Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I was caught speeding 3 times in the same week, on the same road. All times were 8-12mph higher than the limit. I was offered the course for the first offense and I now need to accept the other 2 offenses. I just want to be ready for what might come. Will I get the £100 fine and 3 points for each of them or do I face something more severe?  These are my only offenses in 8 years of driving.
    • I'll get my letter drafted this evening. Its an item I sold, which I'm also concerned about, as whilst I don't have my original purchase receipt (the best I have is my credit card statement showing a purchase from Car Audio Centre), I do unfortunately have the eBay listing where I sold it for much less. But as I said before this is now a question of compensation: true compensation would seek to put me back into the position I was in before the loss ie: that title would remain with me until my buyer has accepted this, and so compensation should be that which would be needed to replace the lost item. But in the world of instant electronic payment, it could be argued that as I had already been paid, the title to the goods had already transferred, and I was required to refund the buyer after the loss. And so, despite my declared value being the retail price - that which is needed to return me to my pre-sales position, the compensatory value should be the value I sold it for, which being a second-hand item from a private seller is lower. I still believe that I should be claiming for the item's full value, rather than how much I sold it for, as this is the same for insurance: we don't insure the value we paid, but rather the value of the item to put us back into the position we would be in if we ever needed to claim. Its for the loss adjuster to argue the toss
    • amusing that 'bad economic judgement on behalf of prior party ISN'T a major reason to wingers to move to deform yet immigration is, where record levels of such has been driven by the right wings terrible brexit and the later incompetent dog whistle 'proposals largely driven to whistle to the right wingnuts Just seems to confirm the are clueless numpties 'wetting their own shoes   Has farage bought a property in Clacton yet?   yet concern for the NHS is listed as a major issue even by those saying they are moving to deform  
    • Also, have you told us how much you paid for this vehicle? Are there any other expenses you have incurred – insurance, inspections et cetera? How far away from the dealership do you live?
    • In fact I see that in the document you posted above – your letter to big motoring world you refer to the diagnostics report and you say that you sent a copy to big motoring world but you haven't let us see it. Any reason for this?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

General Debt Issue


rondodiver
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4706 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All I have formed this response any comments would be gratefully accepted I thinks this makes the position perfectly

 

Dear Sirs

Further to your letter of 22/06/2011 the points of which have been noted, as you are aware we are not obliged to divulge any information regarding the accounts of the late xxxx estate therefore your request for official documentation is denied.

As my Father died intestate you will no doubt be aware that any claims on the estate need to provide documentary signed evidence of an agreement. I note in your letter that these accounts are of considerably age and you are unable to supply any documentation or signed agreements, however, I also note that you mention supplying an application form from Providian, please be advised that that information is not satisfactory, as it is merely an application form and does not constitute any agreement, on the points noted above therefore these accounts / agreements are unenforceable.

You state the attached payments show clear acknowledgement of these debts however one of the statements does not even bear the deceased’s name therefore the account could relate to anybody, in which case it cannot be included for consideration in the estate.

I agree that any monies from the estate do indeed need to settle outstanding debts, providing there is clear evidence showing that a legally enforceable debt exists. The information you have provided does not provide that evidence beyond any doubt, therefore on that basis I can only assume you are not legally entitled to collect the debts.

Based on the points above you must agree that the debts are clearly unenforceable and un-evidenced and therefore cannot be included for consideration, however as a gesture of goodwill I proposed 3 options available to Cabot Financial

1) Accept a 5% offer to settle the debts in full

2) Cabot File a legal claim against the estate (please note documentary evidence will be required as mention above

3) Write the debts off

You state there cannot be any deadlines of these accounts you are misinformed and I now document the deadline.

To enable any claim to be considered you must provide evidence of an enforceable debt by 16:00 on Friday 1st July any claims after that date will not be entertained.

Yours Faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

That looks very good to me,I am sure others will take a look for you.

Bump

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

They'll break all their crayons trying to reply to that:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

They would be extremely stupid to try, you have given them multiple opportunities to prove a debt exists and their entitlement to collect & they've failed. An application form does not prove a debt, nor do payment statements particularly as they are not linked.

 

It is an Executors overriding duty to ensure that the estate is handled correctly & that is exactly what you are doing.

