Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CPS Enforcement Parking Fine on my drive way


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4408 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good afternoon all,

 

I have recently moved to a new flat which is on a private road and the landlord has employed CPS Enforcement of Somerset to control unauthorised parking.

I have never lived anywhere which requires me to display a permit and on one occasion I unfortunately forget to display it. I would like to add that I was parked in front of my garage on my own off road drive way and the ticket is time stamped at 01:59AM.

 

I don't know whether being on my drive way has any bearing on having to pay it but I have now passed the 7 day payment time that allows for a discounted settlement and the fine now stands at £90 for another 7 days before being escalated to debt collection and a court application.

 

I have read about ignoring these idiots, and I would appreciate any advice you may have. The time of the ticket concerns me I work shifts and my girlfriend feels quite uncomfortable about the fact that these people could be loitering around at 2AM.

 

The sign displayed upon entrance to the road is attached to a lamp post and is unreadable from the car and well above eye level if on foot.

 

Regards,

 

Chris.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, I am a bit concerned that if I don't pay it are they likely to return and clamp my car? I commute quite a distance everyday so if I get clamped I'm stuffed for getting to work..

 

Chris.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not a fine as they can only be given out by police and courts, etc.

 

It is a penalty charge, most of the time these are not payable and any compnay would have trouble persuading a court otherwise.

 

Is the permit now on your car, if so, I veryt much doubtn whether it could now be clamped.

 

I'm sure someone will be along to offer more help.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not even a penalty charge. It is a request for payment of an invoice you do not owe them. No court would even entertain it, but then again, these cowboys won't go anywhere near a court. They cannot return and clamp if you don't pay them; if they tried that you could lawfully cut the clamp off (it is a trespass on your property) and sue them and, more significantly, the Landlord for any losses.

 

I would suggest that you have strong words with the Landlord or whoever contracted these parasites, and remind them that under standard Principal/Agent law they will be held responsible for anything the monkeys do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...