Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok Thank you DX will do just that . will keep you up dated.
    • dispute it with whichever cra provider is now showing it. simply state the a/c is from 2015 and was defaulted (date) and should not have re appeared. probably getting ready to sell it on. dx
    • Hi Caught Shoplifting at John Lewis - Retail loss Prevention/Other shoplifting allegations. - Consumer Action Group Thanks a lot for commenting this experience of yours. I do understand this might be something that you are not willing to talk about anymore but the same exact scenario happened with me today at John Lewis. They took my name/ address/ a picture of me holding a signed banned letter. the only question I've got is will I be contacted by the police and will this be recorded as police caution or criminal record?  I would really really appreciate if you could let me know how it went.  I am so so so ashamed of myself and am really making changes in my life I feel like I've lost myself for a period of my life but anyways it would be really great to hear back. Thanks 
    • I thought Delinquent ment "missing payments" its active so assumimg it can be seen ? also this is the only thing change on my credit file and that in its self being re added has dropped my credit score . the debt is SB and did drop off my credit file so how have or how can they re add it again ?
    • ah sorry delinquent means it dead so not hurting your file. dx  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Redundancy-long term sick- UNUM help?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4050 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

I'm so sorry if this is all over - its very complicated - i do forget things so if something is not making sence please ask/tell me so i can explain

I am on long term sick and have been covered by the workplace policy for PHI with UNUM. (i have been employed since 2005)

As the policy is with my employer i can not get any information direct from UNUM, i have to speak to my "line manager"

The situation that has now occurred is...

 

The business site where my work is based is closing with over 500 people being made redundant.

I am still awaiting to be told officially about this, my income will cease end of June. No one can give me information about what is happening. I was told i was not included in collective consultations due to not having my address or phone number on system (i receive a pay slip every month, so they do have it) - they got in touch with me via a work friend and facebook.

 

From what has been hinted at via emails - the PHI scheme will not cover redundancy so i will not be entitled to any pay out (ive read about sat redundancy and i would qualify for this)

 

I suffer with depression and anxiety - obviously the situation is not helping me :(

While i am gutted for all my work collages who are in the horrible situation (lots have already left and in new jobs, yey!) I just feel totally pushed aside and going to find out last minute that my life has totally hit the fan

 

can some one please help with these questions

1. should I of been contacted to be included with the 90 day consultation (i read something about they consult with reps, would that be reason that they did consult i just couldn't get hold of?)

2. as i have been employed for 8years my minimum notice would be 8weeks, this date has now passed - what does this mean?

3. can the refuse to give me the enhanced redundancy as i am on PHI

4. Holiday entitlement - do they have to pay me for all unused holidays or because im on PHI i am not entitled?

5. i can not remember signing anything to say they t&c's of my contract had changed when on the PHI scheme, so can i lose out on my benefits

 

Im so sorry i have a million and one questions but im so stuck.

If any more information is needed im willing to give it, thanks for reading x

Link to post
Share on other sites

What are you off sick with and how long have you been off?

 

Hello and thank you for your reply. I have depression and anxiety - I have been off since 2009.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not rely on hearsay. You are being paid by UNUM under the terms and conditions of your insurance policy, not by your employer. Check the T&Cs of your policy (http://unum.co.uk/downloads/) and contact UNUM if unsure.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not rely on hearsay. You are being paid by UNUM under the terms and conditions of your insurance policy, not by your employer. Check the T&Cs of your policy (//unum.co.uk/dow nloads/[/url]) and contact UNUM if unsure.

 

Hello and thanks for your input.

The policy was taken out by my employer - I cant ask UNUM as they refer me back to my line manager (who says she is chasing the information).

The cover ends when my employment ends, as the site is closing my employment is ending too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and thanks for your input.

The policy was taken out by my employer - I cant ask UNUM as they refer me back to my line manager (who says she is chasing the information).

The cover ends when my employment ends, as the site is closing my employment is ending too.

 

When did they say this? It sounds very odd they won't speak to someone getting paid under the policy for a number of years.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When did they say this? It sounds very odd they won't speak to someone getting paid under the policy for a number of years.

 

UNUM say they cant discuss anything with me as I am not the policy holder.

I have even tried to contact unum via email for a"general question"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not entirely sure which T&Cs apply to your exact policy as there are multiple sets on the website. Assuming you have the Group Income Protection Policy under the latest set of T&Cs, (http://resources.unum.co.uk/downloads/Policy_Conditions_GIPPOL_ALL_112012_web.pdf?2db98667-4835-6a94-a22c-e6c426ea374f), it seems that you will not get payment under clause 7.7.1 (b) as payments stop if you cease to be an employee. However under clause 8.4 if the policyholder (i.e. employer) ceases to carry on business entirely you would still be entitled to basic benefit despite non-payment of premiums.

 

If you are on long-term sick leave you are still entitled to a redundancy payment from the employer. If the proper consultation procedures are not followed then (perhaps) it could be unfair dismissal entitling you to a higher payout (can't speculate on this until it has actually happened). Arguably it can be unfair dismissal if the redundancy is wrongful due to failure to take account of the effect on PHI, but there is conflicting case law on this and unlikely to aplpy if everyone at the business site is being amde redundant.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not entirely sure which T&Cs apply to your exact policy as there are multiple sets on the website. Assuming you have the Group Income Protection Policy under the latest set of T&Cs, ([resources.unum.co.uk/downloads/Policy_Conditions_GIPPOL_ALL_112012_web.pdf?2db98667-4835-6a94-a22c-e6c426ea374f[/url]), it seems that you will not get payment under clause 7.7.1 (b) as payments stop if you cease to be an employee. However under clause 8.4 if the policyholder (i.e. employer) ceases to carry on business entirely you would still be entitled to basic benefit despite non-payment of premiums.

 

If you are on long-term sick leave you are still entitled to a redundancy payment from the employer. If the proper consultation procedures are not followed then (perhaps) it could be unfair dismissal entitling you to a higher payout (can't speculate on this until it has actually happened). Arguably it can be unfair dismissal if the redundancy is wrongful due to failure to take account of the effect on PHI, but there is conflicting case law on this and unlikely to aplpy if everyone at the business site is being amde redundant.

 

Thank you so much for replying.

 

I have asked the line manager questions and they remain unanswered but from the information you gave me has shed a little light (i need to read read and read again for it to sink in).

This is how i have read the above.

 

From my understanding, only the site where i was employed is closing. (other sites are still open). I don't think it is wrongful as the site will not be there and it would be imposable for me to travel to other sites as they are over 200 miles away.

 

I would be entitled to redundancy, would this be the enhanced or statutory?

 

how can i find out if correct consultation procedures have been carried out?

 

I really am appreciative of your time, i feel like i am finally getting my head around things

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...