Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Hermes package tampered with, item stolen


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 920 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Here's a brief summary of the situation as it stands at the moment

 

Ipod Classic 120Gb - sold on ebay for £60 including postage with standard cover (up to £25)

 

15/05 - item dropped off at parcelshop, in box with packaging, inside a delivery bag

19/05 item arrived at recipients house and ipod was missing from inside, leaving just an empty box with packaging in the delivery bag

20/05 - claim sent to packlink

21/05 - claim sent to hermes

 

I will update this page, in a couple of weeks, or as soon as a decision has been made about the claims

Edited by FMJ36
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Packlink have come back :

 

22/05 - Packlink email stating that they are carrying out a formal investigation for tampering/theft

24/05 - Packlink dismiss the claim with no compensation (photo below)

 

Hermes haven't got back yet but it seems they will just refer me back to Packlink so it goes around in circles. I will prepare a letter before action, to post to both Packlink UK and Hermes UK, and post a draft of it here before sending it off

 

Packlink.pdf

Edited by FMJ36
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a draft of my letter before action:

 

Quote

Dear...,

 

I would like to bring to your attention the tampering of a parcel, and subsequent theft of an Ipod Classic 120Gb, while in transit through the Hermes network. This has cost me the full sale value of the item of £56 plus postage costs of £3.84. Under the Consumers Rights Act 2015, I am claiming compensation for £59.84. Given that Hermes are beneficiaries of the contract with Packlink, the Contracts (Right of Third Parties) Act 1999 gives me the right to claim this compensation directly from Hermes. If my claim is not approved, within 14 days of receipt of this letter, I will be opening a small claims case through the County Courts.
 
Yours sincerely,

 

Please let me know if theres anything missing, thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I have no great need for the money, although it is enough for me to go to the effort to try and get it back rather than letting them get away with this. After a quick google search its clear to see that this is happening regularly and if enough people stand up for themselves it might effect some change in the way do business. Their employees obviously aren't satisfied if they sink to stealing from customers, and for the owners to brush this under the carpet is tantamount to them stealing these things for themselves.

 

I have this letter of claim ready to go, but will follow your advice and wait until 10 days before the mediation of the other item to send it off. Will update again when i hear back on the other one. Like you say would be great to have them both handled in one mediation but will have to see how things play out. Thanks again

Edited by FMJ36
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

They sent a lost parcel claim form through which i submitted and they replied within a week saying the item had been lost in the network and to contact packlink for compensation. Packlink had already refused to compensate. I then sent the letter before claim to Hermes, 14 days before filing the claim. Now just waiting on a date for mediation

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Here is the recent correspondence I have received regarding this parcel

 

Quote

Dear ...,

 

Further to my email this morning, our customer services team have investigated your parcel H0067A0004037570.

 

As this parcel was sent via Packlink it is Packlink who are liable to remedy the issue, not Hermes. We are liaising with Packlink and have informed them of your position. They will be in touch to discuss the claims process with you in due course. Just to make you aware, our contact at Packlink is on annual leave until the 27th September so you may not receive contact immediately.

 

 

Kind regards,

Chloe Higgs

 

My letter before claim was posted on 10/09 and the claim is to be posted on 24/09. To say that i will extend this date  to allow Packlink time to look over my claim seems a bit redundant at this point, considering they have already dismissed it. And the idea that there is only one Packlink contact at Hermes also seems dubious. So I think I will just have to file the claim anyway on the date it was supposed to be filed in order to avoid weakening my position and going around in circles with them again. What are your views on this? Should I wait for a response from Packlink or go ahead and file the claim on the date stated in the letter? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

This claim has now been settled. I heard from a Hermes legal assistant shortly after filing it, here is the final correspondence. Thank you again for all your help with these.

 

Quote

Dear ...,

 

Thank you for your email. I note that you have rejected our offer of £59.84.

 

As a gesture of goodwill Hermes is willing to increase its offer to £94.84 in full and final settlement of this matter. This email is sent on a without prejudice basis.

 

If you would like to accept this offer please provide me with your bank details and I will process the payment which will be with you by 29th October.

 

Kind regards,

Chloe Higgs

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...