Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4724 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

EDF have just sent me a letter saying that they are upgrading my account,

They say that instead of paying a set amount every month i now have been put on monthly billing, and if that monthly bill is above what i have already paid i will have to pay the difference. This would be fine in the summer, but what happens if we have another bad winter.I feel that i am being pressured into paying by direct debit.

Can they do this without my agreement?:mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Surely, not. I'm with EDF and will soon be leaving them, as they had the gall to send me a letter threatening legal action for non-payment, when I tried several times a week over the past fortnight, online and by phone. I won't give you the whole story as it very tedious to repeat, depicting, as it does, farcical behaviour on their part.

 

I have a very strong suspicion it is beause they want to punish me for usually not paying the full amount in one go. Anyway, I emailed a very snotty complaint to them and, predictably, received no reply. As soon as I manage to pay them - perhaps I'll have to use a Pay Point - I'll be switchin to an outfit called Atlantic.

 

The arrogance of these large corporations disgusts me beyond belief. I have a very long memory for them. Most have a bad record publicised in the distant past by the newspapers. But they never change their spots, though they like to change their name. I will never use British Telecom or any company that requires a line of theirs, British Gas, Scottish Gas (same outfit), Eon or from now on, EDF.

 

Whe I tried to pay them by phone, they were very busy and I could wait. No mention of how many in the queue or an estimate of how long I'd have to wait. My time could be of no importance or value to me, and it certainly wasn't to them. But that's just one example of their shameless arrogance. There are a few others. It's as if they can't think up enough ways to waste youu time and make a fool of you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a good article in the Mail the other day, normally a friend of the large corporations, pointing out that the insurance industry needed to restore the public's confidence in them, after so many years of crooked twisting of their customers. The ones they knew couldn't afford lawyers, of course. I only insure the car because I have to morally and legally, but nothing else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...