Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

julestoolsuk vs GMAC


JulesTools
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6358 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

S.A.R letter sent 04/09/06 to gmac-rfc feel free to copy/paste to suit your needs

 

 

Data Protection Act 1998

Subject Access Request

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER [s] : xxxxxxxx

Please supply me with a complete list of transactions and charges relating to my history with your organisation within the last 12 years. Please include a copy of all data held i.e mortgage statements, charges, early repayment fees, deed fees, land registry fees etc .for the period in which I had financial dealings with you.

 

Additionally, where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff, or any other person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my business with you.

 

If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your response.

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. May I remind you, you have 40 days in which to comply with this request. Furthermore, if I discover that you have levied disproportionate penalties against me, then I shall be reclaiming them, and also reclaiming the enclosed £10 Data Protection Act subject access request fee.

 

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you previously used to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

I would be happy to collect the Data from my local branch/broker.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

[ your name ]

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a modified letter from the templates I believe.

 

You can claim the 10.00 SAR fee as part of the cost in bringing your claim. It does not form part of the actual amount claimed. So the services/penalty issue does not arise.

 

Hope this helps

 

Zoot

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Zoot you have lost me ~ please enlighten me

 

On the one hand you say you can claim the fee as part of the cost in bringing your claim. So if charges are as an example 100 and S.A.R 10 then total claim = 110

 

You then say it does not form part of the actual amount claimed ~ you not going to claim 110?

 

Clearly I am missing the point you are putting accross

 

Please educate - many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Data Protection stuff arrived yesterday by recorded delivery , just need to find time to wade through it all.Very thourough with what they have sent me copies of EVERYTHING including little jotted notes on letters etc and presented in a lovely plastic folder,aaawwwwww bless.Will sift through everything and see what i am entitled to and re-post later

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Right the SAR has been sat gathering dust since September and my Yorkshire bank claims are drawing to a close.

Decided its finally time to look through the mountain of info they have sent me and guess what!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

From the statements I have gathered that I paid

 

REDEMPTION INTEREST OF £2608.30

and

OVERPAID REDEMPTION OF £650.96

 

So as of January 1st the prelim letter is going off to GMAC RFC .

 

Will keep everyone updated

 

Jules

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi All,

Quick update for you all

 

Sent my prelim letter to Gmac yesterday as follows

 

Request for repayment of charges

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

My request

 

I am writing to ask you to refund to me the ‘Redemption Penalty’ charges which you levied on my mortgage account when I settled the balance around July 2005.

I now understand that the redemption penalty fee which you applied to my account in order for me to pay off and close the mortgageis unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent consumer regulations. If you say that they are not, then will you please demonstrate this by letting me have a full breakdown of the costs to which you have been put as a result of me paying off my mortgage with you early, in order to reassure me that your penalties really do reflect your costs.

 

In Common Law you can only recover liquidated losses stemming from a breach of contract - that is, money which it has actually cost you to end the contract early.

 

To quote The Govan Law Centre: "charges represent a penalty and are therefore irrecoverable at common law. In the Scottish case of Castaneda and Others v. Clydebank Engineering and Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. (1904) 12 SLT 498 the House of Lords held that a contractual party can only recover damages for actual or liquidated losses incurred from a breach of contract. This is also the position in English law: Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor Co Ltd [1915] AC 79."

 

Your responsibilities

 

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

I am frankly shocked that when I settled my mortgage with you, you operated my account in this way as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as my fiduciary.

 

I consider that your contract suggested that your redemption penalty charges are fair, legal and reasonable are deceptive and that they have deceived me into agreeing to pay them. Your concealment of the true nature of your charges has prevented me from asserting my right until now.

 

What I require

 

I calculate that you have taken £3108.67 in redemption penalty charges, which I paid at the time I settled my mortgage with you. I require you to return this sum to me.

My targets to resolve this matter

 

I hope that you will enter into a sincere dialogue with me about this matter and I am writing this letter to you on the assumption that you will prefer to do this than merely respond with standard letters and leaflets.

 

I will give you 14 days to reply to me accepting, unconditionally, my request in principle and letting me know a date by which I will receive payment.

 

If you do not respond, or you do not respond positively, within this time period, I shall send you a letter before court action giving you a further 14 days in which to reflect. I believe that these targets are more than sufficient for a large company such as yours with dedicated staff and departments.

 

After that, there will be no further communication from me and I shall issue a claim within the courts at the expiry of the second deadline .This will obviously incur further charges for which I will be seeking repayment of along with the £10 fee already paid to yourselves for the Subject Access Request I submitted.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...