Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • no dont,, and they won't know anyway. unless the payment came from you say by cash using your debit card or a transfer from another bank account in your name too then it doesn't count anyway. dx  
    • How do you make an email a pdf ?  All I want to know is under which law I can be charged for not paying her debts 
    • I have tried to upload some it won't let me. I have copied and pasted below this is the standard reply I am receiving from everyone. I also know that she changed her bank account so none of her payments would go through when she moved. I have sent the below to the police and solicitors again get told to pay it otherwise I will be reported and I have no idea what I can be reported for. Council Tax Ref: 2432xxxx   Property Address:    Website:  www.iow.gov.uk/counciltax   Email:      [email protected]     Dear Mr xxx   Further to our telephone call today, I can confirm there is nil balance due on the above account. I can see no outstanding liability in your name for Council Tax purposes for 4 xxx Road.   Yours sincerely,   Cerys Customer Advisor   Visit www.iow.gov.uk/counciltax to make payments, apply for Local Council Tax Support, register for paperless billing, report a change and set up direct debits
    • Thanks guys. So, an update on this. One of the Directors called me earlier in the month. Not sure if they were pleading ignorance, but they genuinely seemed shocked at what I was saying about OPS. They said that once I was made Director, they wanted to discuss a way forward with me on this issue. I presume that meant putting in a solution that would mean that residents stop getting ticketed. Good result there, if so. Interestingly, a few days after, one of OPS's goons arrived at our site. One of my neighbours rang my doorbell, warning me that OPS were taking pictures of my car (which I left outside without a permit), and then were hiding behind one of our flats. I went over to confront said goon and gave them a piece of my mind; telling them that they were scammers and were trespassing, therefore should leave ASAP, or I'll take it further. Came back an hour later and was pleasantly surprised to see that they didn't ticket me, despite me not having a permit up. Not sure what this means, but maybe the Director and MA got spooked by emails and finally whitelisted me? I haven't heard a peep about my PCNs either, though no formal email to say they've been cancelled. Either way, very interesting results, which may indicate that my message is getting into their heads. I'll keep you guys updated as I hear more...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

very old CCJ passed around everyone - help.


rubymay30
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4090 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a CCJ charging order put on my property in 2007 HFC credit card for £3.777 by Restons.

 

i agreed to pay £2 a week at the time as i was not working and was seriously depressed,

 

i have never missed a payment and still pay.

 

The debt was passed on to Marlin Financial services in 2008

asking me to contact them to agree payment terms.

 

I just ignored them and carried on paying £2 a month.

 

In April 2010 i had a letter from Mortimer Clarke Solicitors basically saying i need to increase payments debt now up to £4006,

 

i had another letter from them in October 2010 saying 8% interest per annum is being added debt by then was £4972.

 

In July 2012 a letter arrived from Marlin with a statement of account balance owing £3950.

It states on the letter that NO CONTRACTUAL INTEREST IS PAYABLE ON THE AMOUNT OUTSTANDING.

 

The original court application in 2007 says the the charging order is for (including any costs and interest) £3777,

 

does not include further interest payable on the judgement debt and the Judgement order did not provide for payments by instalments.

Its all very confusing.

 

Most recent letter from Mortimer Clarke was asking me to up payments directly to them.

 

I have sent a letter to them asking for interest to be removed still waiting for a reply.

 

I am just really confused please help lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

own thread created.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

see like you've been done over here.

 

take the Judgement date

 

workout how much you have paid at £2PCW till today.

 

the remainder of £3777 will be what is needed to be paid to get the CO removed.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...