Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Debt Management LTD/Barclays bank


manther
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5809 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Could anyone please please help me with this.......... i have recently recieved a letter from Debt Management Ltd in Edinburgh.

 

They are chasing me for a debt dating back to 1996, its for £160.

 

Although i cannot remember this debt, i know i did bank with barclays when i was 18 so i am not going to lie and say this has nothing to do with me.

 

I phoned them to ask what it was for as this is the first contact i have had from them, they explained and i told them that i couldn't remember the debt.

 

The letter that they sent was threatening court action, i asked if i could pay the debt in weekly instalments they refused, but said i could pay half this month and half next month, the first £80 was supposed to be paid on tues but i haven't paid it as i have had a few people telling me that they cannot chase me as the debt is more than 6 years old.

 

Could someone please explain the law on old debts before i make contact with them again.

 

Also has anyone had any dealings with them before if so with what results.

 

I really would appreciate some help on this as i am losing sleep:(

 

thanking anyone in advance for taking the time to both read this problem and any advice they may have.

 

look forward to hearing your replys guys

 

manther x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I'll have a go lol

 

If you are contacted about a debt where there has been NO contact for 6 years then the debt is statute bared, in otherwords you do not have to pay them. There are a few exceptions, one being if a CCJ was obtained for the debt. When I say "contact" it actually means acknowledged, which you haven't. There is a template, on the other site that I use, that tells them that you believe the debt is barred and to stop hassling you. I've pasted the template here, hope that was ok...

 

 

A copy of the letter to use if you believe the 'debt' is barred under the Limitations Act

 

Name of Creditor

Address of Creditor

 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re: Account No/Reference No:

 

No debt is acknowledged to you. You have contacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself.

 

I would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 “an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.”.

 

The last correspondence/payment/acknowledgement of this debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from me in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, I suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against me to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

I await your written confirmation that no further contact will be made concerning the above account and confirmation that this matter is now closed.

 

I look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

(Your signature)

Pam.

 

If anything I've said helps you then please feel free to tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that pam, i will try it and see what happens.

 

Its not that i am not willing to pay the debt, but as far as i am concerned it was a little over 10 years ago, i have had only 2 permanent addresses, i have been on the electrol register for the whole time, so it's not like i've been hiding from them. It looks like they are just trying their luck.

 

Thanks again and i will let u know the outcome:)

 

manther x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Me again Pam, a few other things i have just noticed with this letter:

 

1- It is addressed to me in my old name, my name changed in 1998.

 

2 - The return address is a PO box number

 

3 - There is no signature at the bottom of the letter.

 

If they dispute this, what would be my next course of action please

 

manther x

Link to post
Share on other sites

provided the debt has not been acknowledged in writing and you have not made a payment against it for 6 years it would certainly be statute barred. TO be honest it would be entirely up to you if you paid it off or not.

 

a little bit more info here >>

 

National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 25 Liability For Debts And The Limitation Act

Link to post
Share on other sites

Flipin heck they are trying it on! I would send the letter off and see what happens. I doubt very much indeed that they will dispute it. If they do let us know here and I'll check out the next stage.

  • Confused 1

Pam.

 

If anything I've said helps you then please feel free to tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Pam, its REALLY appreciated.

 

I must say this is the first time i have seen and used the website, and it has been a good experience so far.......very helpful thank you:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I have an in interest in this thread.

 

Last week i received a letter from these asking to confirm my address. After trawling the internet i found this site and binned the letter.

 

This morning i recieved a letter stating that they have purchased the debt from B/Card on December 14th 2007. I haven lived at this address for over 10yrs.

 

How does the Limitations act operate with B/Card selling the Debt, this is of cause if they actually have.

 

I plan to send the barred template letter within this thread, but does the fact that it has been sold effect the Limitations act.

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi,

 

I have just received letters from these people chasing me for a debt which is 10 years old. They sent this letter to my old address and the last one being that they were sending round walking collectors!

 

I have been sent the same thing from another company called Thames Credit when I moved three years ago and speaking to a lawyer I told them about the Limitation Act.

 

I called these people and asked about this and told them that it had been resolved with this other company and told them about the limitation act and the bloke told me that under another one I was still liable to pay. I haven't given them my correct address as I am concerned by this company and that a previous one has chased this before.

 

Where do I stand on this?

 

All advice greatfully received!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...