Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
    • V important you read lots of BMW threads too !  
    • So should I send them a new SAR and put my date of birth on it? Or do I need to send them some proof? Driving license? 
    • Thanks so much for your help!! I've emailed them, and when they reply saying they can't do it I'll reply and state my rights. I'm so glad I found this forum, and will read all of the posts I can find and help guides available for the future. Really can't thank you enough.
    • utter BS, doesn't matter you signed it. pers i'd be writing as per the other threads here rejecting the car as not as described under CRA etc and be done with it. as its a debit card you could also do a full chargeback within 120 days to your bank and simply dump the car back to BMW. 100's of like threads to read here. get your ducks inline. make sure you know what you are doing and off you go. dont take any BS from BMW, no matter what you sign it does NOT remove your consumer rights. p'haps it might be on the off chance you are a good manager , a quick phonecall tomorrow saying you dont want it because (no bla bla fitted) it might be resolved in 5 mins..i will guess to date you not tried
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Court Claim Against EVRi - Damaged and unusable. **SETTLED BEFORE HEARING**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 568 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

After reading the many invaluable accounts on CAG, I think I have case to bring against Hermes and would like some advice on this please.

 

I sold two light fittings to the same buyer on eBay and paid for postage (both lights together) using Hermes via Packlink. The value of both lights was £250 and I also paid for enhanced compensation. I bought proper packaging material and a suitably sized box from a packaging retailer. I packaged the items extremely well and took photos of the packaged items.

 

Annoyingly, several weeks later the buyer reported the lights as damaged and requested a full refund via eBay (they were just within the refund window). I opened a claim with Packlink uploading necessary photos of the packaging and lights before and after the damage. Packlink completed their initial investigation stating that;

 

Quote

“After completing the investigation with the carrier the shipment has been confirmed as damaged. I am writing to let you know that the dossier has been transferred to the Claims department for the final evaluation.”

 

However, their claims department incorrectly asserted that I had used Packing Paper and rejected the claim due to insufficient packaging. I have tried to get them to reconsider based upon their incorrect identification of the packaging material – it was Shredded Cardboard much thicker than Packing Paper. But so far they have not come back to me.

 

I’ve tried to contact Hermes but can’t get beyond their automated bot with my reference number, as it just tells me to take it up with Packlink.

 

Do you feel I have a case to start a Money Claim against Hermes based upon the following points;

 

  1. The damage inflicted upon the lights (they were very badly bent and misshaped), suggests that they were subjected to manhandling far in excess of that you would expect in transit.
  2. And given the fact that Packlink stated that “the carrier has confirmed that the shipment was damaged”.

 

Any advice much appreciated. If I do start a claim, I’ll update this post with all the details.

 

Thanks
🙂

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, I've got photos of the damaged lights and all the packaging. Can upload photos here if that would be helpful?

 

Haven't started formal proceedings yet, just wanted some advice on the strength of my case. Will kick things off this week if you think I have a case?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

 

I've been doing my reading around on this forum and have issued Hermes with a Letter of Claim

 

They have responded by directing me to Packlink and denying that Hermes is responsible.

 

My letter of Claim gave Hermes 14 days before I commence legal proceedings. I've drafted the Claim Details and chronology which I'll post below. If someone can offer any feedback, it would be much appreciated.

 

Thanks

 

Hi
Sorry for not responding sooner. I’ve only just had to reimburse the eBay buyer for the items they purchased which were damaged and crushed during the Hermes delivery.


I’ve been reading around the different Hermes/Packlink topics on the forum as well as reading the official government guidance and I think this is the course of action I have to take;


1. Send formal Letter of Claim to Hermes (uploaded below) informing them of the damage to my shipment, my financial loss and giving them 14 days to reimburse me before I take action in the County Court.


2. Start the Money Claim online. I’m a bit confused which of the two system I should use – can you advise?
 

WWW.MONEYCLAIM.GOV.UK
WWW.GOV.UK

How to take legal action if someone owes you money (small claims court), how much it costs, what happens next. Includes information...


3. As part of completing the online claim I will submit a Particulars of Claim detailing the facts of the case and timeline of events (uploaded below).


4. Hermes will probably send a standard letter disputing my claim at which point I will be sent an additional questionnaire by the Court and asked to pay extra court fees. I should both fill out the questionnaire and pay the fees as well as agreeing to mediation if applicable.


5. Should it go to mediation then I’ll follow the advice offered within this forum.
Any pointers and advice much appreciated. I’ll be posting the Letter of Claim to Hermes in the next day or two pending any feedback.

