Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mandatory contract renewal and 3 months cancellation notice


tsugi
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4561 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

No. When I bought it, I used it no problem until I needed an update, then I found I had to do the service agreement. It now says on the website "Mandatory service agreement" - and they say it's always been that way, but they also say they spoke to me on the phone when I took out the service agreement; I couldn't have taken it out separately if it was mandatory when buying the software - plus - I couldn't have known I couldn't get the update without it, if the programme didn't run without it, as I wouldn't have known it needed an update if I couldn't open it, etc.

 

A moot point I suppose, as they're singing a different song. I am still working on the principle that I shouldn't be held to an agreement renewal without being asked whether I agree.

Link to post
Share on other sites

but this puts a different spin on things, it would seem that they are saying that it isn't the software + a service agreement, but a yearly licence for a service. To claim you will need to show that the contract you entered into was for the software only.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're ignoring my comments on distance selling etc., and have sent this by post:

 

--------

Payment for the above is now long overdue. Please settle the outstanding amount immediately. Failure to do so will lead to the claim being transferred to debt collection. If the claim is transferred to a debt collection agency or a Court of Law your Mamut licenses will, in accordance with the Mamut Service Agreement and the Mamut License Agreement, be reduced to the product Mamut Free until the account is settled.

--------

 

Doubly annoying, as the "Mamut Free" thing doesn't happen; the app says your service agreement is out of date, then quits. Do I just pay now? Debt collection, Court of Law, etc. and they've ignored the substance of my previous correspondence

Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, this one is a bit technical and quite odd - it will turn on the actual docs. It may be that you have bought a service and can cancel the renewal and keep the basic software, have bought only a licence or bought a licence with a renewal which may, or may not be enforceable. Depending which it is will depend on whether the distance selling rules or any of the above stuff is relevant. I don't think that they can enforce payment for the new year, but they might have be able to cut you off from the existing stuff.

 

Depending on the amount of money involved you might want to see a professional so they can review all the docs properly. Unfortunately there are limits to these forums, the art is in recognising when we've reached that. To be fair I need to say that I'm not sure of your position and would not want to advise based on the limited information we have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the agreement, which is not accessible on their main product or support pages, but which you can access by going through 4 separate links.

 

http://www.mamut.com/media/products/license/Mamut_User_Agreement_int.pdf

 

I realise we're at the end of what can be usefully put forward on the forum, but any final thoughts based on the agreement (which does not come with the software, but which you have to hunt) would be gratefully received - and NOT taken as anything other than learned opinion!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...