Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFC Playing up again!!! advice needed please.


joe90-123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4411 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks for the response Dx . Could you please point me in the right direction for the template letter for a failed SAR ?.

 

I realise the ims21 is a very busy person and i think this would take up just too much of their time to be honest ,

as without the exact original percentage rate it would be hard to reverse rebuild the account

 

I did find one tiny ( a single line ) entry within the huge SAR pack which states my account history started in Jan 2000

but the earlist piece of account information is from 2005.

 

Any thoughts?

 

Joe90.

Edited by joe90-123
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I think reconstructing the loan is going to be very very difficult to be honest.

 

All you have to go on at the moment is a list of repayments and from reading an earlier post it seems that the repayments changed. Was this because you got behind with the loan since normally only one payment is made per month as you will appreciate.

 

Also the change in payment amount is interesting....was this due to catching up with arrears or maybe the loan had a variable interest rate.

 

In some instances I would suggest a speculative claim but that is going to be kippered here due to the age of the loan and of course there is no loan reference number to put in to any claim documentation. That virtually guarantees a refusal by the bank.

 

At this point it is not a case that can be taken to court either, again due to the lack of documentation.

 

Apart from the list of repayments you made, can you not recall anything further about this loan....amount borrowed or length of time the loan was originally taken out over?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for looking in ims21 , i think i now have the money (£6582.00 ) hitting the account at the correct time ,

and i did not miss a single payment .

As for the fluctuations in the account payments i think it was an interest adjustment to begin with

and then later the interest went up and they added the ppi as a seperate payment.

After i cleared the main account with the cheque for £8559.79

they continued to charge the ppi payment until the the remaining balance ( which could only have been ppi) was refinaced with a further loan ( i know now how wrong this must sound and look ) but back then i was robing peter to pay paul.

 

Can you make anything of that at all? :)

 

Joe90

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll have a look and give some thoughts tomorrow

 

I fear that even if we could somehow come to a reconstruction (which may not be possible due to so many unknowns) there is another brick wall looming in that they would need some sort of reference/account number to work with.

 

back tomorrow

 

ims

  • Confused 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes threaten them with a report of their failure to the ICO.

 

i'd intimate you are not shy of taking them to court to PROVE

they have distroyed the missing stuff in the correct manner.

 

they MUST record HOW & WHEN it was done & by WHOM.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Dx , failed SAR letter sent off today recorded delivery , so we'll see what comes back from that !!!

and i would not hesitate at all to persue them through the courts for the info , my job is and has been for the last 20 years is a child care worker ,working with some of the most criminal youths in the north east so i'm no stranger to the courts and the staff at all of them and thanks to the hfc i have the finances to fund that line of compliance :)

 

Enclosed in a copy of the letter , does it seem ok?

 

 

The Data Compliance Manager

HFC Bank

Camden House West

The Parade

Birmingham

B1 3PY

 

01-03-2012

 

Your Ref: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Dear Ms/ Mrs xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx

 

Thank you for responding to my Subject access request dated 21st February 2012 , I have over the last 5 days carefully read and re-read it’s content and it is with disappointment that I find myself in correspondence with your team again to request that a full investigation is carried out as to the missing items from it’s record of fact .

 

I also note that in my original request I asked for all information on all accounts I have had with your company and that the request was not limited to the 3 accounts you have seen fit to furnish me with information on .

 

I have noted from an item within the request that I have been a customer since 7th of January 2000 and that I also had a loan from your company in the same month of that year .

 

Could I reiterate my request again for your investigating team to supply me with all information held within your systems , be they live or archived on all accounts not previously supplied in your Subject access request dated 21st February 2012 .

 

If you believe this information has been disposed of or destroyed it is your duty to supply me with a written record of the said items destruction , showing how it was done , when it was actioned and the persons position and full name in a fully legible form , this is a requirement under the Information commission office guide lines which I have confirmed today.

 

If you feel that you are unable or reluctant to supply myself with the above information, I am more than happy to issue court proceedings to force it’s release from your company .

 

I am sure this is a case of a simple oversight on behalf of your investigation team and that it can be resolved without having to pursue such an action .

 

Could you please confirm your receipt of this letter by return of post and I would expect to have a full reply with your findings within 14 calendar days ,which I think would be more than an adequate length of time for a full search of your archive and records to be carried out given the information I have supplied you with in my previous correspondence

 

Yours Faithfully

xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx

 

?

Edited by joe90-123
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Letter looks good to me....clear and concise and gives them the benefit of the doubt that it was an oversight.

 

As regards the calculations on the above account, I have to say I haven't been able to come up with anything sensible...there are too many unkowns I'm afraid.

 

Lets see what the failed SAR letter produces and take it from there

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers yet again ims .

 

14 days and counting :)

 

I will try and glean a little more information as to the figures , a loan % rate for the amount ( £6582.00 ) and length of loan .

 

Joe90

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Thanks for the question,

I did get a reply , but it was the usual " older than 6 years excuse" and that they could not find any record of it .

I did contact the Information commisioners Office ref the destruction certificate

and they have stated that the company does not have to keep or produce such a document .

I also contacted a specialist lawyer who deals with banking law ( as recomemded by the law commision )

to ask wether the use of evidence act would apply , but they also stated that this cannot be used in this kind of situation .

Court proceedings in this case would be of little use , as under law they do not have to keep such a record , so will be quite with in their rights to attend and state no such destruction documant exsists.

So in conclusion:

I will have the account rebuilt using my bank statements, and an estimated percentage rate of the time period and the opening amount , payments and the closing balance cheque,

and send the lot of to the FOS to see if they can force their hand and gleen a bit more information.

Given that i have had all three of the other cases upheld by the HFC , if i can show i had another earlier loan and give the best estimate ( with the evidence i have ) of the figures involved, I might get lucky:smile: .

 

Joe 90.

Edited by joe90-123
Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck,

 

I lost all my old statements so I guess I will have to pay my bank for about 8 years worth so I can chase the same thing.

 

Thanks for the response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may work out cheaper for you to SAR your bank and then get everything they have on you , including your bank statements .

Make sure you ask for as far back as you can get them , including ones from their archived accounts .

 

Joe 90.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...