Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBS - My case.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6415 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The point I was getting at is I think the rules are different in Scotland so I didn't want to send the stuff to the Scottish office only to find out later the claim was invalid because of the different rules.

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well after a false start I have now received an offer of £400 "in full and final settlement". At first I thought this was not unreasonable, but as the credit will be applied to the account which still has (last time I got a statement and assuming no further interest has been added) a negative balance of £285+.

 

So if I accept they will effectively be cancelling out the £285 overdraft - which is made up ENTIRELY of bank charges - and I will be left with around £105, which means I will still be over £200 out of pocket. Am I correct in thinking that I should tell them to shove their offer or am I shooting myslef in the foot by not accepting? What's the next step? (will have a read up of the stickies too).

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest willowb

Hey seylectric :>) what stage are you at? when did you file a claim? If I were you I'd not settle, just accept it as a pert-payment. If this is there first offer, you'll probably get a better one in a couple of weeks.

 

wxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I've just been reading through the "Dean v RBS" thread, and the letter I got back was very similar the one that zeus got:

 

"Thanks you for your letter of 8th Aug. I am sorry to learn (hear) you remain disatisfied.

 

There is nothing i can add constructively to past correspondence but i would like to resolve matters with you. Against that background and as a gesture of goodwill without admission oe error or liabilty, I am offering the sum of £400 in full and final settlement of your complaint. However our terms and conditions will continue to apply and any charges that accrue in the fuure must stand.

 

I hope you will consider this to be a fair and reasonable settlement and on receipt of your signed acceptence, I will make (immediate) arrangements for payment within 5 working days. "

 

The slight differences on my letter, from Tommy McClean, are in bold. there is themn a section at the bottom which asks me to sign as follows: "I accept the sum of £400 in full and final settlement of my complaint. Please credit this to account number xxxxxxxx."

 

So as I said they're effectively just cancelling out the overdraft that THEY have racked up - I get very little back in cold hard cash - assuming no more charges have been added to that account I would get back just over £100 of the £300+ they have already had from me.

 

 

This was in a reply to a letter I sent to them which said:

 

"With regard to your letter (reference xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) of 29 september 2006, please note that a letter before action was sent to you on 9 May 2006 to:

 

RBOS Senior Customer Relations Manager

Freepost

PO box 1727

Edinburgh

 

As your claim*** is totally made up of penalty charges, which of course are illegal under the terms of the Consumer Credit Act, a formal claim will be made through the small claims courts for the total of approximately £650 which I incurred in charges on all my RBS accounts if the money is not refunded to me in full within the next seven days."

 

*** Just to clarify, I originally claimed back in May but never pursued it. I only went on the offensive again when they sent me a letter telling me they were going to pursue a claim from me of £285 (the overdraft) on 29 September.

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest willowb

So then, do you intend on filing a claim? If you do then they won't be able to demand the o/d balance back from you until the account is settled. If they counter-claim then you'll always be one step ahead.

 

It seems like you'll be better off just going for the whole lot and asap.

 

Have I got the situation right?

 

Wxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it looks like i'll be using that "will accept as part settlement" letter and filing for the full amount. I'll have to get the paperwork out and work out the correct figure and interest.

 

I was just wary of shooting myself in the foot and getting nothing, but having read a few other threads since I posted earlier it seems that people are getting an eleventh hour out-of-court settlement, which is only right.

 

Looks like I might have a bit of a wait though, our mortgage company have just filed a repossession claim (arrears now paid in full anyway) but that case doesn't come up until 20th December so I'll be waiting until 2007 by the look of things, but will have to wait a couple of weeks in any case until I can afford the court fees.

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have been reading through the above and in conclusion, I dont think we can blame the tellers for making mistakes about verbal cancellation of DD's, as I understand it you must inform your bank and the beneficiary in writing. While we all have an axe to grind about the charges we can't blame the Banks for everything. mainly the level of service has dropped and we are all statistics on a computer to them, gone are the days of real service to be replaced by greed and avarice. Remember, we live in rip off Britain, where almost everything comes from China and we have to pay through the nose. Dog eat dog is the way of life now, get used to it and try to stay one step ahead! I have found to my peril that honesty doesnt pay with a Bank, they are in business to part you from your money and not one is better than the other, it is amazing how we stick to one Bank in an apethetic manner consistent with the old school thinking, screw them all as hard as you can before the old boys network changes the legislation in their favour.This site does give people the power to fight back so, dont pussy foot around with the Banks go for them as they have gone for you and your money...what goes around comes around so go for it!!!

Donate to keep this site open

 

Any help or advice is offered as just that, help and advice without any liability. If in doubt consult a legal expert or CAB.

 

Make Cash Flow Forecast

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/07/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6415 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...