Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Claiming back arrears charges etc - where to start.


Pupter
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4678 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I've just managed to stop our eviction and this has thrown up the possibility I can try and claim back all my arrears charges etc. I once had a mortgage with Mortgages PLC going back 10-5 years ago, I know there were charges on there from a time of redundancy, we are no longer with them. My current mortgage used to be with one company but they have sold it to another. So

 

1) Where do I start?

2) Mortgages PLC turned me down in 2006, can I still try again on the basis that we now know that we can go for it?

3) Would it be safe to go for the current company or can this cause problems, the judge suspended the warrant and said as long as we clear the current arrears we are safe

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you've not already got them

you will need to sar them for all the statements

 

and saw you won, see it wasn't that bad!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, surprisingly it wasn't that bad! Thanks to CAG.

 

Right will dig about on here and find the SAR, so is it ok to send to current and mortgages PLc? What about the fact they turned me down in 2006, does that mean I can't try again as it is after three years or can I argue that since the world has moved on and the Redstone case I have cause to believe I am entitled to ask again now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I've just posted this is my old thread and realised it is probably better served here. Any advice gratefully received yet again

.

Right

 

The mortgage company have seen my insurance paperwork at last and have confirmed I had cover the whole time they have sent me a letter today saying that they will refund me an amount but it is £243 less than all the premiums they have actually charged me. So I need to write to them I imagined and query this, but I have one question. Can I ask for the refund to include the difference plus the interest on the amounts ie the 8%?

 

Also there are charges going back the past year or so, they have also said in the letter they normally charge a £35 for every month you are in arrears BUT won't charge it if I stick to my payment plan (which I will barring something unforeseen of course!) so again a couple of questions. Do I dare go after the current company or is that risking their wrath and if I go for it, I guess its the SAR route again? Also if they will charge this only if I don't pay one month from now on, can I then argue that it doesn't actually cost them £35 or £50 a month to administer an arrears account if they are prepared to waive it now?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would stick to ONE threads per debt/issue

 

do you want them merged?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did think that but thought as I was now an eviction succes rather than ongoing people would probably not read through to the end of that thread. Shall I just post the questions on here now and ignore that other thread completely so as not to confuse things? As this is an ongoing issue I need a little help with and am not sure where to turn next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...