Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Seems OK, except that you must provide your details (as the driver). Include your name, address, DOB and driving licence number. This is to comply with s172 of the Road Traffic Act. Keep a copy and get a free Certificate of Posting from the Post Office.
    • Dear all, some information/advice required please.   I recently received a Further Steps Notice about a fine from 19/03/2018 which I knew nothing about. It was regarding a vehicle parked on the street without tax ( It was covered up and there because the only key to it had been stolen, I had been away from home  and I was having trouble getting a new key cut and coded to the vehicle )  I had not made a change of address to DVLA which would be why I knew nothing about the fine until receiving the final steps notice dated 29th April 2024 and giving me 10 working days to pay, although the notice did not arrive till May 9th 2024. I emailed the London Collection and Compliance Centre on May 13th 2024 asking for any information and they sent me a copy of the original fine. It is for  £390 back vehicle tax, £85 cost and £600 fine.  I now have received a Notice of Enforcement dated 7th June 2024 demanding payment ( total £1036)  or an arrangement by 6am 15th June ( tomorrow )  My question is is it tool late now to question the £600 fine part of the total amount to be paid ? That amount seems punitive.  Would making a statuary declaration regarding having no knowledge of the original court date apply ? And any other advice gratefully received. I am on Universal Credit and apparently they have already taken £177 via benefit reductions which I wasn’t aware of, but does make it seem strange that they were also unable to contact me.    Many thanks for any assistance 
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • You're right of course, just jarring when an actual man child is knocking on my door so close to the end. Anyway, I'll keep this thread updated if ever any exciting does actually happen. Thanks again.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Crazy charges from DLC/Orange


Darkly
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4853 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I received a letter from Orange on the 6th Feb 2011 demanding full payment of £170.81 which I owe or risk debt collection. I replied in letter and stated that I had currently lost my job and can only afford to pay them £5 a month. They didn't reply.

 

Then I've just (23/02/11) received a letter from DLC demanding £862.24 on behalf of Orange. How can this be right? These are some crazy charges, they don't give any information on what they are for or my original debt. The letter is all jumbled up too, words over other words and I can only just make out that its on behalf of Orange.

 

Any advice would be much appreciated! Im a total newby to this sort of stuff and have no legal knowledge at all.

 

Thanks guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the best advice i could give is to go and see citizens advice.

 

do not i repeat do not contact the DCA by phone, do everything by post keeping copies for yourself, they will try to bully and scaremonger you into paying the lot but don't give into them the ball is firmly in your court. ask them for the proof of what you owe and explain the situation you are in and wait for them to act.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, were you within the minimum term of a contract? If so the bill will be for the remaining months of the contract.

 

Deal in writing as dee_jay says.

 

The nasty thing about all this (which I don't think you will have realised yet) is that Orange will have put a black mark on your credit file that will stay there for 6 years.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

I received a letter from Orange on the 6th Feb 2011 demanding full payment of £170.81 which I owe or risk debt collection. I replied in letter and stated that I had currently lost my job and can only afford to pay them £5 a month. They didn't reply.

 

Then I've just (23/02/11) received a letter from DLC demanding £862.24 on behalf of Orange. How can this be right? These are some crazy charges, they don't give any information on what they are for or my original debt. The letter is all jumbled up too, words over other words and I can only just make out that its on behalf of Orange.

 

Any advice would be much appreciated! Im a total newby to this sort of stuff and have no legal knowledge at all.

 

Thanks guys.

 

The charges DLC are pursuing you for are most likely for the remainder of your Orange contract, if you were only a couple of months into a 18 or 24 month contract they are likely to be sizeable.

Edited by Human Writes
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

If that is charges for the remainder of the contract period, they would be quite a lot, but not all would be justifiable.

 

If they took you to court I don't believe that they would get more than the outstanding value of the phone that they supplied (the discounted value, not the retail price).

 

I wouldn't pay Orange anything that they hadn't invoiced me for. I would write to Orange and dispute the outstanding amount in the first instance, certainly would not phone DLC. Definately don't disclose any other phone numbers to them ...

 

They will add a default to your credit record, when this is over you can look in the Debt -> CRA forum for possible ways to try to remove this

Link to post
Share on other sites

Orange have multiplied the remaining number of months in the contract * monthly amount to give the amount they claim

 

Although they say that the phone is free, they get them at vastly reduced costs and take that out of the monthly payments. The rest is for calls.

 

However, that does not represent their actual costs - just what you had agreed to pay for the contracted period where they were providing the service

 

But for the remainder of the contract, they are not providing the service. If they took the OP to court (and their claim was defended) then they could only claim their actual losses. That would be pro rata what they had paid for the phone.

 

What I am suggesting is that the OP should be able to get quite a hefty discount on that balance to settle the matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Orange have multiplied the remaining number of months in the contract * monthly amount to give the amount they claim

 

Although they say that the phone is free, they get them at vastly reduced costs and take that out of the monthly payments. The rest is for calls.

 

However, that does not represent their actual costs - just what you had agreed to pay for the contracted period where they were providing the service

 

But for the remainder of the contract, they are not providing the service. If they took the OP to court (and their claim was defended) then they could only claim their actual losses. That would be pro rata what they had paid for the phone.

 

What I am suggesting is that the OP should be able to get quite a hefty discount on that balance to settle the matter.

 

If the OP has agreed to pay them a set amount from a minimum term then does not do that then they will have lost payment for the remainder of the term and they could claim for that as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies guys. I've worked it out and realised that the amount owed is infact the remainder of my bill. Stupid of me not to realise but nevermind, now I know.

 

I've just sent a 'prove it' letter to DLC, just waiting to hear back. I was just wondering if there are any letter templates that let them know I can only afford to pay £5 a month to them as I have little to no disposable income.

 

Thanks for the help already!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...