Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • can't levy the fees then. the NOE must go to your present and correct address. no ifs or buts 
    • just to clarify matters, but once you have complained now/and asserted your rights under the act for this to be paid by 'them' FOC to you, should the vehicle again fail for anything related to the damage done by the incorrect fitting of the windscreen before you purchased then you CAN exercise your right to reject.  is the car specifically identified on the finance agreement? dx  
    • Thanks Dx    merely trying to avoid the fees added considering the circumstances.    Will ring the council tomorrow 👌
    • With 6,000 bank branches closing since 2015, Labour has announced its commitment to bringing more banking hubs to Britain's high streets.View the full article
    • you could have moved within that time in the same complex. have you this in writing - did you request a copy of the judgement CCJ AND Claimform from northants bulk?   it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge dx
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

What do I do next please?


SuJ
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6296 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:confused:

I received a letter today from cobbets saying I have not 'shown reasonable grounds for bringing the claim' and that they will be asking the court to strike out the claim 'Puruant to CPR Part 3.4 (2) (a)

 

What shall I do? Do I just send another set of schedules of charges to the court and Cobbetts?

 

Please help

Thanks for your time all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cobbetts sent me a letter saying I have not produced evidence to prove that I hvae ' reasonable grounds for bringing the claim', Pursuant to CPR Part 3.4 (2) (a)

 

what do I do? Shall I send another set of schedules to them and the courts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you please set out what stage things are at?

 

Have you had a defence?

 

Have you had a part 18 request from Cobbetts?

 

Which track has your claim been allocated to?

 

Have you had any directions from the court about what documents you need to supply and when (e.g. when to send a bundle)?

 

(will need more details but what exactly depends on your answer to the above)?

If in doubt read the

FAQs

 

If still in doubt - ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Power to strike out a statement of case 3.4 (1)In this rule and rule 3.5, reference to a statement of case includes reference to part of a statement of case.

(2)The court may strike out (GL) a statement of case if it appears to the court –

(a)that the statement of case discloses no reasonable grounds for bringing or defending the claim;

(b)that the statement of case is an abuse of the court’s process or is otherwise likely to obstruct the just disposal of the proceedings; or

©that there has been a failure to comply with a rule, practice direction or court order.

 

Does this help you ? This is the part of CPR cobbetts are trying to scare you with. If you have done everthing as per the http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/31460-example-step-step-instructions.html.You you have nothing to worry about.

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a court date this month for cardiff, which I found odd because I am also taking on Barclays and I have been given exactly the same time and date . It is the small claims court as it is just under £5000. I don't recall ever having a Part 18 request.

It has all been going on for so long I'm doubting myself, but I've followed the same steps for three banks, I won against Halifax, they paid up before it went to court, I've heard nothing from Barclays, but am getting these threatening letters from Cobbetts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my POC, it is the same as I used for ny other two claims too.

 

Re-claiming unfair bank charges imposed in

the last six years. The claimant claims

interest under section 69 of the County

Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year

from date when the money became owed to me

to 3/11/06 of £ 3941.00 and also interest

at the same rate up to the date of judgment

or earlier payment at a daily rate of 8%

 

If this is insufficient does that mean I will lose this claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends how closely they're looked at - they are extremely vague. If Natwest/Cobbetts are on the ball and looking to delay or apply to strike out you may have to expand on them.

 

Have the other two claims gone through yet?

 

I'd just sit tight for the moment and see how things unfold.

If in doubt read the

FAQs

 

If still in doubt - ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do nothing unless the court asks you to resubmit the POC or to amend it or whatever. Cobbets can ask for whatever they like from you but you dont have to provide it unless the court asks you to. Sit tight for now and see if any directive comes back from the court. Fendy xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much for replies, its made me a little less panicked! My HAlifax claim has been settled in full, I am still awaiting an answer from Barclays, although I have had a few answer-phone messages from their litigation dept, but haven't heard from them for few days now. The Barclays claim is set to be heard in the same court at the same time and date as Natwest, so they are at the same stage.

Here is what the letter from Cobbetts says :

'Pursuant to CPR Part 3.4 (2) (a), the Defendant would ask the Court to strike out the claim. The Claimant has not shown that he has reasonable grounds for bringing the claim and despite the Defendant requesting that the Claimant remedy the lack of particularity pleaded in the particulars of Claim within 14 days, the Claimant has failed to do so. The Defendant therefore respectfully requests that the claim be struck out.

