Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Missed first Capital One payment of many


erikborgo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1309 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I rang Aqua again asking for a recording of the phone call I had with the manager who said that Aqua couldn't help.  The advisor who answered this latest call told me that they had to open a complaint procedure in order to send me a recording. 

 

I pointed that under GDPR laws, no such complaint procedure had to be opened for them to send me the recording I had requested.  Subject Access Request?  I need that recording (mine wasn't a clear) for my Financial Ombudsman complaint.

 

Can Aqua take the account back from Wescott, if they wanted to?  I suspect that they could.

 

I'm about to call Capital, maybe I can stop them going down the debt collection company route. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hasnt gone anywhere

Wetclothes dont buy debts

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a feeling that Wescott were merely retained by Aqua and acting on their instructions. 

 

So Aqua could take the account back and accept a nominal offer?  Or am I doomed to deal with Wescott?  Is it worth sending Aqua a letter and income/expenditure sheet offering a small monthly amount?  They might write back saying that I should talk to Wescott.

 

Also, now that it's gone to Wescott, have I lost any tenuous chance I had to get this debt written off?  I've paid them far more than the original debt amount, over 8 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hasnt gone anywhere

wetcloths do not buy debts......

 

what part of the above do you not understand

 

Dx

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you saying that my account is still with Aqua and I can deal with them and ignore Wescott? 

I don't want this to go to court, which is what I expect will happen if I ignore Wescott, who haven't contacted me yet.

 

I'll try and catch the post office before it shuts today, with a registered post letter of nominal offer to Aqua.

 

Thank you for your reply.  It's good to know I haven't been sold.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why do we keep going around in the same circle since post 1 ??

do you not re read your thread to see if you've already asked the same questions and already got the answer?

 

wetcloths don't buy debs...

look on their letters it says OUR CLIENT...oh guess who Aqua and the old one said Capital one 

 

original creditors don't do court

and

only the OWNER of a debt can try and issue court proceedings.

and even then

they have NO MORE POWERS than you or i

they are not superman.

 

pro rata letters 1 & 2 as advised earlier

if they refuse to accept them simply pay them £1PCM till you die.

take control no BE controlled

it's YOUR MONEY

to distribute where you choose IF you choose on NON priority debts.

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...