Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
    • V important you read lots of BMW threads too !  
    • So should I send them a new SAR and put my date of birth on it? Or do I need to send them some proof? Driving license? 
    • Thanks so much for your help!! I've emailed them, and when they reply saying they can't do it I'll reply and state my rights. I'm so glad I found this forum, and will read all of the posts I can find and help guides available for the future. Really can't thank you enough.
    • utter BS, doesn't matter you signed it. pers i'd be writing as per the other threads here rejecting the car as not as described under CRA etc and be done with it. as its a debit card you could also do a full chargeback within 120 days to your bank and simply dump the car back to BMW. 100's of like threads to read here. get your ducks inline. make sure you know what you are doing and off you go. dont take any BS from BMW, no matter what you sign it does NOT remove your consumer rights. p'haps it might be on the off chance you are a good manager , a quick phonecall tomorrow saying you dont want it because (no bla bla fitted) it might be resolved in 5 mins..i will guess to date you not tried
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Harlands/exercise4less/crs


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1565 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

so similar position to what everyone else is in, I’ve been with e4l for a few years and probably not used it in 2. When browsing my direct debits I realised I was still paying for this so just cancelled the dd on the spot.

 

within a few weeks I got an email from them saying you owe x. I replied saying by cancelling the dd I terminate my contract. Leave it again for a few more weeks and now I have crs contacting me. They’re trying to get close to £200 out of me.

 

I've emailed crs saying I’ve cancelled my membership but they’ve not replied. They’ve now sent a text asking me to call them. 

 

Ive seen the recommendation to send a letter which I will do today but is there anything I should worry about in my case and should I ring crs? Any advice will be greatly appreciated.

 

i intend to buy a house this year so really do not want my credit rating being affected.

 

thanks in advance!

 

Callum 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

Just had a return letter from them:

 

Further to your recent correspondence, we wish to advise that cancelling your direct debit was not adequate notice of your intention to cancel. The terms of your agreement specifically statethat you must give notice in via the club’s website and complete minimum number of direct debit payments you committed to.

 

We are unable to accept your offer of £19 as sufficient to settle this debt because more than one month has passed without payment and without completing the correct cancellation procedure.

 

As you did not complete correct cancellation procedure, the club were bound by the contract to hold your membership open for you. A service has been provided during this time, at the cost to the club, whether you attended or not.

 

As your payments were not honoured and you failed to rectify your breach of agreement charges were applied to your account and your file referred to ourselves for collection at which point you became responsible for our collection fees.

 

To be clear, the addition of charges in such circumstances is stipulated in the terms of your agreement.

It is our position that our charges are lawful and in line with all relevant guidance and thus are not unlawful.

These charges have been added to cover actual and necessary costs incurred because of your breach of contract and thus are not penalties.

 

We may be able to negotiate a reduction on these charges, but will not accept any offer of payment that gives no consideration to the costs these charges cover.

 

For the above reasons it must remain our position that the balance of x is correct and due.

 

What should I do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Good morning all, just had another letter from crs threatening 1) legal action. 2) outsource to external agents. 

 

Funny how the legal action is half is half a page of text and outsource is a one liner. Intimidation tactics at its finest.

 

I take it they'll take the external agents course of action?

 

Ill continue to ignore them.

 

thanks.

 

callum 

 

 

Edited by Callumwith2ls
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...