Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I drove a friends a car for a few days and I used cuvva car insurance to insure myself for the time period. Here's the problem: I made a mistake with the dates on the insurance, I ended up driving uninsured for one day and I got a speeding ticket. My friend named me as the driver on the Notice of Intended Prosecution as she should and I will take the blame of course. Will met police ask for proof that I was in fact driving? I mean, any more other than me replying to the NIP that I will soon receive from them? Cause I assume that my insurance for the day will be the proof that they need... Secondly,  if caught driving uninsured, what will happen please? I read it's £300 and 6 points. Is that all or is it worse? I'm only asking for information from knowledgable people. If you intent to just mock, you're certainly not helping. Thanks
    • Hi, Please find letter sent to BMW with all evidence off issues which is a link from Audi. Unable to share the footage on this forum as I am not the best with tech BMW FAULTY CAR LETTER.docx
    • This is the first item that I've ever claimed for - I don't really send too many parcels, probably 5 in the last 5 years, and only two with P2G / EVRi. I've attached two emails from P2G regarding their requiring the documents. They don't specify in the emails what documents I should be sending, although when opening the claim they were requesting that I needed photographic proof of sending - picture of the parcel with their label attached, in the EVRi ParcelShop. The second email is their closing the enquiry due to my failure to produce said document(s). I haven't yet drafted my claim letter, I wanted to be sure of this document situation first before I began action. But therein lies another problem. Not having a P2G account, I cannot be sure of the item value that I declared. The retail value at the time was £600, which is less than the £650 I paid several months earlier, so I would likely have used that, but cannot be sure. And without having an account I can't check either. But, I know that I did properly declare the item and a value that reflected its then retail price - I was concerned this declaration may have been used to single the item for theft. But now that the retail price has reduced substantially, even though the nature of compensation is to return the claimant back to their original position, without my purchase receipt, I was concerned that I may have to claim for less. And yes, I've been through your huge document store of information, in addition to MoneySavingExpert, Which, Citizens Advice, Gov.uk "make a court claim", my own law books (annoyingly I specialised in consumer law when I studied for my law degree, but I graduated 17 years ago), and so now feel that its time to either act, or drop it. P2G Enquiry (2).pdf P2G Enquiry (1).pdf
    • I have found both forms online  https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/62e14db38fa8f5649f912647/TE9.pdf https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60c73ad0d3bf7f4bd6a9bc69/te7-dart-eng.pdf   do i just fill in both forms and send to the address on them or directly to Manchester council  forgive my ignorance    thanking you in advance 
    • This is a little strange. Please pop onto MCOL, copy the claim history and paste it here.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

The law of the land does not apply to the Apple iPhone; JRP v. Orange


JRP1414
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4389 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Here is a brief summary of a problem I am experiencing with Orange:

 

- Took out a contract with Orange for an Apple iPhone, paid £99 for the handset.

 

- 24hrs after receiving the phone, it developed an intermittent fault whereby the signal drops out and a message pops up - 'No SIM card installed'.

 

- Called Orange Tech Support who agreed it was a fault with the handset but said my only option was to take the phone to an Apple shop to have it repaired / replaced under the warranty. I explained that my contract was with Orange and therefore it was my statutory right that they should replace the handset as it was not fit for purpose / of satisfactory quality. Orange said that for any other make of handset, this is the case, but not for the iPhone! They said that Apple have stipulated in a contract between them and Orange that they must manage any replacements / repairs. They basically said the law does not apply to the iPhone!

 

- I requested to speak with a supervisor and was told one would call me back. Some 2hrs later, after chasing up this call, I did receive a call from a supervisor, who to my surprise, reiterated their stance that the law under the Sale of Goods Act or Sale & Supply of Goods and Services Act, does not apply to the Apple iPhone! He said I MUST speak to Apple to arrange a repair / replacement under the terms of the warranty.

 

- I have fired off an email to Orange Customer Services, demanding they honour my statutory rights and replace my phone. I cannot believe what they are doing!

 

I will keep you posted on the outcome. Has anyone else experienced similar problems?

 

JRP1414

Link to post
Share on other sites

After the most shocking example of customer service I have ever experienced in my life, I ended up giving up and calling Apple direct. They are sending me a replacement handset. Still no proper response from Orange, except for an answerphone message on the broken phone, leaving no return

contact details!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to say - you may have been the architect of your own misfortune.

 

Firstly, the error message you get often is a problem with the SIM latch not being engaged correctly/properly, giving an intermittent contact, and the problems you experienced. In a similar situation, the SIM card itself can become slightly oxidised and needs a good clean with a lint-free cloth.

