Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Make sure the WS is sent 14 days before the hearing. You can e-mail the court theirs.  In the subject line put the case number, the names of the parties and "Witness Statement".  Obviously click on "Return Receipt". Send Simple Simon his by 2nd class post - all VCS are worth - and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • The outlet is in Camden Town and was set up in 2006, a year after my husband established the business, in addition to selling at exhibitions, online, shows, events, and having licensing agreements in some places overseas.  The only thing I have stopped doing since I got ill is the physical stuff, which I’m working on. The business has not changed name or anything like that either. I’m not sure where the original contract with Camden is but the management must still have it. My husband died in Jan 2017, and until Sept 2018, I would take the stock in every week; after that I was sending it in by post. I went in now and then when possible to re-do the display but that was about it. No one had access to any files until 2020. Moved house in 2020 thought would have to pull it all, Covid had just hit as well. The person in question said he would be interested in taking over and paying the rent etc. so I said I would let him sell the pictures for nothing as long as he would ‘keep it warm’ for me.  Obviously, everywhere was closed for lockdown. During this time I was working out how to go forward.  In May 2022 I told him I couldn’t  give anything away for free anymore, and put in place the wholesale agreement.  I’ve disregarded any discrepancies from before this date. I sent over the jpgs electronically, so I’ve still got them too. He hasn’t got any original files like .psds negatives or memory cards etc, I’ve got proof of all ownership/copyright. A co-op is whereby a small number of neighbours work on a rotational basis so they each of them can have time off, that way everyone doesn’t need to be there at the same time, he had never been an employee of mine.  The only reason I allowed him to have the files in the first place as I didn’t want to lose that side of the business.  It’s a good, constant source of income. However, the rent was becoming crippling as I believed there was something fishy going on well before this as there’s so much cash dealt with there, and I couldn’t go in regularly in person, and I’m sure sales weren’t being recorded properly and cash was being pocketed. My husband was too busy to be doing any stock control properly, he wasn't really into paperwork, and the guy who was ‘helping’ me after my husband's death, was making things very difficult for me to implement a solid stock control system by refusing to co-operate on simple things like using email etc. which I thought was a smokescreen, so I severed ties with him just before I made the agreement in question. I sent about 100 images, jpg files, sent via We Transfer. I’ve got the confirmation of which files were sent with dates. I will have to go through closed bank accounts and previous tax returns to get a proper estimate.   Before I made this agreement, I was selling retail there, this is a wholesale agreement so I’ll have to do some calculations but it is definitely in the thousands.  I haven’t got his his home address, and I don't think he's got any sizeable assets. I’m also worried that he might send the files overseas and start selling them there. I know he’s not stupid enough to sell them online. He knows for sure how serious this is, but he’s been chancing it and thinks I’m stupid, if not soft and stupid. I don’t know if this would work but I am thinking that when he does contact me, I tell him we need to talk, tell him I know what he’s been up to, and strongly urge him not to order any more prints from wherever he is having them printed because it will make things much worse for him if he does. Then when I do tell him about the gravity of the situation, maybe a few days later, I think it will scare him into complying because the consequences definitely trump the few quid he thinks he is saving by getting his own printing done. Tell him an amount that I want back for lost revenue, and make it clear that if he doesn’t destroy the files and if I find out he is still doing it at any point down the line, I will seek prosecution for copyright infringement and fraud, which I will. I don’t know how I can enforce any of this without involving the courts though. I will be able to tell, though, and he will know this. And the only reason I am doing this now rather than before, is that I couldn’t prove anything until now.  It was screamingly obvious from the beginning though, as he wasn’t ordering enough from me to pay the rent, let alone make a profit. If I decided to come down like him lie a ton of bricks straight away, how would I go about a cease and desist, would I have to get one from the court? And what do I do about the stock he currently holds? It has also occurred to me that he might file for bankruptcy or similar if things get heavy, where would that leave me? I could put the feelers out for a brand-new person to take it on, obviously without giving them access to files, that is an option. But that comes with its own set of issues. Also, would there be any implications for me, if I kept quiet for now? Let him order again from me as if nothing has happened, as it will be any day and I want to get all my ducks in a row first ideally….   Thanks again
    • I’ve also just realised their online website they’ve got 12 photographs of my vehicle, including close ups of the inside?? Not sure why that’s relevant.  The time stamp on the first photo is 13:57, the PCN incident time is 14:12. 
    • I’m tempted to send a letter to the company outlining the reasons why I think their PCN is illegitimate. I guess will technically be an appeal.  Their documentation states they won’t discuss over phone, I also don’t want them to have my email address.    re signage on entrance, having looked at land registry, the whole road is private, and when you turn into the road off the highway, there is a sign on the lamppost about 20m in, again not noticeable and on the other side of the road.  I feel like I am in a difficult position with this, I understand that I may have a good chance of not having to pay, but at the same token the stress this is already causing me makes me feel like it’s not worth the £60!
    • Well done with the photo. Of course the signage is insufficient.  PPM are not interested in competent management of a car park, they are interested in catching drivers out so they can issue their PCNs. For a start, according to their trade associations' Codes of Practice, they are supposed to have signage at the entrance. Any e-mail reply from the company and whether they will/won't/can/can't get the invoice cancelled?    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

