Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Council tax demand. please help!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4963 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi there, i will try to keep this short

 

back in September 2007 I started my nurse training and a couple of week before i started my husband was made redundant, so we decided that he will be stay at home dad.

I was entitled to a student disregard, so filled in a form at my council office stating my circumstances explaining that hubby was out of work.

I shortly received a bill stating that no council tax was due to be paid, and received the same bills for the 3 years of my course.

My husband also became a full time student in the year 2009-2010, but we didn't fill in a disregard form as we didn't pay council tax anyway.

I informed the council in September that I had finished my course and that hubby and I are now working, and I received a bill detailing a 25% discount, so telephoned them questioning what it was for. I was asked if my husband was living with me for the last three years to which I said yes, and explained he had been unemployed and also a student, and I was told I would receive an updated bill.

so today my husband has received a bill for over £2000! for amounts due over the last three years!! due by Dec 7th 2010.

I just don't understand how they have made such a huge mistake, and am so worried as we just can't pay such a huge amount.

any advice would be greatly received.

tia

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd query that

sounds like someones got something wrong.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This definitely needs querying, they've made a mistake and haven't bothered to inform you of it or how it can be resolved, they've just lumbered you with a huge bill. Unless you filled out a council tax and housing benefit form they should have been charging you your normal council tax rate minus 25% for you whilst you were a student; they shouldn't have been charging you zero.

 

You might be able to sumit a backdated benefit claim but I'm not sure how far back they would be able start it from. Get in touch with the council tax dept re this enormous amount they are suddenly demanding, and then contact the benefits dept to see how far back claims can go - make sure you expain this situation to them as it might make a difference.

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...