 

As for the repair/replacement procedure. Afriad, Orange is right - Apple have arrange to handle all service issues, so why you want to deal with the Monkey than the Organ Grinder eludes me. Since Orange don't hold replacement stocks, there is little point shouting at them.

 

Incidentally, as Applies is Orange's 'agent' for the servicing, there has been no breach - the proper procedures were followed. The same will hold true when your battery packs in and you need that replaced. If you buy into Apple, you play the game their way.

 

One of the main reasons I'll never touch them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, well you may well be correct with your diagnosis of the fault but nevertheless, being just 24hrs old when it developed the fault, it's hardly acceptable & I struggle to see how I could be at all to blame. On the SIM card front, that too is brand new & works perfectly in another handset, so that narrows it down to the phone. If you had it in your hand, you would agree with me that it's definitely a loose connection inside.

 

On the Apple/ Orange front, it is plain & simple; my contract for the purchase of the goods / provision of the service is with Orange. I have no contract with Apple (save for product safety issues) & they would be well within their rights to tell me to get lost and to go speak to Orange to get a fault rectified. Orange have provided me with a service & also goods within the provision of that service and consequently the Supply of Goods & Services Act 1982 stipulates that those goods must be of satisfactory quality & fit for purpose. It is quite clear there is an inherent fault with the phone & therefore the responsibility lies with Orange to replace it. I don't have to go to Apple, I don't have to dance to their tune, but yes I can see advantages of going direct. My biggest gripe was that I had to do all the running around, incurring time & expense for something that was not my fault. It is these losses which I will be seeking to recover from Orange for breach of our contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you refer to the described problem, it would be in the same league as a car door not shut completely, and you complaining of a warning light on the dash that prevented the engine starting. Close the door and the problem is solved!

 

Similarly - until/unless the contacts of the SIM/phone are checked (to eliminate the issue from the 'usual suspects', there's little I can add.

 

As to your second paragraph - I do not know if you are interpreting what I said, you are NOT being told to go off and 'see Apple' because Orange cannot be bothered to deal with you. Apple have their own dedicated repair centres around the country (there's one just 40 miles from me) so you are going to the so-called centre of excellence to provide a speedy repair, Orange told you this and you are dissatisfied with this. In my book that is your problem and not theirs. Why not follow their advice and get it fixed/replaced? IF it doesn't, then bring out the indignation and demands for restitution.

 

It may be clear to YOU that there is an 'internal fault' - how many iPhones have you had? A good many so-called out of the box failures are user error. A retailer isn't going to increase it's levels of graded stock because a customer cannot read the instructions correctly. In cases where genuine faults are identified, then clearly repair/replacement is warranted, but not until then.

 

Lastly. You have made some whacking assumptions (all incorrect) that will leave you looking foolish and any dealings with them, and probably lead to an impasse that will (unfortunately) leave you disadvantaged. Have you actually READ your contract? In it there are no 'service' guarantees - there may be if you have taken out a business contract but not a retail one. As such, compensation will not be payable, there may be some goodwill (line rental rebate) but these are discretionary, and if you are unreasonable (or appear to be so) this won't happen.

 

Lastly the Goods and Services Act doesn't really apply - you have a Service Contract for network service which transcends this, and affects your SIM. The phone is covered by SoGA, nothing else. There is no marriage of the items to one common goal. as problems with one do not equate to any waiver of the other.

 

Rather than paint yourself into a corner, do it their way, and if that fails. Complain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hello,

 

Aware this is a 2 year old thread but thought it helpful for others to update on similar experience and my approach.

 

I received a new iphone from orange - with an intermittent mic problem that manifested on the first day after receiving the phone.

 

I called orange support and was first advised to call apple, which I did and explained the problem, they advised they would repair or replace with a refurnished phone. I told them it was actually DOA (dead on arrival) as it was supplied faulty and that I would like a new phone, not refurbished - apple advised I would have to have reported it within 14 days to them and it was past that period

 

I then called orange back - I had reported the fault within 10 days to them, advised that it was NOT a warranty repair but actually a DOA handset and that I would like a new one to replace it - they eventually agreed and one should be delivered to me later today.

 

If you raise the problem within a certain time on receipt of the goods then it is a different process - one of faulty goods supplied, not of working goods then developing a fault and the process for replacement is different.

 

Regards the posting referencing SOGA - it is the company supplying the goods who are liable, not the manufacturer of those goods so respectfully disagree with previous posts - Orange may have a service agreement with apple to repair faults under warranty but that does not negate the fact that it is Orange who supplied them to you, not apple

 

Hope that helps others

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...