Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • @BankFodder sorry for the delay and thank you for the lengthy reply. Yes, I agree. It's a small business and the guy is very very decent. I know someone else said my priority shouldn't be worrying whether he gets shafted but I'm not here to try and screw him over because I feel like if someone behaves decently and gets exploited, they might not behave so kindly in the future. I know DX mentioned he thinks I've caused the issue by leaving multiple instructions, but I have already explained why and both instructions were to leave it with a neighbour and there was nothing advising the driver to abandon the parcel on my doorstep. I don't think leaving it there could be considered a safe place.  I am still waiting on the retailer to respond. Ultimately, I wanted to know how he would proceed if DPD's response isn't favourable. I am certainly not looking to cause any problems. I just want my laptop. I will read the other posts for sure. I've been a bit preoccupied with family stuff. I have nothing in writing from DPD as I phoned them, but they did advise it should be the retailer that liaises with them. I tried contacting the driver straight after deliver via Whatsapp, as that's an option, but it said I couldn't send him a message and I have kept that log. We all know who took the parcel on our street, because that person has a history of parcel theft, but I don't have a doorbell camera or cctv. Police are refusing to intervene, despite the fact that I, along with several other people, spotted another's neighbour's parcel in said "suspect's" car and confronted her to get the parcel back. If the police had acted sooner, I might have had a better chance of getting the parcel back, but I suspect the laptop has long been sold on.  When the retailer responds, I will send him the link to this thread. Hopefully, he will benefit from the information on here as well.
    • @dx100uk none of the instructions advised them to leave the parcel on my door step and without such instructions., I'm struggling to see why they think it's ok to just dump it there.
    • I have checked. No recording was triggered by the camera - I don't have loop recording, only proximity and vibration sensor triggered recording - abs and since he took photos from afar and did not physically touch my car - no recording was done. 
    • He also useing he girlfriend to phone and mesage people as well
    • No TIC sheet with journeys history as I can see within the letter pack. Should there be one? Maybe they didn't look into it thoroughly?  No other pleading letter, only the one from above.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MBNA Debt.


Davidoff
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4346 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Davidoff,

Welcome to CAG :)

As Maroondevo says, you're making the right choices, the main thing is to stick to your guns-you'll be feeling nervous about it at the moment but will gain confidence as you go along, with the help from CAG. We were all where you are at the beginning. Read as much as you can on here about others in similar situations.

Are you still paying MBNA the standard minimum monthly payment, is it a pre April 2007 account and have you requested a CCA from them?

Main thing is to get them all to prove that you owe them anything, and if so that the amount you owe is correct ie not including unfair charges.

Establish whether they have valid agreements first-if they have-do a Subject Access Request and claim back the charges. Then you can get them off your back for the remainder by putting the debt with a fee free debt management company such as Payplan or CCCS.

If they haven't-keep us posted and we'll help you deal with it.

Also- Have you received default notices for any of these accounts?

Well done for making a start!

All the best,

Elsa x

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Davidoff,

Unfortunately it's a different ball game for agreements made after April 2007, when the rules changed. Theoretically a court can order payment even without sight of the CCA, but can also vary the terms in your favour if it feels they are unfair etc. Very complex subject.

Are there any unfair charges on this account? Payment Protection Insurance?

How much are you paying them, if anything, at the moment?

Have they sent a Default Notice?

Regards,

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Davidoff :)

Re the MBNA credit card account- there's lots around on CAG about it but for convenience check out this very inclusive guide with template letters:

Reclaim Credit Card Charges: Full guide to get £100s back...

 

If you have had fees slapped on for late payments, going over the limit etc a significant proportion of these can be reclaimed, with interest. Sometimes the bank will haggle but ultimately pay up after a few choice letters,, sometimes you have to force their hand by complaining to the Financial Ombudsman or making a Claim through the Small Claims Courts.

As it's a post 2007 agreement therefore probably enforceable, this would be a good way to go, to reduce the debt. This is a valid dispute which should cause them to hold off till it's resolved.

They will tend to treat your problem as "short term" whilever you are paying them anything. Once you withhold payment they will reclassify you as long term and hopefully then you may be able to negotiate more strongly. Best advice I can give on this one is reduce it as much as you can by claiming back charges, then negotiate for reduced payments and frozen interest, if necessary through Payplan or CCCS, the free Debt Management Companies.

Another possible route is if they have sent, or send you a faulty default notice. Always save these with envelopes. Let us know if you get one and we'll check it for validity.

 

I'll catch you later when you've had chance to read up on it.

Thanks for the nudge :)

Elsa xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Davidoff,

I see you were burning the midnight oil! :)

To post up on here, scan the document and blank out any personal info that can identify you, including amounts, any barcodes or reference numbers, but not dates.

Go to "tinypic.com" and follow instructions to upload image, then copy the code it gives you for displaying on a forum or blog.

Start a reply post, and paste in the code. Any problems, just shout.

 

Some of the terms of the agreement do seem odd, but post April 2007 agreements come under revised rules so are usually enforceable as mentioned, although it's up to the judge who can vary anything he thinks is unfair.

It's new ground, but you could start by researching the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 to see if anything applies.

 

For more info on the importance of Default Notices, start here.

 

Elsa xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...