Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Leaving a new job and contracts


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4870 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You cannot resign with immediate effect - not signing your contract is irrelevant, and you are, like the employer, bound by its terms. If you do so then there are risks involved. Whilst those risks are not commonplace - they happen often enough to be well worth noting. If you then take the risk - on your own head be it.

 

Those pesky contractual rights that employees like to talk about work both ways. If you resign then in law your employer can sue you for breach of contract. That must be for a loss that they can quantify, which isn't always easy to do - but it is also far from impossible. You could, therefore, end up being sued, and owing more to the employer than you ever earned plus their legal costs. This does not happen often - but it does happen and you have been told it does, so don't complain to me if it does! The problem with this one is that everybody assumes that they won't be the unlucky one, or the employer can't prove a loss, etc., etc., - if everybody was right there wouldn't be any such cases, and there are. So do remember that in the words of the Lottery "It might be you"!

 

Not getting paid any wages, accrued holiday and or expenses is more likely. Yes, this is also a breach of contract and you can sue them - but it is actually far more likley that the employer will then counter-sue for the above! This scennario is actually far more common and could possibly still end up with you owing them money! It's one of those "people in glass houses" situation - so whilst I would not tell you not to take legal action to recover anything owed to you, I would not neceaasrily recommend doing so for this reason.

 

My personal favourite - I have only come across this one once in reality - but the client also "thought it would never happen to him"... The employer finds out where you have moved to, and writes to the employer, threatening them with legal action for inducing you to breach of contract (this assumes that you are going to work somewhere else - but you'd be kind of daft to give up a job without one to go to, so I am assuming that is the case) - the new employer sacks you as a result and the old employer still sues you! So you end up unemployed, owing money, and with a CCJ.

 

I should also add that I don't understand the third point really - but if you have ordered supplies and these belong to your employer, if you keep any supplies you could be charged with theft - if you have ordered supplies which you have paid for and the company should reimburse, I would suggest you can go whistle for the money because I doubt you will ever see it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are determined, then I can't disagree with any of the other posters - but I definitely agree with you that amicably is the way to go if at all possible. The problem with telling people that something is a low risk is that you never know who is at low risk until the employer does it! Having met someone who has lost thousands of £'s in this "low risk process", I am always wary of simply telling people it is a low risk and err on the side of making it very clear. Perhaps a bit overly cautious - but better that than someone taking your advice and ending up on the other side of it!

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...