Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Builder disappears with large deposit, later discovered he was recently bankrupted


Jasper1965
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4554 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A friend of mine recently employed a builder to build an extension for him.

 

Friend gave the builder £5,000 advance to cover materials and some labour costs etc.

A week later builder asked him for £2,500 to pay for the double glazing, friend wrote a cheque out to the third party whose name was supplied by the builder.

After another week builder then took a further £800 cash advance for materials.

 

Can you guess whats coming?

 

Builder hasn't been on job for five weeks now, doesn't answer phone only occasional texts in which he has admitted receipt of all monies and just blags for more time for a variety of reasons.

 

Some demolition work has occured which has resulted in the friends c.h. boiler now being exposed on an exterior wall, the garden looks like Berlin 1945 with all the mini digger tracks and earth piles and approx £500 of bricks, blocks and sand have materialised. No sign of double glazing and tbh the person cheque was made out to doesn't seem involved with double glazing anyway.:|

 

I've made some prelim checks on the builder since my friend told me what had happened and have discovered that he was bankrupted in November of this year, just before he took the first of the payments.

 

He's a sole trader and was bankriupted in the name Joe Bloggs t/a "Some development company UK" and has taken the money as a sole trader without the company name.

 

I'm not at all sure about insolvencies so wonder if anyone could help by answering some of the following questions please?

 

1) Was the builder acting lawfully by failing to declare his very recent bankruptcy?

2) As the money was advanced after the bankruptcy was finalised am I correct in assuming that it is not part of any bankruptcy arrangement nor should it ever become a part of any arrangement?

3) His formal notice to "sort it out" expires on the 31st Dec to date it has been ignored insofar as no work has been done and no further materials have well materialised and no offer to repay part or all of any deposit has been made.

4) Surprise surprise the shyster lives in a very large very expensive country home which is currently up for sale. In the worst case scenario is it worth my friend rushing him into Court in the hope there's enough equity in the property? What I really mean here is if the house is forced sale because of bankruptcy, can a creditor who is not a party to that bankruptcy still apply for a charging order or does this affect the rights of the original creditors?

5) Should the OR be made aware of any of this behaviour even if it's because the guy is blatantly running up huge debts outside those covered by his bankruptcy?

As of 03/03/12 please do not under any circumstances wait for my further input or guidance on any current thread or defence of a court claim I might have been involved in on or through Cag.

Jasper1965

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...