure reason, they offered me over 80% of my original claim, which just seems stupid that for the sake of another £200, they could have saved themselves court expenses AND interest.

 

Oh well, it suits be, the interest alne is £400.

 

Maybe we'll get our money back on the same day?!?!

 

 

All the best, I'll be watching...

 

No offer for me, I just had a "get lost" letter.

I am led to believe that they will not wait the 28 days and make a full offer as posted earlier in my thread.

I am quite happy they didn't just pay up, like you say now I get the interest too as a bonus.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't a clue what HSBC are up to! You filed your claim on June 5th, for issue June 6th and service presumably June 11th. They've already acknowleged your claim.

 

My claim was issued May 26th, served May 31st AND STILL NOT ACKNOWLEGED!!!

 

OC

 

Must be down to volume of claims.

These will go through the roof I would imagine after the Trevor Mc Doughnut programme.

The acknowledgement actually came back on the 8th, I filed on the 6th, so very quick.

It might be an idea to send a letter to them stating the action you have taken, and that they will be receiving paperwork from the court. There seems to be an issue arising of some folks getting a judgement set aside because the bank has "lost" the paperwork and not had a chance to defend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they fail to acknowlege I can apply for judgement after 14 days but I don't really want to win by default. Ultimately it has the same outcome but I either want them to acknowlege that I'm going through this process and offer settlement (because even though they say "without admitting ...." they are still sort of acknowleging they agree that their charges are wrong) or for it to proceed to court for a full hearing. The latter option, regardless of whether or not I win, means I've had my day in court and have made a point.

 

If I win by default it just means that their internal processes have failed and doesn't provide any sort of moral victory. As useful as the money would or will be, it's the moral victory that matters the most.

 

OC

 

the moral victory, I agree, is most important.

there is where the satisfaction lies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, now it becomes interesting.

A letter comes today, offering me half.

Its the standard "we feel confident we will win blah blah etc" that we have seen so many times before on this forum. (thats the beauty of it isn't it).

I will be replying that I accept the money as a down payment and will still be coming for the rest. After all, legal action has started now, why not bring it to conclusion? It's my money they have.

Now, my question is...

there have been exta charges added the past few days, is it possible to add these to the claim? I can't see how really.

I suppose I will have to start a new claim against them when this one completes?:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Gordon.

Yep, I will have no overdraft when refunded.

I will mention the extra charges in my letter, and make it absolutley clear that another legal action will be coming their way if the charges remain!

You heard anything yet?

 

Crusher- (you'd better believe it!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

People all over are being offered the full amount, 80%, huh, see if I care.

 

 

Anyhow, this is the letter I will be sending

What do you guys recon on this???

 

Dear XXXXX,

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: XXXXXXXX

I thank you for your letter dated 13th June 2006.

I wish to accept your offer of £XXXX as an installment towards the full amount owing, £XXXX, which if paid in full will cause me to cease my court action against HSBC

I am entirely confident that the charges imposed by HSBC are completely unreasonable, and that a court would agree with this statement.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5867 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...