In the alternative, the Defendant would request the Court to order that unless the Claimant serves fully pleaded Particulars of Claim within 14 days of service of an order of the Court, the claim be struck out . Should the Court be minded to grant such an Unless Order, the Defendant would also request permission to amend, file and serve its defence within a period of 14 days of receipt of the Claimants Particulars of Claim and for the matter to be referred back to the District Judge for further directions once the amended Defence has been filed'

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my POC, it is the same as I used for ny other two claims too.

 

 

Re-claiming unfair bank charges imposed in

the last six years. The claimant claims

interest under section 69 of the County

Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year

from date when the money became owed to me

to 3/11/06 of £ 3941.00 and also interest

at the same rate up to the date of judgment

or earlier payment at a daily rate of 8%

 

If this is insufficient does that mean I will lose this claim?

 

 

It is highly likely that Cobbetts will ask for this claim to be struck out as it has no legal basis. I suggest that you file a N244 withthe amended POC from here. This will cost you £35 which you cannot reclaim.

 

It would be wise to do this with your other 2 claims also.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks I'm doing this as we speak, I have checked my other claim and it is much clearer, Halifax have paid up so I can forget about them.

 

Please help my calculations...I'm not really as thick as I seem honest, I'm just scared to get anything wrong!!!

Plus interest pursuant to S.69 County Courts Act 1984 from date of issue to date of judgement/settlement at £xx.xx per day {(enter daily rate here - (CHARGES+OD interest)x 0.00022 = pence per day) }OR at such rate and for such periods as the court deems just.

 

my Charges total 3941.09 and interest is 1115.03

Link to post
Share on other sites

well all done and sent off, and even better news, letter arrived on saturday morning from Barclays, they have paid up in full, so it's just Nat West to go now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done with Barclays SuJ :) !!! hang in there you're doing great.

NatWest : £857.00 won! March/07

Natwest : Witholding my statements & adding defaults etc , S.A.R sent Jan/08

Natwest for my partner : £2,101.00 won! Feb/07

Studio Cards : Refund for admin charges £108 Won! Dec/07

Complaint made to FOS for P.P.I Jan/08

Nationwide: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent for statements Nov/07 ( waiting to see what happens in the OFT test case )

Littlewoods : defaulted on CCA request Feb/07

DCA's that crawled out from the woodwork and have crawled back : 28 so far!!

My favourite link on CAG:

Click here: Can't Find What You're Looking For? Here's A Complete A-z Index - The Consumer Forums

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning all,

I've just been woken up by the post man holding a recorded letter from NatWest! it reads:

'Please find enclosed a cheque for £3132.37 in accordance with the terms and conditions agreed with Cobbetts.

I would ask you to confirm to the court that the proceedings are to be discontinued....'

 

Although I feel very triumphant, the amount is well short of the asking amount with no interest or court fees included.

 

The biggest problem is that the court date is monday, HELP!

I'm not happy just to take this as we haven't actually agreed anything with Cobblers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Mumofthreeboys

How much is the full amount?

 

By sending you this cheque they are hoping to panic you into accepting as your court date is on Monday - don't let them.

 

You should ring Cobbetts and tell them you will only accept the full offer as you have said in all your letters or you will be meeting them on Monday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats what I wondered, I wasn't sure whether I should ring the number on the letter for the litigation dept or cobbetts. The full amount, before any interest is £3941.09, interest on overdraft is £1115.03 thats all before the 8% interest on top. It's quite reassuring though isn't it, they are willing to pay this much just to get out of going to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the normal post has now arrived, with a letter from Cobbetts. It sets out what they are paying back and what they are mnot, it actually makes sense so I'm going to accept this amount I think. There were a few charges on the statements which were vague and they have been explained.

'The letter does make me laugh though, ' Our Client considers that your challenge to its charges would fail in court. Our Client believes that its charges are fair, reasonable and transparent.......as such, our Client does not believe that your claim has any prospect of succeeding.'

 

It goes on for another three pages, basically saying tghat it is a 'goodwill payment' and that it is on the understanding that I do not tell any third parties about it (Oops) and that they can charge me anything in the future (shame I don't have that account anymore) and if I don't accept they will close my accoutn (again I don't have thios account anymore)

 

I half want to take them to court!

 

I want to thank all on this forum for help, I have successfully claimed against three of the big banks and I couldn't have done it without all the help. Good luck all taking them on and don't give up it's worth it in the end!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done. So long as YOU are happy with the final result. Doesnt matter what any of us would do, in my case take em to the damn court, but if you are happy, then well done, brilliant. Its a nice feeling isnt it knowing its all over. Just make sure that cheque arrives first and clears. Lol. Fendy xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...