Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Robinson Way CCA Request


jimmyk83
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4611 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I have a debt from a now closed Lloyds bank account that has been passed to Robinson Way Debt Collectors. I've been reading around the site and used your template to send a CCA request. A week or so later they responded saying they had received my request.

 

I have received no agreement from them and they have since sent two more letters: one threatening a home visit, and another 'friendly' one entitled 'Where have we gone wrong', saying we wil listen to your circumstances, we know how hard it is being in debt etc etc. I think it's a sort of good cop, bad cop thing. :)

 

Anyway, can someone advise where to go from here, what letter I need to send them now.

 

Any advice is much appreciated

 

James

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was an account with an overdraft. I got stuck in a cycle of bank charges and ended up going way over my limit. Eventually they closed the account.

 

I didn't realise that CCA's didn't apply to bank accounts. I'm not very good with all this type of thing I'm afraid. How can I be sure these people actually own the debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I can tell from the letters I have here, they are collecting on behalf of Lloyds. Their letters contain a reference number, and say amount due to Lloyds TSB. They say that payment must be made to them, however I have read people on this forum say that you should never pay a DCA, always pay the creditor directly. What would you advise?

 

I'm a little confused about this though, as when they wrote back to me from the CCA request they said they had requested the documentation from their client. They also returned my £1 cheque. Does this just mean that they have contacted Lloyds and Lloyds have ignored it because it's a bank account debt?

 

As for the bank charges, I am currently composing an email to the CEO asking for them back. I have written to Lloyds before asking for the charges to be repaid with no success. What are my chances of getting anything back do you think? And yes, I'm certain that a large portion of the debt is from charges. The total amount owed is £4860. I can't remember the exact amount I claimed for when I last wrote to them (it was a while ago), but it was certainly several thousand. At one point I was being charged £90-£120 month after month.

 

Unfortunately I don't have the statements they sent me when I last did a SAR, is there any way to get a list of charges without doing this? It's £10 that I could really do without spending!

 

Your time is much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they originaly include them with the SAR?

 

The problem you have is that you do realy need to see what charges they have added to be able to pay them back. Did they reply to your other letters about reclaiming? - and if so what did they say?

 

Here is a link a lot of the site Team use to give info on claiming back charges - could be worth a read for you.

 

http://www.consumerwiki.co.uk/index.php/FAQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry, when you say "Did they originaly include them with the SAR?", what do you mean? A list of charges? If so, then yes they did. However this was a good couple of years ago, and stupidly i've since binned them.

 

They did reply when I wrote to them previously, but again this was a couple of years ago (during the hold for the test case). They gave the standard rebuttal, told me to wait for the court outcome etc. When the court case was over I think they wrote again (can't find that letter either), saying that the charges are fair, you've no case. They did write in the original letter that 'it appears you are in financial hardship', which was true then, and is still the case now. However this is the first time I've attacked from the hardship angle.

 

I've read of some people going straight for the CEO of the company and having success, so I'm going to give that a shot and then go to the Ombudsman if that fails.

 

Ta for the link, looks like some useful stuff in there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...