Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for the reply do you think it’s just a threat for the 14 days or they will send court letters 
    • That’s great, thank you so much. We will contact Doves and the finance company again and hope they will resolve it. Out of interest, where would we stand if we did pay the costs? Would we then be able to claim that back or should we just wait for a response from them before we take the car back from Mercedes?     
    • As I'm off on holiday on Wednesday and won't be around I'll bring things forward and be pessimistic and decide that Iceland won't cooperate.  There are two things to ponder. The private parking companies have a lot in common for obvious reasons.  But also some differences. Excel and its sister company VCS are by far the most litigious.  They take large numbers of motorists who don't pay them to court - perhaps the majority.  That's not because they have a good case.  Indeed their case is rubbish.  It's because, sadly, enough people are terrified of the idea of going to court and just pay up when the court papers arrive.  It's a numbers game to Excel/VCS. In cases where the motorist is in it for the long haul, Caggers win 85% of the time in court against Excel/VCS (yes, I did once go back and counted all the court cases over the previous 30 months).  But Excel/VCS take the odd defeat because of the mugs who just panic and pay.  So take this into account when deciding what to do. Secondly, without boring you with the reasons, I know about the world of local journalism.  Papers have great difficulty in filling their column inches.  If you do contact the local media there is a 100% chance that they will publish something and embarrass Iceland - and maybe get them to back down. Again, have a think if this is a road you want to to go down. If you don't win by Wednesday!  
    • Followed up with letter which is no surprise as I’m easy to find via electoral roll. Letter says we have been asked to recover from you on behalf f our client in Middle East x amount. if you believe you are not liable please contact us - yeah right! If you wish to make payment here are our client bank details which look genuine and relate directly to a Dubai bank. ” if you don’t engage our client may take further action” etc blah blah blah. its the same type phrases used by CWD/IDRWW/IDR etc…..   I ignored the email, blocked the text number and will wait to see if I receive any formal action via Mail but seems like the same tactic I’ve seen for 10 years plus and I’ve ignored all. just for people’s info
    • Hi. I expect the experts will be along later to advise you. In the meantime, I've amended your thread title to show the car park name and location. HB
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Charges refunded into frozen account - HELP please!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6361 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

An avid follower of the site but a newcomer to posting (never done this in my life so apologies if this is not the right place to post this!). However, hopefully someone will be able to help me in the way many, many others have been helped already.

 

RBS have refunded charges (ok, I admit I accepted an offer - it was an excellent offer, but not the full amount claimed!) - but into a frozen bank account!

 

Long story, but they froze the account (even though it had been managed without any problems for some years) due to arrears on a loan therefore any monies paid into this account they take towards clearing the loan itself. I know they can do this if there IS money in the account (right of first appropriation I think it's called?) - but I'm so hacked off that they refunded these charges into the account (which was in credit at the time) in the first place despite knowing it was frozen! They've effectively not refunded the money by knowingly doing this! I know it's reducing my overall debt (so in a way it's still positive) but the customer services people who agreed the refund said they "had" to do it this way rather than send a cheque and have refused to let me access it.

 

Can they actually do this?? I did complain but they've refused to let me access it (another long story as I've been totally misquoted from a telephone conversation) and have since got really heavy on the payment arrangement, now saying I'm not complying with the agreement on the loan (which I am....).

 

Can anyone help?!

 

Cheers

 

(Moral here for me - have sumbitted a claim for a second account. Will take it all the way on this one!!!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Scottie.

 

I think that you're stuffed.

If you had insisted the the GOGW had been paid to you as a cheque then they would then have had the choice of paying you off or you continueing your action.

But at this stage of the game, I think that it is too late to do anything about it.

 

Take comfort from the fact that the repayment has reduced your overall debt.

 

The problem is that if you have had a loan, then the bank has advanced you the money and they are entitled to have that loan repaid.

 

another long story as I've been totally misquoted from a telephone conversation

This is why we advise that all communications with the bank are conducted by letter, keeping copies of every letter and every reply. You then have a permanent record of exactly what each party has said.

 

Regards, Rooster.

  • Haha 1

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rooster....

 

.....I'm now complaining about how they handled the complaint (in writing!!!) but like you say I think all I can say is that this will reduce my overall debt. I did ask for a cheque but the customer services guy said that because they are dealing with SO many claims, they have changed their policy and that RBS will ONLY pay in to accounts, regardless of whether they are frozen, overdrawn, with debt collectors or whatever. They will now only give cheques to people with closed accounts. Interesting to see if this has been said to anyone else?

 

BTW - they froze the account AFTER I started the process. I read on a thread somewhere they can't do this - is this correct do you know?

 

Thanks for posting a reply - and so quickly - much appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you have internet banking is so PM me.

 

Scottie, I would strongly recommend against pm'ing anyone about your bank account. After all, you do not know who you're talking to.

 

This is an open forum, so that we can all grow and learn from sharing information. Either the info is helpful to all and totally legal, and we could all benefit from any way to defeat the banks, or it is not, and we should all stay away from it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers all - and I agree that the point of the forum is for everyone to learn from each other.....

 

In answer to the question - I claimed for 6 years and refused the first three offers. Just before the 14 days was up before filing, they offered me 90% - got cold feet and accepted. I took a chance in the first place because I claimed a bit more than the Scottish courts consider as small claims (live in England but branch is in Scotland) so I thought it safer in the long run.

 

Does that make a difference?!

 

Thanks all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scottie I don’t want to know anything about your bank details. It just I had the same problem with am bank, which I don’t want to go into on here. I think I my be able to help, but that is up to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Alison82

If i were you I would now ask for the rest of the refund to be payied by cheque (it's still your money no reseon you can't still claim it just because you accepted some of it)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scottie I don’t want to know anything about your bank details. It just I had the same problem with am bank, which I don’t want to go into on here. I think I my be able to help, but that is up to you.

 

Scottie, I would strongly recommend against pm'ing anyone about your bank account. After all, you do not know who you're talking to.

 

This is an open forum, so that we can all grow and learn from sharing information. Either the info is helpful to all and totally legal, and we could all benefit from any way to defeat the banks, or it is not, and we should all stay away from it.

 

I am fully in agreement with Bookworm's comment.

 

Regards, Rooster.

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under the letter you were sent it would have been paid into the account you were claiming from as it had not gone to MCOL stage where the usual norm is a cheque being sent out, so yep they can and yep they did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Thanks all for your comments - good to know the support is out there!

 

My request re: appropriation was refuted on the basis that in their final response they stated they reserved their right to offset and weren't budging i.e. if I want to take it further I need to go to the OFT......... Thanks RBS.

 

However, they have until Friday to respond to my second letter on my second account before I file.......... Won't let them get away with it a second time...

 

Cheers all

 

Scottie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...