Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Missed flights


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 296 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We visited Manchester Airport to fly off on our holiday. We arrived in plenty of time, approximately 2 and a half hours early.  So after a walk around duty free we went and had a couple of beers. We deliberately sat in front of a departure board to ensure we kept up to date with our flight. The board display read "Relax" a little later it changed to "Gates to be announced at 1.20 pm.

Eventually it read "gates open. That was the last announcement on that board, the next time we looked up it was blank. Fortunately for us o e of our party took a selfie and in the background the board was visible and it can be seen that there was no information in the right side of the board. We realised the time so rushed to the departures gate but were refused boarding as we were 2mins late. I even received a text from Ryanair to say "final call" while stood at the boarding desk. People were still stood in the tunnel and on the tarmac.

So as a result of the departures board failier we missed our flight. 

When we re visited the airport the next day, at a further cost of £400 we noticed that the board had a blue banner through it stating "can't download data" so clearly still faulty.

We logged a complaint with Manchester Airport and they have said that according to IT department there were no recorded issues.  As a result are refusing a compensation claim for the incured costs.

 

Where do we stand please ?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, BankFodder said:

Did you take a photo of the board when it displayed the error message?

Yes we did.

One photo is the selfie showing no data.

The second is of the Blue banner saying "Can't download Data.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kyosanyo

Yes the time is on the boarding pass  although we were ignorant of that fact at the time.

As.we were stood at the checking desk i actually received the "gates closing " message, I showed them as they hered  the message. I think we all know what a bunch of ignorant jobsworth arrogant people (taught by head office) the staff are. They still refused to even use common sense.

For future reference, there are NO tanoy announcements anymore. This was also our argument with Ryanair,  with no avail. Apparently they now use a "Silent call system" whatever that means. But, the fault stil lies with the airp6system.

Edited by marcaz2
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Up to this moment in time Manchester Airport are solely defending themselves by stating that they have no reports from IT regarding the faul, even though we've sent them the pictures.  The pictures even have the full digital data on such as time, date geographical data etc.

As for costs incurred.

Flights £400

Fuel £25

Food and beverages  £15

These costs do not include money waisted at the bar, 2 pints each.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...