Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

2nd time taking employer to small claims


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5239 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

I took my former employer to court in January last year, as stated here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/employment-problems/174935-tribunal-withdrawn-now-going.html

 

Before then I had sent off a subject access request, specifically all of my contract documents, as these would prove my case. The company either never responded or seemed to pretend I didn't ask.

 

Since then I have received an admission that during the case stated above, they tried to look for all of my documents but they had all gone missing. - How convenient...

 

I also have been experiencing all of my letters from the place where I worked going missing. Because of this my communications are now exclusively with the head office and I have a letter from them claiming several letters have been sent from the other place, yet I never received anything. This started happening after I went to the place to show the deputy manager the problems with my wages and I had been seen by another manager who acted very strangely (January 2008 ). In these lost responses there would have likely been photocopies of documents like wage slips and P45. Can I pursue this matter of stolen letters in any way, or at least use this as evidence indicating the loss of my contract documents is not an accident?

 

Obviously this is unnacceptable. I just need confirmation that there would be no problem taking this company to court again over separate issues, in spite of the failure of the first case (due to the sheer stupidity of her majesty's legal system).

 

Furthermore, you might also be wondering why I don't have a copy of this contract myself. Well, again this company again broke the law (they do that quite a lot) by not providing me one when I started working here. Can I pursue this matter, along with the above, in the small claim also? It has not been pursued before either.

 

Thirdly, I know that there is an issue where the issue estoppel can be overlooked under certain conditions. Is it worth further pursuing this also, claiming that the deliberate loss of my documents justifies looking at this other case again?

 

Finally, If I were to pursue this, how much do I ask for??

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Edited by haggismn
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

I took my former employer to court in January last year, as stated here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/employment-problems/174935-tribunal-withdrawn-now-going.html

 

Before then I had sent off a subject access request, specifically all of my contract documents, as these would prove my case. The company either never responded or seemed to pretend I didn't ask.

 

Since then I have received an admission that during the case stated above, they tried to look for all of my documents but they had all gone missing. - How convenient...

 

I also have been experiencing all of my letters from the place where I worked going missing. Because of this my communications are now exclusively with the head office and I have a letter from them claiming several letters have been sent from the other place, yet I never received anything. This started happening after I went to the place to show the deputy manager the problems with my wages and I had been seen by another manager who acted very strangely (January 2008 ). In these lost responses there would have likely been photocopies of documents like wage slips and P45. Can I pursue this matter of stolen letters in any way, or at least use this as evidence indicating the loss of my contract documents is not an accident?

 

Obviously this is unnacceptable. I just need confirmation that there would be no problem taking this company to court again over separate issues, in spite of the failure of the first case (due to the sheer stupidity of her majesty's legal system).

 

Furthermore, you might also be wondering why I don't have a copy of this contract myself. Well, again this company again broke the law (they do that quite a lot) by not providing me one when I started working here. Can I pursue this matter, along with the above, in the small claim also? It has not been pursued before either.

 

Thirdly, I know that there is an issue where the issue estoppel can be overlooked under certain conditions. Is it worth further pursuing this also, claiming that the deliberate loss of my documents justifies looking at this other case again?

 

Finally, If I were to pursue this, how much do I ask for??

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

 

To start with, a statement of particulars of employment should have been given to to you within 2 months of starting employment with your firm.

 

Since 1st October 2004 changes to the previous rules have been made under Employment Act 2002. As from that date an employment tribunal normally has to award either 2 or 4 times a week's pay if an employer is "guilty" of a failure to provide written particulars of employment to an employee, but only if that "guilt" is established in the course of other proceedings before that tribunal.

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, thanks for the response.

When I started work I was handed a general booklet which stated an out of date wage chart (Daytime pay, night shift add ons, Sunday add ons, etc) and also didn't specify my personal hours worked.

In January 2009 (at court) I was handed a shift rota which was completely wrong, claiming my contract was different to what I really worked. Of course, what is mentionned there applies only to employment tribunals. I can't go down that route. It must be in county court. Is this possible for these matters?

 

The issue estoppel against me prevents me from pursuing lost wages and also their failure to provide payslips. Therefore what I am asking really is;

Can I pursue the following? Are these matters irrelavent enough to the previous case which I am banned from pursuing?:

Failure to provide written particulars of contract.

Deliberate loss of subject documents, using the theft of letters before being posted as evidence.

and also;

Attempt to remove the issue estoppel banning me from pursuing the other case, due to the deliberate loss of documents giving the company an illegal advantage in the case.

 

There isn't any silly law banning me from taking any other action against the same company, that kind of thing? Also, is it ok to pursue all of this together as one small claim?

 

There is a separate issue which I will need to address. There is a former co-worker who would be of great aid as a witness, however I don't have his contact details. All I have is his name. How would I go about getting these? I do not wish to contact the company to retrieve them. I believe he still works for them, and if they found out he would be acting as a witness against them, I believe they would intimidate him in some way. If worst comes to worst, can I somehow force the company I am suing to provide me with this man's details?

 

Thanks again

Edited by haggismn
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, thanks for the response.

When I started work I was handed a general booklet which stated an out of date wage chart (Daytime pay, night shift add ons, Sunday add ons, etc) and also didn't specify my personal hours worked.

In January 2009 (at court) I was handed a shift rota which was completely wrong, claiming my contract was different to what I really worked. Of course, what is mentionned there applies only to employment tribunals. I can't go down that route. It must be in county court. Is this possible for these matters?

 

The issue estoppel against me prevents me from pursuing lost wages and also their failure to provide payslips. Therefore what I am asking really is;

Can I pursue the following? Are these matters irrelavent enough to the previous case which I am banned from pursuing?:

Failure to provide written particulars of contract.Can be pursued in conjunction with a main case.

Deliberate loss of subject documents, using the theft of letters before being posted as evidence. I can see that as being raised with the Information Commissionner's Office

and also;

Attempt to remove the issue estoppel banning me from pursuing the other case, due to the deliberate loss of documents giving the company an illegal advantage in the case. Estoppels do not extinguish your rights. Contact a lawyer/solicitor for more details about estoppels.

There isn't any silly law banning me from taking any other action against the same company, that kind of thing?

 

There is a separate issue which I will need to address. There is a former co-worker who would be of great aid as a witness, however I don't have his contact details. All I have is his name. How would I go about getting these? I do not wish to contact the company to retrieve them. I believe he still works for them, and if they found out he would be acting as a witness against them, I believe they would intimidate him in some way. If worst comes to worst, can I somehow force the company I am suing to provide me with this man's details? You cannot 'force' the company to provide you with any private details related to employees, therefore they will not supply you with any information related to that specific person.

 

Thanks again

 

......

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...