Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Ajjars V egg


ajjars
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6189 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Just realised I have not started a thread with egg.

Back in December we missed our monthly payment on the 23rd due to charges being taken from our Bank account (£1200 in 3 months - which we got back in full in Feb, without filing at court). The payment to egg was less than £10. egg added charges of 2x £16 for unpaid D/D and £16 for a late charge. The Bank charged us 2x £39. So, for a payment of £9 odd we incurred charges of £126. Plus the payment was still outstanding. I emailed egg and explained that I could not meet the payment with all the charges. I asked them if as a gesture of goodwill if they could waive the charges to enable me to meet the minimum payment. They said no. I couldn't make the payment they asked for, including all the charges.

 

On 12th January we received a default notice from egg. At this point the account was less than a month in arrears. Emails were exchanged back and forth but they were adamant they would not waive the charges. So finally in desperation I sent a SAR to them. I also explained that the account was in dispute. Got a letter back on 9th Feb saying "we are looking into your complaint". Got another one the same day saying "your egg card account has been terminated"! It was terminated with a balance of £575. In December the balance was £480 - within the limit of £500. So the rest was all charges that had been added since December.

 

Then on 18th feb got a letter from the infamous H L Legal. It was a letter with a "case" number, the threat of their representatives coming to levy on my assets, and a charge of £150 being added to the account. Needless to say they got a very short sharp letter the next day. Basically egg have been out and out a******es, they don't give a damn. I think once they got my SAR they knew what was coming and passed this straight to the debt collectors. Capquest are now dealing with it, although a letter to them about eggs antics have kept them quiet. The SAR request compliance was late. We had to fight the secure message I.D issue, but eventually we got the statements (and everything else!)

 

My LBA was sent off in the week, and I will be filing at court without further notice to egg. I am claiming in excess of £1500, Oh and I forgot to mention the default that appears on our file after a string of green payments. No missed payments showing on the file at all, all showing up to date then BANG! a default. As the charges amount to much more than the default balance, that will be my lever to get it removed. There has been much more in the way of correspondence but this is the gist of it!

 

Sorry its so long - but as you can see egg are total a***s. They are not responsible lenders. When I asked for help right at the beginning of this sorry saga - where was it??

 

Anyway - wish me luck! lol

 

Ajjars

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well nothing much to report. LBA is up. Will file at court at the end of the month (lack of funds right now!). CCA'd Capquest (who are now in default) strangely tho - they have written to say they have put the account on hold for a further 28 days. Can it be that they don't have the agreement? Me thinks that is the case! Funny they wouldn't give us peace before ........

 

we have just been totally ignored by egg. No offers, no nothing! Oh well .... the wait will be worth it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Quick up date,

 

Haven't managed to file at court yet (had a badly needed holiday to fund!). In the meantime we have been getting letters from ARC debt collectors. Then a letter from Trevor Munn solicitors last week. They said they were going to take us to court, get a CCJ, blah, blah, blah. I wrote to Trevor and Co and explained the situation, that it is indeed egg who owe us money and that court action is imminent. Got a reply this morning from ARC to say that they have closed the account and sent it back to egg, and that they have instructed Trevor Munn to close the account as well. Small victory there then! Egg think they can bully and threaten us with their debt collectors. Not so!!!

 

Will be filing at court as soon as the good old Woolwich cough up (gone past AQ stage, just waiting for a court date). We will be claiming penalty charges plus the default removal which was placed on our file all of a few days after missing a payment.

 

Anyway, will keep this up dated!

 

Cheers Ajjars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recent winners showed Egg to have become very enlightened, not at all obstructive in paying out if you send Eggmail or letters similar to the winners. Egg more than once volunteered to add on interest not asked. The latest winner taking 2 weeks from beginning to end, one winner needed only one week.

 

Nonstandard claims though, like Default removal have been known to take a very long time.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...