 

 

 

Quote

Claim Details with Chronology

 

 

 

The claimant used the defendants courier service to deliver a parcel containing two Laura Ashley ceiling lights value £250 to an address in Surrey. The claimant took out insurance against damage or loss caused by the defendant's own breach of contract or negligence. When the parcel arrived at the destination the contents were so badly crushed and damaged that the recipient requested a refund. This was caused by the defendant’s own breach of contract or negligence. The claimant brings this action under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. Claimant seeks the value of the lights £250 plus delivery and insurance costs £9.99 under the County Courts act 1984

 

The following is a detailed chronology of the events surrounding this claim.

 

26/09/2021

The claimant sold two Laura Ashley ceiling lights in excellent condition on eBay. The buyer paid £250 for the lights plus £9.99 postage.

 

27/09/2021

The claimant purchased suitable heavy-duty cardboard box and shock absorbent packaging material from a specialist parcel and packing retailer.

The claimant packaged up the items with considerable care and attention. The packaging consisted of a sturdy new cardboard box securely sealed and marked as fragile. The majority of the packaging used was good quality shock absorbent shredded cardboard. In addition, foam, polystyrene filler and bubble wrap was also used to fill any voids and provide additional strength and shock absorbance. In all, the packaging was more than sufficient to withstand the normal bumps and vibration expected during transit. It more than conformed to the packaging guidance on Hermes own website that states, “Your parcel needs to be wrapped well enough to stay intact should it fall off a conveyor belt (which can be up to 1.2m high).” -  https://www.myhermes.co.uk/help-and-support/how-to-wrap-a-parcel

 

See uploaded photo evidence illustrating;

 - The light fittings in excellent condition prior to postage.

 - The comprehensive packaging of the items using the suitable packaging materials mentioned above.

 

 

 

28/09/2021

The claimant purchased a Hermes delivery Label and paid for additional insurance for the protection against loss or damage for the shipment.

The Hermes Tracking ID is H0067A0030190134.

 

See uploaded photo evidence illustrating;

 - The purchased Hermes postage label with additional insurance cover

 

29/09/2021

Shipment started its short journey from Brighton, East Sussex to Surrey.

 

 

27/10/2021

After receiving the shipment from Hermes, the buyer of the lights initiates an eBay returns request citing that the lights where so badly damaged that they are unusable. The buyer requests a full refund including postage costs.

 

See uploaded photo evidence illustrating;

 - The badly crushed and damaged metal light fittings upon delivery by Hermes

 

 

28/10/2021

After being unable to discuss the matter with Hermes customer service instead the claimant open a damage claim with Packlink whom the Hermes postage label was purchased from.

 

01/11/2021

Packlink update the damage claim stating "After completing the investigation with the carrier the shipment has been confirmed as damaged"

 

See uploaded photo evidence illustrating;

 - Packlink statement that their investigation with the carrier confirmed the shipment was damaged.

 

03/11/2021

Packlink incorrectly assert that packing paper was used for the shipment and dismissed the claim. The claimant immediately responded pointing out that no packing paper had been used and that the materials used were good quality shock absorbent shredded cardboard, foam, polystyrene filler and bubble wrap sealed in a new sturdy box. However, Packlink ignored these responses and offered no means for appeal.

 

23/11/2021

eBay completes the returns process by refunding the £250 plus £9.99 postage to the buyer having deducts the funds from my bank account.

 

See uploaded evidence illustrating;

 - The Claimants eBay Financial Statement for November 2021 showing total claims of £259.99 for the refund of the two lights.

 

29/11/2021

As Packlink are not based in the UK and are not under the jurisdiction of English County Courts, the claimants only hope of getting compensation for the financial loss incurred due to a breach of duty and care of services (under the Consumer Rights Act 2015), is to issue Hermes with a Letter of Claim with the threat to start legal action in 14 days if not financially reimbursed.

The claimant is being this action as a beneficial third-party under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999

 

 

03/12/2021

 

Hermes acknowledges the claimant’s letter and provide details of the claim case number and how to respond.

 

07/12/2021

 

The claimant responds to Hermes reiterating the circumstances and that unless they work to resolve the matter the claimant will have no choice to claim against Hermes under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 in the County Courts.

 

08/12/2021

 

Unfortunately, Hermes responds by stating that they are unable to assist further with the matter and they update the status of this internal claim as solved.

 

See uploaded evidence illustrating;

-          Hermes complaint communications between the claimant and Hermes.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent, thanks for you speedy response.

 

One question I have regarding starting the Money Claim. Do I use the Money Claim Online website or the new online claim service at Gov.uk? It seems like the newer service offers a better experience for filing the details of claim. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi

 

Apologies for not updating this thread recently, my claim is still ongoing although nothing much has happened yet. 