 

Take no notice of Cabots latest missive, it is obviously written by some spotty faced office boy who's only concern is whether he'll reach his 'targets' or not. ;)

 

BTW, they cannot add interest or charges as debt collectors unless it was specifically included within the terms and conditions of the original agreement, an agreement which they are spectacularly unable to produce. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have given the idiots enough already, they now have until 01/07/2011

to establish and prove their claim after that bye bye:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter posted by Special delivery this morning should be at their offices by 9am hopefully at least by lunchtime anyhows. Would love to be a fly on the wall when they open that one and even better when they get a follow up the following monday assuming they don't respond of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All just getting everything organised, as sofar to date Cabot have not responded to the above letter and there is now less than 24 hrs for them to do so, however they have, on a slightly diffferent subject, sent an email to say they have never received any communication from my Solicitors, however my solicitor obviousley says otherwise, anyway the point I make is, is this a tactic to delay and string things out even further by way of "we havent had enough opportunity to provide said documents" ploy. It clearly wont work from my point of view. I do not believe they will reply and will be telling they are excluded on Friday. Interms of the exclusion letter can anyone offer some guidance on a letter to use. Any help as always very much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI get the solicitor to resend communication urgently.

Time for response set in law must be met or the default thus makes a dispute and as such

renders ''enforcement'' void that is court action, they can still ask for payment.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

well as expected cabot have not responded so I intend to send them the following, as always any comments very much appreciated

 

Dear Sirs

I refer to my letter dated 24th June 2011 towhich I have not received a reply.

I clearly outlined in that letter that theestate required satisfactory evidence and documention inking the accounts tothe deceased by 01 July 2011, you have failed to adequately respond and supplythe information requested, therefore I have no alternative but to inform youthat the estate accounts for xxxx are now closed and Cabot Financial have beenexcluded.

The reasons for the exclusion are as follows;


  1. That you have failed to provide satisfactory evidence and documentation linking the deceased to the accounts.
  2. Failed to provide detailed statements of accounts bearing a clear link to the deceased
  3. Failed to supply the orginal signed agreements.

You have stated that you will not be able tosupply any documents in relation to the accounts, therefore, the absence ofthese documents automatically renders the accounts un-enforceable, this will,as you are no doubt aware, will be the only possible outcome should you decideto seek court action, which, of course will be vigourously defended .

This is the estates final decision and nofurther communication on the above matter will be entertained.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats telling em!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

will be sending the above letter today by SD, however can anyone point me in the direction of any threads that are similar, or indeed any case law relating to this. Also is the proof of debts in any Act etc eg. the Administration of Estates Act or CCA 1974

 

Any help would be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haven't sent the letter yet but I have clarified the non communication issue and it seems like Cabot are playing silly buggers, I have asked the solicitor to clarify the exact legal position with regards telling Cabot now to bog off, then letter will be sent post haste. Still would like to find some case law legislation etc been searching and not really come across much but will keep searching.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they not out of time re placing a claim on the estate?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lots of guests this evening. hello guests.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I firmly believe they are out of time I am just making sure nothing is going to come back and bite me in the backside. They have admitted the only thing can provide is an application form and some spurious payment history which in one case doesn't show my fathers name on it. So just playing it very safe. I would love to be able to quote some precedent but cannot find anything to back the argument up unless anyone knows different. Even the administration of estates act doesn't cover this type of event. I have no doubt that I will be able to send the letter tomorrow and all will start to finally come to it's natural conclusion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they did not prove their alleged debt within the stated time limits IMHO TOUGH!!!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldn't agree more I'm just dotting the i's and crossing the t's and ensuring once this is dealt with I can scatter my fathers ashes with a clear head knowing I did the best I could for him now as much as I would have done if he was still with us

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me say that you have my sympathy,it must be hard to have to go through all this.

 

Regards

 

Brig,

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks brig appreciate the comments and really appreciate all the help and advice everyone is giving.

 

I will beat those dca I am of the opinion that they contributed to my dads stroke in 2003 with their never ending calls causing him horrendous stress. Ultimately the banks are all to blame for lending a 70 year old man money when he had only his pension to pay it back and no assets of any value. I not saying he was right in borrowing money but the banks should have been stricter and enforced tighter controls IMHO. They then pass the debt on to a bunch of scumbags who think they can get money without proving anything, well they thought wrong. Sorry rant over thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The rant is acceptable and totally reasonable in this situation,

did yo see the story in the newspapers at the begining of the year

where an elderly man had around 30 cards and owed around 70-80K,

he only had his pension and one card was issued 3 months before he died.

I sincerely hope you can get closure and put your father to rest.

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's both tragic,& criminal lack of the common duty of care.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all received a letter this morning from Cabot as follows

 

Dear Mr xx

 

Big Bold Letters Further to previous communications

 

Please be advised that due to the matters you have raised we are passing the file to Cabot's in house solicitors Morgans who shall write to you directly

 

Thank you for your assistance

 

If you have any quesries blah blah blah

 

Looks to me like they intend to try the court route or could this be just a threat

Link to post
Share on other sites

Watch out for the gobby para legal, I bet mr. Piers Morgan commercial Director and Solicitor will ever see it:!:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...