Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Aktiv Kapital spoof debt [was also SB] - i issued a claim for costs/compo - they folded and coughed **WON**


lukeman
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3914 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ladies/Gents

 

I would like to share my success against Aktiv Kapital.

 

AK has been bullying and harassing me since 2009 for debt that didn't exist.

I bough a fridge with a comet edge card in 2006 and shortly after it was delivered I changed my mind and sent it back.

 

I didn't hear anything from them until AK started calling me day and night

and threatening me with court action and subsequently registered a default against my credit file.

 

I also discovered that AK had illegally changed the default date by 20 months.

 

Fast forward June/ July.

 

I sent Aktiv Kapital a letter stating I did not owe the alleged debt and also this debt is statute barred anyway.

 

They ignored my first letter, then I sent them DPA notice to stop processing my data and gave them 21 days to comply.

Again they did not comply and letter before action was sent.

 

Then I issued a claim online for damages and notes as per above.

 

They filed a defence within 2-3 days of issuing the claim online and said they would defend.

 

For the past 2 months they have tried to bully me into submission saying they had strong case and they would defend vigorously.

 

I stood my ground through out and ordered them to remove the default immediately

and pay me compensation for all the things they had put me through for many years.

 

Finally once the hearing date had been confirmed and clock started ticking they offered £105

and to mark the alleged debt as settled.

 

I refused straight away.

 

Then finally they say they would settle and pay me full amount claimed and remove the default within 72 hours.

 

I again refused as I had now prepared all the bundles and incurred further costs

and I ask them to pay for them and surprise surprise they agreed and further paid for preparing the bundle.

 

Aktiv Kapital are bunch of cow boys and I would advise all of you good people out there to stand your ground

when you had been violated by DCA's and AK are B*****s for making up debt when there was none.

 

Bytheway;

before I issue the claim I tried the OFT and they were not helpful and infact very rude to me over the phone

so from now on Her Majesty Court are way forward for me.

 

cheers all

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you need to get in touch with batty on this thread.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?381502-Defence-After-a-Set-Aside-Hearing-**-SUCCESS-I-WON-**/page9

 

Between you, you must take this to the OFT and to Watchdog – Aktiv are under OFT sanctions and between you, you could see them fined £100,000.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good idea and don't mind it all.

 

Bytheway, they attributed their attempt to collect money by fraudulent means to admin error.

 

Fortunately for me I found a lot of criminating data for them to back off and settle.

 

Furthermore the main fairy-tale that is normally told by Banks and DCA's about not being able to change or delete an entry with CRA's is a complete lie. AK did this within 72 hours but technically it can be done the same day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congrats, Lukewarm. I just won against AK in court aswell! Would love to know more, as I'm hoping further action can be taken against these people

 

Congrats to you too mate. Fantastic result.

 

On what grounds are you planning the further action you mention above. I expect elements that were not mentioned in your original POC.

 

In my POC I mentioned;

 

1) NOT the Debtor in question - don't owe this debt

2) Debt was statute barred anyway

3) harassment - threatening and bullying

4) Breach of Data Protection

 

In hindsight I should have brought three different cases I against them or at least two cases. Also I wish I had claimed higher cost but most importantly I was after the default removal and they did remove and settled in full in the end.

 

Let me anything you want to know or discuss otherwise just message me anytime.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...