Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Friends LC Asset/Link Claimform - 2019 Barclaycard debt


spergen
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 386 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good afternoon all

 

After my successful dealings with Barclaycard thanks to you all I am now helping a friend of mine to hopefully do the same.  Single mum with no computer etc so sorting all the paperwork and explaining as we go along. 

 

Old Barclaycard debt apparently sold to Avarto then Moorcroft - no letters of assignment but both blood suckers chased the debt claiming they owned it. 

 

Dec 21 received a letter of assignment from Barclaycard stating sold to LC Assets - No letters from LC

 

May 22 received a letter of assignment from LC Assets stating sold to Link - No further letters

 

Sept 22 received Court papers from NCC with the claimant being LC Assets 

 

Now she has only ever had a notice of default from Barclaycard with nothing other than stated from the others.  I have created a MCOL account with her and notified that we intend to defend all of the claim. 

 

Now just about to send off a CCA request to LC Asset ( Does it matter the address on the claim form is in Luxembourg? ) 

 

Now was going to send a CPR31  off to Kearns Solicitors but noticed my debt was under 10k but hers is as follows:-

Amount claimed - £9500

Court fees - £455

Legal costs - £100

 

Therefore the total amount is over the 10k mark for the small claims track, therefore what form should i send to the solicitors?  

 

Thank you in advance for any help you provide

 

Ok sorry guys I have found the original form in the Library, so i just delete this section then? 

 

 

Although your claim is for a sum which is not more than £10,000.00 and will in all likelihood be allocated to the small claims track for determination upon my delivering a defence, at this moment in time I have not delivered my defence and the case has not been allocated to a track.

 

In consequence the provisions of CPR 27(2) are of no effect and you should not seek to avoid compliance with your CPR 31 duties by claiming otherwise]#

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Friends LC Asset/Link Claimform - old Barclaycard debt

Which Court have you received the claim from ? MCOL Northampton N1

 

Name of the Claimant ? LC ASSET 2 S.A.R.L 

 

Date of issue – 25 Aug 2022

 

1.The Claimant C claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced (16 digit code)  and opened effective from 07-03-2019. The agreement is regulated by the CCA 1974 

CCA was signed by the defendant D and from which credit was extended to D. 

 

2.D failed to comply with a default notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by 30-01-2020 a default was recorded.

 

3.As at 29-11-2021 the defendant owed Barclaycard plc the sum of 9050.00. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective 29-11-21 and made regular upon C serving a notice of assignment upon D shortly thereafter. 

 

And C claims 1

, 9050.00   

2, Interest pursuant to section 69 County Court Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from 29-11-21 to 25-08-2022 of 470.00  And thereafter at a daily rate of 1.91 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date 25-08-2022

 

 

What is the total value of the claim? 10,055
 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No
 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card
 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After
 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? No
 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Will find out & edit
 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser
 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Sort of - see first post
 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No
 

Why did you cease payments? Could not afford them
 

What was the date of your last payment? Never made a payment
 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No
 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No - buried head in the sand

 

 

This might be easier 

 

 

 

N1 form (1).pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

need to file the defence before the 27th September 

 

I have written out a rough draft for advice and polishing 

 

 

Defence 

 

  1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 

 

 2. It is noted insofar as I have in the past held a contractual relationship with Barclaycard. I do not recall the precise details or aware of any outstanding balance. I therefore have sought clarification from the claimant by way of a CPR 31.14. Unfortunately the claimant has failed to comply with my request. 

 

 3. It is noted that the debt was legally assigned by LC ASSET (Ex Barclaycard) to the claimant and notice has been served.  The Letter of Assignment was received on the 21st December 2021, then another letter of assignment from LC ASSET to LINK financial was received on 22nd May 2022 but since that date have not received anything requesting or related to the alleged debt until the Letter of Claim dated 25th August 2022

 

 4. It is noted the claimant states that the defendant has failed to make contractual payments under the terms of the agreement. The claimant has failed to comply to my section 78 request and thus remains in default of said request and therefore unable to enforce any alleged agreement? 

 

 5. It is noted the claimant states a default notice has been served upon the defendant pursuant to S.87 (1) CCA. I have never received any Default Notice relating to the alleged claim therefore it is denied.

 

 6. On the 06th September 2022 I made a legal request by way of a section 78 request to the Claimant. The Claimant has failed to comply with my request and is therefore in default and unable to enforce or request any relief until such time they comply. 

 

  Therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: 

(a) Show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and 

(b) Show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and 

(c) Show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a Default Notice Pursuant of sec 87(1) of the CCA1974. 

(d) Show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim. 

 

 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed and evidence any breach and notice of breach by way of a default notice or notice of sums in arrears 

 

8. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, 

 

no3, is it not woth keeping it in as she recieved a notice of transfer from LC Asset to LINK financial but the N1 is from LC asset? 

 

Yes the CPR did go off to Kearns, should i replace claimant with Kearns solicitors? 

 

 

Edited by spergen
Link to post
Share on other sites

Defence 

 

  1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 

 

 2. It is noted insofar as I have in the past held a contractual relationship with Barclaycard. I do not recall the precise details or aware of any outstanding balance. I therefore have sought clarification from the claimant’s solicitors by way of a CPR 31.14. Unfortunately the claimant’s solicitor has failed to comply with my request. 

 

  3. It is noted the claimant states that the defendant has failed to make contractual payments under the terms of the agreement. The claimant has failed to comply to my section 78 request and thus remains in default of said request and therefore unable to enforce any alleged agreement? 

 

 4. It is noted the claimant states a default notice has been served upon the defendant pursuant to S.87 (1) CCA. I have never received any Default Notice relating to the alleged claim therefore it is denied.

 

 5. On the 06th September 2022 I made a legal request by way of a section 78 request to the Claimant. The Claimant has failed to comply with my request and is therefore in default and unable to enforce or request any relief until such time they comply. 

 

  Therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: 

(a) Show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and 

(b) Show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and 

(c) Show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a Default Notice Pursuant of sec 87(1) of the CCA1974. 

(d) Show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim. 

 

 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed and evidence any breach and notice of breach by way of a default notice or notice of sums in arrears 

 

8. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Update

 

Went to go see my friend tonight, she received a letter from the courts stating they had sent her defence to the Clamant and the claimants solicitor giving them 28days to provide us with the information required and to further inform the court if they wished to proceed. 

 

This letter was dated the 26th of September, checked MCOL and nothing showing and nothing in the post to date. 

 

Should I get her to phone the court for an update or ask for a letter confirming the situation seeing as its in limbo at the moment? 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

So a quick update 

 

My friend called me in quite a panic the other day, Link Financial sent her a letter stating they had recieved the documents relating to the S77/88 request from the original creditor and that the account is now enforceable!  

 

Went over for a cuppa and to look thorough the paperwork as it was quite vast, upon reading though it turns out they had simply gone to the barcleycard website and printed off the sandard terms and conditions.  The fools had left HTML link at the bottom of the page, how stupid do they think we are? 

 

So thats it in a nutshell for the moment.  I hope this helps anyone in a similar situation? 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • dx100uk changed the title to Friends LC Asset/Link Claimform - 2019 Barclaycard debt
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...