Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Critical Illness - Legal and General


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5029 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I didn't want to get drawn into this one (this being my first day and all) but feel I need to add a few factors into this one.

 

Firstly, let me declare that I am a financial adviser; ex IFA and now an independent mortgage broker.

 

Please dont tar us all with the same brush, we are not all commission hungry fat cats with no scruples.

 

FWIW, I've been in this industry for 15 years now and have helped numerous clients successfully receive their critical illness payouts from various life companies.

 

Critical illness plans have been getting some real bad press this year; in particular The mail on Sunday finance section has featured a number of such cases where the life company refuses to pay out on the basis of "non disclosure". There are some valueable lessons for us all here:

 

1. When applying for this type of cover, disclose ALL illnesses you have ever had.

 

2. Always read the small print of the declaration you sign at the end of the application form, it specifically mentions failure to disclose previous illnesses (known as "non disclosure")

 

3. If by reading this thread you are now in doubt about your own critical illness policy (assuming of course that you have one, as the majority of people dont) then review it ASAP. If you are unsure then either talk to your insurance broker or the life company direct

 

4. There is pressure on life companies to underwrite these policies very quickly now (if mortgage related or the application is submitted via the internet for example) and therefore, in very many cases, the life companies no longer contact your GP at the point of sale. This therefore means that they only check your medical records if you make a claim and therefore if you have omitted a previous illness in your application, it will come to light when they check your medical records; so declare ALL previous ailments, no matter how small or immaterial you may feel they are.

 

5. It is a good idea for everyone to review their policies every few years. In the case of critical illness policies, premiums have actually been decreasing as actuaries have more data now on aids. Also, some of the newer life companies coming into the market offer more comprehensive policies which cover far more critical illnesses than some of the earlier plans. One word of warning though, check to see if your monthly premium is guaranteed or reviewable. If you have a guaranteed premium now, make sure the new quote you receive is "like for like". In other words, make sure it is also a guaranteed premium also and not reviewable.

 

6. For matters such as these it is always best to seek unbiased, independent advice.

 

My heart genuinely goes out to the original poster on this one. I survived cancer myself, so I have a better idea than most of what you are going through and this L & G aggro is the last thing you need.

 

Feel free to pm me and I will gladly assist you in any way I can

Donate to your favourite charities without it costing you a penny. For more details please visit www.insure4charity.co.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

The original poster needs to see a solicitor ASAP. In view of the illness any court action can be brought forward by application to the court

 

I'm sorry but I have to disagree.

 

The proper process to take on this one is:

 

1. Complain in writing to L & G

 

2. Ensure you ask in the letter if they contacted your GP at the point of sale for your medical records (this is known as a PMAR)

 

It is unclear from your posting exactly how far down this road you are. If you get no joy from L & G then it is probably best to refer the matter to the Ombudsman. If the Ombudsman feels that the selling agent should be made accountable for this, he may well refer it back to that company/individual. However, this raises some other issues:

 

1. Term assurance has only been regulated by the FSA for a couple of years now, so, depending upon when you were sold the policy, the individual may not have been regulated by the FSA (you didn't say where you bought the policy from, bank, insurance company salesman, IFA, supermarket, etc)

 

2. If it comes down to "your word against the adviser" then remember that you will have signed an application form giving the life company authority to contact your GP for access to your medical records and you also signed to confirm that you had told the truth about your medical history and had not omitted any relevent illnesses.

 

Personally, I think you would be throwing good money after bad getting a solicitor involved until you had completely exhausted the above system, which is completely free of charge to you.

 

Forgive my directness on this, but I do not know all the details of your medical condition. If your illness is terminal and your policy covers you for death or critical illness (most of these policies do), it is likely that there will be an option for L & G to advance you the life insurance, before you die, on the proviso that your doctor confirms in writing that your condition is terminal.

  • Haha 1

Donate to your favourite charities without it costing you a penny. For more details please visit www.insure4charity.co.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

JonChris,

 

I think you and I are going to have to agree to disagree on this one.

 

For a start, the original poster has not divulged enough information to allow anyone to give him specific advice.

 

I'm also not anti solicitors; I have both friends and clients who are solicitors. Two things to always remember about the legal profession:

 

1. They are only ever correct 50% of the time

 

2. Win or lose, they ALWAYS get paid

 

Judging by the number of posts you have made you have clearly been a member for a long time (or you are a very busy poster ;)), whilst I have only joined last night, so I have no wish to cross swords or fall out with anyone over this matter. I therefore think that until the original poster either gives more facts on the open forum or pm's you or I, it will be impossible for anyone to help him further. Also, I'm surprised at you advising to seek legal advice on this so soon. I thought the whole ethos of this site was for members of the public, like you and I, to fight banks, insurance companies, et al without legal assistance. It must be bad enough for this unfortunate individual to have the worry of fighting a large insurance company without him having the additional worry of how to pay his legal bill as well.

Donate to your favourite charities without it costing you a penny. For more details please visit www.insure4charity.co.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

JonChris,

 

As I said previously, there is no point in you & I crossing swords on this one.

 

I seriously doubt this person will find any solicitor in the UK who will represent him on a "no win, no fee" basis. If you are so confident about this, can I respectfully suggest that you pm details of this solicitor to the original poster. I see from your profile that you are a solicitor yourself; therefore would you or your practice be prepared to take on this case on a "no win, no fee" basis?

 

Regards your statement about the ombudsman, leaving your personal feelings aside for a moment, this individual must follow due process. Isn't this what this website advocates within the FAQ section and what you tell EVERY new member who joins, myself included? The ombudsman route therefore MUST be exhausted before going down the legal route.

Donate to your favourite charities without it costing you a penny. For more details please visit www.insure4charity.co.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

As before, I believe that you must go through the due process which is:

 

1. Complain to the life company. If no joy there then

 

2. Complain to the ombudsman. If no joy there then

 

3. Seek legal advice (ideally no win, no fee if you can get it)

Donate to your favourite charities without it costing you a penny. For more details please visit www.insure4charity.co.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...