estoppel


tiger7861
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3620 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good stuff Tiger

 

Are you still instructing your sols or are you going to a direct access Barrister?

 

If the latter, you will need to hold a conference with him ASAP. don't forget that he require you to undertake a great deal of legal admin and provide him with the same.

 

Now that you are undertaking this route, do not engage with ex-daughter-in-law, UNLESS, you receive any positive correspondence from her to resolve this matter that you consider to be satisfactory.

 

 

Good luck Tiger.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

 

Just one final q will does adhd issue effect this claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 296
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Just one final q will does adhd issue effect this claim?

 

 

What is this adhd issue, a matter that affects her or her children?

As far as I know, adhd does not provideany grounds to that give rise to a propriety estopple claim.

Based upon all matters posted here by you, the issue and only issue for the Courtto decide upon is – did you promise the property or a share therein to thedaughter – in-l aw.

This case will be decided by the Courtbased upon the circumstances to it. Ifyou never made any such promise to the daughter-in-law (ex), the Court will recognise that no such promise wasmade or given by you to her, as youhave clearly stated here.

Kind regards

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is this adhd issue, a matter that affects her or her children?

As far as I know, adhd does not provideany grounds to that give rise to a propriety estopple claim.

Based upon all matters posted here by you, the issue and only issue for the Courtto decide upon is – did you promise the property or a share therein to thedaughter – in-l aw.

This case will be decided by the Courtbased upon the circumstances to it. Ifyou never made any such promise to the daughter-in-law (ex), the Court will recognise that no such promise wasmade or given by you to her, as youhave clearly stated here.

Kind regards

The Mould

 

Today they breached the pre trial document checklist

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today they breached the pre trial document checklist

 

Please confirm the exact directions from the Court as regards pre-trial review and the paragraphs therein that Claimant has not complied with.

 

Please also post up Claimant's statement of case (hid POC's) and your Defence against the same - minus all personal details of course.

 

 

The more details that you provide here to us, the better and greater understanding of the case that you are Defending, sooooooooo, don't be shy, give us all details so that we can assist you by providing our advice/support/ opinion and case law on this matter that holds in your favour.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Please confirm the exact directions from the Court as regards pre-trial review and the paragraphs therein that Claimant has not complied with.

 

Please also post up Claimant's statement of case (hid POC's) and your Defence against the same - minus all personal details of course.