 

After receiving the expected defendants response from EVRi disputing the claim, they had agreed to mediation. After waiting to hear a date for mediation, EVRi must have then decided against it as I received notification that - "Mediation did not resolve the claim" and the claim will go to a hearing.

 

I was sent a Judgement Order requesting me to submit my witness statement to the court and 'the other side', including any other witness statements and accompanying documents.

 

I don't want to deviate from the evidence I've already submitted so I was going to just send the court and EVRi a copy of my claim form as my witness statement. I will also include photos and other evidence along with a witness statement from my partner. Does this all sound ok?

 

Many thanks for your continued support and advice   

Link to post
Share on other sites

Witness Statement.pdf

 

See my uploaded redacted witness statement. This is a version of my submitted claim form formatted based upon the following criteria specified in the Judgement Order;

 

 

Quote

 

A witness statement must

  •   have the court case number at the top

  •   start with the witness’ name and address

  •   it must contain numbered paragraphs and should be typed and

    double spaced. If not typed, it must be written clearly in block

    capitals or printed.

  •   finish with the words “I believe the facts set out above to be true.

    I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth”, the date of the statement and the person’s signature.

 

  •  

 

Sorry I need to spend a bit of time redacting the defence. I'll do it for tomorrow evening.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, BankFodder said:

Yes, we definitely need to see the defence.

 

I'm afraid that you're witness statement needs a lot of work and also it could probably be shorter. I would normally suggest not more than two sides .

You haven't told us the date for submission and you haven't told us if you have received their bundle

 

 

 

Attached is a redacted copy of EVRi defence.

 

I'm happy to edit my witness statement (previously uploaded) if you feel it should be shorter? In addition to my witness statement I was also going to include a witness statement from my partner corroborating my account.

 

 

EVRi Submitted Defence.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry my mistake, material needs to be sent before 4pm 26th April.

The instructions say that the material needs to be sent to the court using the address given. So I'll post two sets of material to the court and EVRi
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 23/24th sounds a bit too late to post the material to the court and EVRi. I'd like to get them sent ideally by the 20th.

 

My original claims form contains a detailed chronology of the case, so I was thinking of just sending this along with a detailed appendix of all my supporting evidence i.e. photos, screenshots and correspondences. I'm not sure there's much else I can include apart from a witness statement from my partner?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, lets go for the Friday the 22nd. I'm just not confident that next day delivery on the Monday would get it to both parties before 4pm on the Tuesday.

 

Thanks for your continued support

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I was just checking the Post Offices guaranteed next day delivery service. Seems it's possible.

 

I'm happy to wait until the Monday before sending if you're able to help with the rewrite? It would be good to make a start sooner, so I feel confidence about completing it by the Monday.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I'm happy to wait until the Monday before sending if you're able to help with the rewrite? It would be good to make a start sooner, so I feel confidence about completing it by the Monday.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Final update having recently agreed a settlement with EVRi (Ervi).

 

It's been nearly six months since I last posted an update regarding my claim against EVRi. The reason being that for most of that nothing happened. I didn't hear from the court for ages after submitting the witness statement that BankFodder kindly helped me with.

 

Having read that the County Courts had up to a twelve month backlog, I'd resigned myself to the fact that I might not hear anything until 2023. But a few weeks back I received a letter from the court confirming a date for the hearing and giving me a deadline for paying the court fees.

 

I contacted EVRi to ask if they were interested in trying to settle prior to it getting to court, whilst making it clear that I was very much prepared to go to court if needs be. I heard nothing back initially but was then contacted by a solicitors acting on behalf of EVRi.

 

Within a few days I had had a call with the Solicitors and a settlement had been agreed based upon my original claim - it was honoured in full. Once I received the funds, I then informed the court to cancel the claim.

 

So after nearly a year and a not-insignificant amount of effort, closure has been achieved for the items damaged in transit with EVRi. It's a shame that their own complaints procedure and that of Packlink's are so woefully inadequate that if forces customers to seek compensation via alternative legal routes.  


I have just made a donation to Consumer Action Group as a thanks for all the help and support offered, especially by BankFodder. Keep up the good work guys as the service you provide is invaluable and I would encourage others to show there appreciated through donations😃


 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Court Claim Against EVRi - Damaged and unusable. **SETTLED BEFORE HEARING**

The settlement was for the full amount I had specified in the original Money Claim. This was just under £300, which was the full costs I incurred due to the damaged items and their postage.

 

During the earlier period of my claim, it was EVRi internal Solicitors who responded to the claim denying responsibility. However, it was an independent Solicitors firm who contacted me when I reached out to EVRi asking if they would consider trying to resolve prior to me paying the court fees. This second set of Solicitors were actually very courteous and professional and negotiated the settlement quickly and efficiently.

 

Hope that helps.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...