Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. I am reading through the full thread and will continue to research. I have come across a reference to a form called N180 DQ in the thread, but I cannot see any reference to this form in my case nor can I see it on the MoneyClaim website. Should I have been sent this form? Thanks 
    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

advice re bailiffs


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5087 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i am registered owner of the vehicle. Bailiffs apparenty entered my home yesterday with a letter entitled removal of goods in relation to a purported warrant issued by Northampton CC in respect of 2 outstanding parking fines. Partner allowed him in due to intimidation and paid one of the amounts in excess of £250.

 

I am confused as 1) I know nothing about either parking fine and 2)albeit my partner appears to be aware of one of the fines which he put in letter of appeal in respect of, the other fine which he paid bailiff he knew nothing about either.

 

I have no idea what documents I should have received, but I believe I should have had something before it reached this stage.

 

Can any one help on what I can do next. The fines appear in connection with parking outside my house :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that - I guess I need to contact the TEC and provide a witness statement as I was unaware of either pcn and certainly have not received any further letters.

 

I am also worried about the implications of having these registered against me???????

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am also worried about the implications of having these registered against me???????

 

All it means is that as far as the Court in concerned you owe the outstanding penalty and it can be collected by the Council as a debt using baliffs if required.

Once its paid it is settled and not recorded on any public register so will no longer show as a debt, obviously the Council will keep a record that you got a PCN and paid it but it is not like a criminal record or CCJ and is for all intents forgotten about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that - I guess I need to contact the TEC and provide a witness statement as I was unaware of either pcn and certainly have not received any further letters.

 

I am also worried about the implications of having these registered against me???????

 

What many bailiff companies will do when they are passed the Warrant by the council is to "CLEANSE" the warrant. This means that they will check the address on the warrant against various databases and if you have moved home they will CHANGE the address on the warrant. If the wrong house number or post code is on the warrant they will CHANGE it.

 

Crucially, one very large LONDON local authority also allow their bailiff company to charge THE DEBTOR £45 for locating your NEW ADDRESS !!!

 

Don't even consider that any of the above is fair.....

 

When you telephone the Traffic Enforcement Centre you need to ask them to CONFIRM the original address for the PCN. You will need the PCN number BEFORE you ring them.

 

PS: If you have paid, you can still complete an Out of Time Statutory Declaration.

Edited by tomtubby
Link to post
Share on other sites

i am registered owner of the vehicle. Bailiffs apparenty entered my home yesterday with a letter entitled removal of goods in relation to a purported warrant issued by Northampton CC in respect of 2 outstanding parking fines. Partner allowed him in due to intimidation and paid one of the amounts in excess of £250.

 

I am confused as 1) I know nothing about either parking fine and 2)albeit my partner appears to be aware of one of the fines which he put in letter of appeal in respect of, the other fine which he paid bailiff he knew nothing about either.

 

I have no idea what documents I should have received, but I believe I should have had something before it reached this stage.

 

Can any one help on what I can do next. The fines appear in connection with parking outside my house :???:

 

 

Did you file Out of Time Witness Statements?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...