 

 

The more details that you provide here to us, the better and greater understanding of the case that you are Defending, sooooooooo, don't be shy, give us all details so that we can assist you by providing our advice/support/ opinion and case law on this matter that holds in your favour.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

The per-trial checklist is complete trial is next week I have hired my barrister today the solicitor is sending the file to him tomorrow all in costing me inc solicitors fee 3500 for the trial the barrister was called to bar In 1979 and has written a book on estoppel so nows his stuff according to my solicitor

Just one q at any point could the court not have thrown this course out ie not letting it go to trial.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although the court could have struck the claim out on its own motion it's rarely that proactive and, when it does, usually only does so in extremely clear cases ( such as where there is simply no legal claim or the remedy doesn't exist). It is of course open to the parties to apply to strike out but as the trial is next week you may as well get on with that now, subject to whatever legal advice you are given.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although the court could have struck the claim out on its own motion it's rarely that proactive and, when it does, usually only does so in extremely clear cases ( such as where there is simply no legal claim or the remedy doesn't exist). It is of course open to the parties to apply to strike out but as the trial is next week you may as well get on with that now, subject to whatever legal advice you are given.

Thank u all my solicitor advised the most expensive barrister was about 10k he advised that your case is not that complexed and the barrister he advised has alot of experience in estoppel he has even written a chapter about estoppel in a book #

does hiring a less expensive barrister make any difference?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i could have gone with the direct access option which would have been even cheaper i was quoted about 2500 for the trial which is not bad but had to do all the paperwork my self the barrister needs to now the relevant info to fight the case in a particular way apparentley.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hopefully, how much time has been allocated in the court? Often the judge reserves a decision to later date, even if all the witnesses have been heard and legal representations have been made.

This case seems fairly straight forward, but you never know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank u all my solicitor advised the most expensive barrister was about 10k he advised that your case is not that complexed and the barrister he advised has alot of experience in estoppel he has even written a chapter about estoppel in a book #

does hiring a less expensive barrister make any difference?

 

 

Your only concern ought to be as regards counsel's experience in this area of law, not the costs of such legal representation. Experience and success with always override costs, except, in certain circumstances, that is to say, that just because "Joe Bloggs & Co" are the biggest driveway installers with over 25 years experience, this does not make them the best nor masters of their trade as opposed a new comer on the same market.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Mould's quite right. Counsel's fees tend to be commensurate with their year of Call rather than their actual knowledge of a particular area so you could get a cheaper young barrister who really knows his stuff or an older more expensive one who isn't as good at this particular thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Mould's quite right. Counsel's fees tend to be commensurate with their year of Call rather than their actual knowledge of a particular area so you could get a cheaper young barrister who really knows his stuff or an older more expensive one who isn't as good at this particular thing.[/
Edited by tiger7861
Link to post
Share on other sites

This gentleman was called in 1979

He is the author of "Tenancies and Estoppel - after London & Quadrant v Bruton" (Modern Law Review vol 63 no 3 (May 2000).Areas of Practice

Family Law, Civil Law, Adoption, Matrimonial Finance, Civil Partnerships, Housing, Children - Public Law - Care, Children - Private Law, TLATA and Cohabitation, Chancery, International Child Abduction, Inheritance Act, Land and Property, Landlord and Tenant, Professional Conduct, Mediation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your only concern ought to be as regards counsel's experience in this area of law, not the costs of such legal representation. Experience and success with always override costs, except, in certain circumstances, that is to say, that just because "Joe Bloggs & Co" are the biggest driveway installers with over 25 years experience, this does not make them the best nor masters of their trade as opposed a new comer on the same market.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

 

In my witness statement I forget to mention something can I alter it ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you want to change it?

 

 

Usually, in the lead up to a trial both sides exchange witness statements at the same time. Changing your witness statement later is a bit unfair if you have had the benefit of their statement. Also note that if you are already past the time the court ordered you to serve the statement, a later amendment would not be compliant with the court order. Best to discuss this with your solicitor but I suspect not a good idea unless the change is genuinely necessary.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...